Effects of Sunitinib Malate on Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
S Patel, P Ghayad
Keywords
metastatic renal carcinoma treatment, renal cancer medical, sunitinib malate, sutent, treatment, tyrosine kinase inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma
Citation
S Patel, P Ghayad. Effects of Sunitinib Malate on Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. The Internet Journal of Urology. 2007 Volume 5 Number 2.
Abstract
A 77 year-old female presented with gross hematuria with no other symptoms. CT scan showed metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) which spread to the adrenals and IVC. She began treatment with sunitinib malate (Sutent), an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. mRCC is a very common and potent disease that is not very treatable. This case report will show how mRCC can be treated and controlled with sunitinib malate.
Introduction
A 77 year-old female presents with history of gross hematuria, which occurred 2 months prior for one day. Patient denies any pain, nocturia, or burning, and also states she has no significant GU history. Physical exam was within normal limits and UA was +1 for leukocytes and trace for blood. Further exploration with bladder cystoscopy did not reveal any stones or lesions, and the patient was sent for a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis
Workup
CT scan w/o contrast revealed a large mass in the lower pole of the right kidney measuring 6.5 x 7.4 cm with metastasis into the right renal vein and proximal inferior vena cava. The patient had metastases to the lungs and both the right and left adrenals measuring 2.6 x 2.6 cm and 2.4 x 1.5 cm, respectively (Figure 1). Right kidney biopsy confirmed the suspicion, showing renal clear cell carcinoma with Fuhrman Nuclear Grade 2.
Diagnosis
Right renal cell carcinoma extending into the right renal vein and proximal inferior vena cava with metastasis to the lungs and bilateral adrenals. Clinical stage T3b NX M1.
Plan and Procedure
Due to the patients frail condition and severe metastatic disease there was no indication for curative nephrectomy. Therapy was started at 50 mg of Sutent to be taken once daily for four weeks, followed by a two week break, with each cycle lasting six week. After completing two cycles of therapy, a CT scan to evaluate the response to treatment was obtained.
The CT scan showed a decrease in size of the adrenal gland masses bilaterally and a decreased mass in the lower pole of the right kidney, previously measuring 6.5 cm in diameter, it was now 5.5 cm showing a 15.4% decrease after two cycles. The tumor thrombus within the right renal vein previously measured at 1.4 cm, was now 50% smaller, measuring at 7 mm. The multiple pulmonary nodules were identified as either being equal or decreasing in size (Figure 2).
Following three cycles, the patient underwent significant side affects from Sutent including hand-foot syndrome, hypothyroidism, fluid retention, hypertension, and fatigue. All the symptoms appeared during the last week of treatment and disappeared by the time the next cycle started. The fourth cycle of therapy was cut short, after two weeks, due to significant hand-foot syndrome which caused the patient pain during ambulation. The symptoms resolved after stopping therapy.
Therapy was discontinued for 2 weeks, then restarted on a lower dose of Sutent at 37.5 mg.
After five cycles, the patient had complaints of fatigue and right sided flank pain radiating to the groin. CT scan showed stable masses with right hydronephrosis. Sutent was held and the patient underwent right nephrectomy because of symptomatic hydronephrosis.
Due to surgery and discontinuation of therapy, both adrenal glands have increased in size since the previous examination suggesting the presence of metastatic disease (Figure 3).
Therapy was continued after surgery and at the completion of the seventh cycle the patient had been on Sutent therapy for one year. CT scan showed a decrease in size of the bilateral adrenal masses as compared to postop. The right adrenal mass had decreased back down from 3.2 cm to 1.9 cm, while the left adrenal lesion had decreased from 2.0 to 1.2 cm. There was no significant change in the lung nodules and the thrombus in the IVC had remained stable (Figure 4).
Sutent effectively decreased the size of the tumors. Tumor mass in the lower right pole decreased 15.4%, the right adrenal mass underwent a 26% decrease, the left adrenal mass had a 50% decrease, the IVC thrombus initially decreased 50% after two cycles and now remains stable along with the lung nodules.
The patient has started on her tenth cycle of therapy and is doing very well. None of the masses have increased in size and the patient no longer has side effects to the medication.
Discussion
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma is the most common and one of most resistant tumors in urology with only a less than 10% survival rate for 5 years 1,2 . It is generally characterized by a lack of early warning signs, diverse clinical manifestations, and resistance to radiation and chemotherapy 1,3 .
Over the past few decades there has seemed to be an increase in the incidence of all stages of RCC 3 . It has the reputation of leading to poor prognoses as most therapy ideas seem to have no influence on this disease. Recently, it has been shown that RCC is caused by a loss in the von Hippel Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor gene activity. A mutation in the VHL gene can cause an increase in hypoxia inducible factor-1α, which in turn can cause an increase in both VEGF and PDGF 2,5,6,7,8 .
Currently, the treatment opportunities for metastatic renal cell carcinoma are very limited and there is dire need for a new therapy. Sunitinib malate is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that specifically inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, platelet-derived growth factor receptors, and other tyrosine protein kinases 2 . Due to its affinity for VEGF and PDGF receptors, Sutent is able to effectively work on renal cell carcinoma.
Recently, the first Phase III study proved that Sutent was more efficacious compared to interferon-α. The trial showed that 28% of patients on Sutent had significant tumor shrinkage compared with only 5% of patients who received interferon-α. These results proved that Sutent should now be the gold standard in care for patients with mRCC 9 . Patients receiving sunitinib also reported a significantly better quality of life than those treated with interferon-α 10 .