ISPUB.com / IJSS/4/2/12617
  • Author/Editor Login
  • Registration
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

ISPUB.com

Internet
Scientific
Publications

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Latest Articles
  • Disclaimers
  • Article Submissions
  • Contact
  • Help
  • The Internet Journal of Spine Surgery
  • Volume 4
  • Number 2

Original Article

The Use of rhBMP-2 to Achieve Posterior Cervical Fusion Without Internal Fixation: Report of Three Cases in Adults

D Vargas, A Back, P Shedden

Keywords

arthrodesis, bone morphogenetic proteins, cervical spine, infuse®, posterior cervical fusion, rhbmp-2 bmp

Citation

D Vargas, A Back, P Shedden. The Use of rhBMP-2 to Achieve Posterior Cervical Fusion Without Internal Fixation: Report of Three Cases in Adults. The Internet Journal of Spine Surgery. 2007 Volume 4 Number 2.

Abstract

The use of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) to achieve bony fusion has been reported in conjunction with internal fixation in different locations of the spine. Three cases are presented in which the patients were deemed to have poor quality bone and spinal anatomical abnormalities that prevented the use of traditional fusion methods. Posterior cervical fusion using rh-BMP-2 alone after application of a halo ring and vest was used in these three patients as an alternative method of achieving fusion. To the authors' knowledge, no studies have yet described the use of rh-BMP-2 (INFUSE®) in achieving posterior cervical fusion without internal fixation.

 

Disclosure

In the effort of full disclosure, Peter Shedden MD serves as a medical consultant for Medtronic. Dr. Shedden has not received and will not receive any compensation of any form for the publication of this work. Dr. Shedden also has no benefit of any kind that would result from this publication. The article has been written with full scientific integrity and accurate reporting of all results and discussion.

Introduction

Surgeons have been searching for decades to find bone-grafting materials that would allow them to achieve higher fusion rates and/or eliminate the need for autogenous iliac crest bone harvesting. Fusion rates are known to be impacted by several factors including but not limited to fusion method, age of patient, bone quality, history of smoking, and diabetes mellitus. 18,20,36,38,40 Recent advances in material-based technology and molecular biotechnology have led to the development of new interbody spacers and osteoinductive agents that hold tremendous promise for the future of spine surgery.

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), discovered and named by Marshall Urist, are a component of the bone matrix and are part of a large, multigene family – the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) superfamily. 13,28,43,44,45,49,51,52 Numerous BMPs have been identified with upwards of 20 distinct proteins and can be divided into subgroups based on sequence similarity. 13,14,28,48,49,50,51 BMPs are extracellular, dimeric, low molecular weight, non-collagenous glycoproteins that are involved in regulating proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation. 13,21,25,26,42,44,45 They differ from other proteins (e.g., growth factors) in that they are morphogens. 21,25,26,42,51,52

Several but not all of the BMPs have been shown to be able to induce de novo osteogenesis acting as local mediators of osteogenesis with their affect being concentration dependent. 1,13,16,33,35,36,38,41,44,45,46 Preclinical studies indicate that they induce osteogenesis in a sequential manner and their mode of action includes chemotaxis of cells to the implant site, proliferation of these cells, and finally differentiation of these cells into active osteoblasts. 14,25,26,42,51 The bone tissue that is formed is histologically normal. 38,39

Rh-BMP-2 (INFUSE®, Medtronic Sofamor-Danek, Memphis, TN) which has osteoinductive capacity has been demonstrated to play a critical role in development. 21,39,46,51,54 The safety and efficacy of rh-BMP-2 was extensively studied for decades prior to receiving FDA approval for human use. 23,44,45,46,52

Several human clinical trials have reported rh-BMP-2 usage in oral maxillofacial procedures and in human orthopedic clinical trials for tibial fractures. 3,7,8,15,17,19,22,24,47,53 Although this new technological advance has been known and applied in the lumbar spine for several years, its use in the cervical spine has been limited to the anterior approach in the few sporadic reports in the literature. 2,4,6,6,9,10,11,12,18,20,29,34

We report the clinical outcomes obtained in three patients who underwent posterior cervical fusion using rhBMP-2 with only external fixation. To our knowledge, the use of rhBMP-2 for posterior cervical fusion without internal fixation has not been previously reported.

Case Material

Case 1

A 77-year-old female presented with pain radiating to behind the left ear compatible with occipital neuralgia. She had no complaints of pain, numbness, or tingling in either the shoulder or arm, and was neurologically intact. She had no history of physical injury and the medical history included chronic lymphocytic leukemia and osteoarthritis. Cervical spine x-rays and CT imaging revealed cervical spondylitic disease and severe left C1-C2 facet arthropathy. The patient had failed all conservative options and it was recommended that the patient try a halo to see if external fixation could decrease the pain. The patient had complete resolution of pain and thus fusion was recommended as an option.

Surgical Procedure

The patient was brought to the operating room and was intubated with a cuff endotracheal tube. Initially a right hip graft was harvested from the patient for later use. Subsequently, the patient was placed prone on bolsters, in the halo, and her head was supported and placed in neutral position. At that point the occipital area was shaved, prepped, and draped in an appropriate fashion. Standard approach was performed to expose the occiput, C1, and C2 posterior elements. Intra-operative examination revealed that the C1 arch was fused to the occiput. Although several options were possible, there was concern that adequate internal fixation could not be accomplished successfully. At this point the surgery proceeded with bilateral decortication of the lamina of C1, C2, and also the base of the occiput. Two INFUSE soaked collagen sponges were wrapped around MASTERGRAFT PUTTY and the harvested autogenous bone. These sponges were placed in complete contact with the occiput, C1, and C2 on both sides. No irrigation was done at this point. Standard closure procedures were done. There were no complications during this procedure. Patient remained in halo for 3 months.

Case 2

An 80-year-old female presented with a complaint of bilateral weakness in both arms and tingling in her hands. Weakness was grade 2/5 in her proximal arms. It was noted that the patient had her head in a fixed-tilted position looking to the left. The patient also had deafness in the left ear along with numbness around the left ear and into the left jaw. The medical history was unremarkable except for a fall the patient had 2-years prior to presentation. She had seen multiple physicians over that time and was told there was nothing that could be done for her. After investigations, which included CT/MRI/plain films of cervical spine, she was admitted to the hospital and placed in a halo with 10 lbs of traction. The patient responded to the traction and was able to lift both arms above her head. The investigations had revealed rotation of the dens, medullo-cervical junction compression, and previous C2 fracture with displacement. Application of halo ring and vest were completed and posterior cervical fusion was recommended. Because of experience in case #1 the patient was made aware of the possible use of rh-BMP-2 and the current FDA recommendations.

Surgical Procedure

The patient was taken to the operating room and fiberoptically intubated. All standard preventions were taken for positioning. Her occipital area and post-cervical area were shaved, prepped and draped in appropriate fashion. Standard approach allowed exposure of the occiput, C1, and C2. Very thin bone, poor bone quality, and misaligned C1 and C2 prevented the use of internal fixation of any type. The suboccipital area, the arch of C1, the lamina and the spinous process of C2 were then decorticated. Vitoss® soaked in INFUSE® was used, and was packed from the occiput down to C2 on both sides and along the lamina and spinous processes. There was no irrigation and standard closure procedures were done. There were no complications with the procedure. Patient remained in halo for 3 months.

Case 3

A 71-year-old female patient presented to the emergency room after falling backwards on the tiled kitchen floor, she had a brief loss of consciousness, and noticed some left upper extremity weakness. She was seen in the emergency room and was diagnosed with a C2 avulsion fracture. She was discharged from the ER in a collar and was referred to our office one month later. The fracture was deemed unstable and fortunately the patient was neurologically intact. Evaluation revealed what appeared to evidence of bilateral C2 pars fracture and also a fracture extending through the body of C2. The patient was admitted to the hospital and required 10 lbs of cervical traction for realignment. A long discussion took place with the patient's family and the patient about her various surgical options. Her bone quality was extremely poor. She had multiple medical problems including diabetes mellitus, prior history of smoking, and hypertension. With a halo ring and vest in place, a posterior approach was suggested with the goal of lateral fusion using rh-BMP-2. From our experience with case #1 and 2, the patient was made aware of rh-BMP-2 and what the FDA had approved for its usage.

Surgical Procedure

The patient was brought to the operating room and fiberoptically intubated in standard fashion. All standard preventative measures were taken for positioning. The posterior neck was then shaved, prepped, and draped in appropriate fashion and a standard approach was done to expose the base of the occiput, and thru the C1-C3 vertebra. A generous decortication of the lamina of C1, C2, C3, and the facet joints at C2-3 followed. Options were reviewed and internal fixation was deemed unsafe and not possible. At this point, an INFUSE® soaked collagen sponge was wrapped around MASTERGRAFT® GRANULES (Medtronic Sofamor-Danek, Memphis, TN). It was placed down laterally over the facet joints extending from C1 to the C2/C3 facet joint and along the C3 lamina. There was no irrigation done. Hemostasis was controlled. Standard closure procedures were done. There were no complications during this procedure. Patient remained in halo for 3 months.

Discussion

The three cases presented have shown the effective use of rhBMP-2 in achieving posterior cervical spinal fusion in patients that could not undergo traditional fusion procedures due to poor bone quality and poor cervical anatomy. All three of the patients obtained excellent fusion results, although all had to be treated with a halo ring and vest for 3 months post-surgery. The patient in case 1 had resolution of her pain after fusion. The patient in case 2 obtained increased stability from the fusion and normal neurological function was restored. The patient in case 3 obtained increased stability from the fusion and had minimal complaints of muscular pain. All three patients used a different carrier and bulking agent; however, the specific carrier seems to be independent of successful fusion. Successful fusion seems to be dependent solely on the use of INFUSE® as the source for rh-BMP-2. Figures 1-3 show the x-rays of the posterior fusion achieved in each of the cases. No patient suffered any complication from the surgery, or from the use of rhBMP-2.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Flexion (left) and extension (right) x-rays of case #3 are shown. Arrows indicate fusion between occiput, axis (C1), and atlas (C2).

Figure 2
Figure 2: Flexion (left) and extension (right) x-rays of case #2 are shown. Arrows indicate fusion between occiput, axis (C1), and atlas (C2).

Figure 3
Figure 3: Flextion (left), normal (center), and extension (right) x-rays of Case #1 are shown. Arrows indicate fusion between occiput and axis (C1).

A few studies have indicated adverse responses to the use of rhBMP-2 in anterior cervical fusion such as swelling, increased difficulty in swallowing and breathing. 37,40,41 These adverse effects appear to be associated with higher doses of rhBMP-2 and seem to be minimized through proper planning and usage. 40 Although these studies have noted risk of adverse effects with the use of BMPs, these three cases support the possibility for the safe and effective use of rhBMP-2 in achieving posterior cervical fusion in patients with external fixation. To the author's knowledge, this provides the first report of rh-BMP-2, independent of carrier and bulking agent, used to achieve posterior cervical fusion without use of traditional internal fixation techniques.

Conclusions

Although the use of rhBMP-2 in achieving spinal fusion has been well described, limited literature exists on its use in the cervical region. The limited literature that does exist only describes the use of BMPs in achieving anterior cervical fusion. To the author's knowledge no literature has described the use of rhBMP-2 to achieve posterior cervical fusion. These three cases show the use of rhBMP-2 with external fixation to achieve posterior cervical spinal fusion in patients with poor bone quality and poor cervical anatomy where internal fixation was deemed unsafe.

Correspondence to

Peter M. Shedden M.D. 9200 New Trails, Suite 100 The Woodlands, TX 77381 Phone: 281-364-9509 Fax: 281-364-0984 Email: petermshedden@ghnc.net

References

1. Anderson GD, Andersson BJ, Boden SD, Damien C, Ebara S, Helm G, et al: Summary statement: clinical BMP programs. Spine 27:S49, 2002.
2. Baskin DS, Ryan P, Sonntag V, Westmark R, Widmayer MA: A prospective, randomized, controlled cervical fusion study using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 with the CORNERSTONE-SR allograft ring and the ATLANTIS anterior cervical plate. Spine 28:1219-1224, 2003.
3. Bianchi J, Fiorellini JP, Howell TH, Sekler J, Curtin H, Nevins ML, et al: Measuring the efficacy of rhBMP-2 to regenerate bone: a radiographic study using a commercially available software program. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 24:579-587, 2004.
4. Boakye M, Mummaneni PV, Garrett M, Rodts G, Haid R: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion involving a polyetheretherketone spacer and bone morphogenetic protein. J Neurosurg Spine
2:521-525, 2005.
5. Boden SD, Kang J, Sandhu H, Heller JG: Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 to achieve posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in humans: a prospective, randomized clinical pilot trial: 2002 Volvo Award in clinical studies. Spine
27:2662-2673, 2002.
6. Boden SD, Zdeblick TA, Sandhu HS, Helm SE: The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Definitive evidence of osteoinduction in humans: a preliminary report. Spine
25:376-381, 2000.
7. Boyne PJ: Application of bone morphogenetic proteins in the treatment of clinical oral and maxillofacial osseous defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am
83-A:S146-S150, 2001.
8. Boyne PJ, Marx RE, Nevins M, Triplett G, Lazaro E, Lilly LC, Alder M, Nummikoski P: A feasibility study evaluating rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
17:11-25, 1997.
9. Burkus JK, Dorchak JD, Sanders DL: Radiographic assessment of interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2. Spine
28:372-377, 2003.
10. Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Dickman CA, Zdeblick TA: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2 with tapered interbody cages. J Spinal Disord Tech
15:337-349, 2002.
11. Burkus JK, Sandhu HS, Gornet MF, Longley MC: Use of rhBMP-2 in combination with structural cortical allografts: clinical and radiographic outcomes in anterior lumbar spinal surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am
87:1205-1212, 2005.
12. Burkus JK, Transfeldt EE, Kitchel SH, Watkins RG, Balderston RA: Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine 27:2396-2408, 2002.
13. Celeste AJ, Iannazzi JA, Taylor RC, Hewick RM, Rosen V, Wang EA, et al: Identification of transforming growth factor beta family members present in bone-inductive protein purified from bovine bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:9843-9847, 1990.
14. Cheng H, Jiang W, Phillips FM, Haydon RC, Peng Y, Zhou L, et al: Osteogenic activity of the fourteen types of human bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). J Bone Joint Surg Am
85-A:1544-1552, 2003.
15. Cochran DL, Jones AA, Lilly LC, Fiorellini JP, Howell H: Evaluation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in oral applications including the use of endosseous implants: 3-year results of a pilot study in humans. J Periodontol
71:1241-1257, 2000.
16. David SM, Gruber HE, Meyer RA, Murakami T, Tabor OB, Howard BA, et al: Lumbar spinal fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein in the canine. A comparison of three dosages and two carriers. Spine
24:1973-1979, 1999.
17. Fiorellini JP, Howell TH, Cochran D, Malmquist J, Lilly LC, Spagnoli D, et al: Randomized study evaluating recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for extraction socket augmentation. J Periodontol
76:605-613, 2005.
18. Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Carreon LY, Campbell MJ, Puno RM, Johnson JR: Initial fusion rates with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2/compression resistant matrix and a hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate/collagen carrier in posterolateral spinal fusion. Spine
30:1694-1698, 2005.
19. Govender S, Csimma C, Genant HK, Valentin-Opran A, Amit Y, Abrel R, et al: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for treatment of open tibial fractures: a prospective, controlled, randomized study of four hundred and fifty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am
84-A:2123-2134, 2002.
20. Haid RW, Branch CL, Alexander JT, Burkus JK: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages. Spine J
4:527-538, 2004.
21. Hogan, BL: Bone morphogenetic proteins in development. Curr Opin Genet Dev
6:432-438, 1996.
22. Howell TH, Fiorellini J, Jones A, Alder M, Nummikoski P, Lazaro M, et al: A feasibility study evaluating rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge device for local alveolar ridge preservation or augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 17:124-139, 1997.
23. Israel DI, Nove J, Kerns KM, Moutsatsos IK, Kaufman RJ: Expression and characterization of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Growth Factors
7:139-150, 1992.
24. Jones AL, Bucholz RW, Bosse MJ, Mirza SK, Lyon TR, Webb LX, et al: Recombinant human BMP-2 and allograft compared with autogenous bone graft for reconstruction of diaphyseal tibial fractures with cortical defects. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am
88:1431-1441, 2006.
25. Katagirl T, Yamaguchi A, Komaki M, Abe E, Takahashi N, Ikeda T, et al: Bone morphogenetic protein-2 converts the differentiation pathway of C2C12 myoblasts into the osteoblast lineage. J Cell Biol 127:1755-1766, 1994.
26. Kawasaki K, Aihara M, Honmo J, Sakurai S, Fujimaki Y, Sakamoto K, et al: Effects of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on differentiation of cells isolated from human bone, muscle, and skin. Bone 23:223-231, 1998
27. King GN, Hughes FJ: Bone morphogenetic protein-2 stimulates cell recruitment and cementogenesis during early wound healing. J Clin Periodontol 28:465-475, 2001.
28. Kingsley DM: The TGF-beta superfamily: new members, new receptors, and new genetic tests of function in different organisms. Genes Dev
8:133-146, 1994.
29. Kleeman TJ, Ahn UM, Talbot-Kleeman A: Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2: a prospective study of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine 26:2751-2756, 2001.
30. Kuklo TR, Rosner MK, Polly DW: Computerized tomography evaluation of a resorbable implant after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus
16:E6, 2004.
31. Lanman TH, Hopkins TJ: Early findings in a pilot study of anterior cervical interbody fusion in which recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 was used with poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide) bioabsorbable implants. Neurosurg Focus
16:E6, 2004.
32. Lanman TH, Hopkins TJ: Lumbar interbody fusion after treatment with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 added to poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide) bioresorbable implants. Neurosurg Focus
16:E9, 2004.
33. Liu F, Ventura F, Doody J, Massagué J: Human type II receptor for bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs): extension of the two-kinase receptor model to the BMPs. Mol Cell Biol
15:3479-3486, 1995.
34. Luhmann SJ, Bridwell KH, Cheng I, Imamura T, Lenke LG, Schootman M: Use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 for adult spinal deformity. Spine 30:S110-S117, 2005.
35. Martin GJ, Boden SD, Titus L: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 overcomes the inhibitory effect of ketorolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), on posterolateral lumbar intertransverse process spine fusion. Spine 24:2188-2193, 1999.
36. McKay BM, Sandhu HS: Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in spinal fusion applications. Spine
27:S66-S85, 2002.
37. Perri B, Cooper M, Lauryssen C, Anand N: Adverse swelling associated with use of rh-BMP-2 in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a case study. Spine J 7:235-239, 2007.
38. Sandhu HS, Kanim LE, Kabo JM, Toth JM, Zeegen EN, Liu D, et al: Effective doses of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in experimental spinal fusion. Spine 21:2115-2122, 1996.
39. Sandhu HS, Toth JM, Diwan AD, Seim HB, Kanim LE, Kabo JM, et al: Histologic evaluation of the efficacy of rhBMP-2 compared with autograft bone in sheep spinal anterior interbody fusion. Spine 27:567-575, 2002.
40. Shields LB, Raque GH, Glassman SD, Campbell M, Vitaz T, Harpring J, et al: Adverse effects associated with high-dose recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 use in anterior cervical spine fusion. Spine 31:542-547, 2006.
41. Smucker JD, Rhee JM, Singh K, Yoon ST, Heller JG: Increased Swelling complications associated with off-label usage of rhBMP-2 in the anterior cervical spine. Spine 31:2813-2819, 2006.
42. Thies RS, Bauduy M, Ashton BA, Kurtzberg L, Wozney JM, Rosen V: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 induces osteoblastic differentiation in W-20-17 stromal cells. Endocrinology
130:1318-1324, 1992.
43. Urist MR: Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science
150:893-899, 1965.
44. Urist MR, Mikulski A: Solubilized and insolubilized bone morphogenetic protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
76:1828-1832, 1979.
45. Urist MR, Mikulski A: A soluble bone morphogenetic protein extracted from bone matrix with a mixed aqueous and nonaqueous solvent. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med
162:48-53, 1979.
46. Wang EA, Rosen V, D'Alessandro JS, Bauduy M, Cordes P, Harada T, et al: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein induces bone formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
87:2220-2224, 1990.
47. Welch RD, Jones AL, Bucholz RW, Reinert CM, Tjia JS, Pierce WA, et al: Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on fracture healing in a goat tibial fracture model. J Bone Miner Res
13:1483-1490, 1998.
48. Wozney JM: The bone morphogenetic protein family and osteogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev 32:160-167, 1992.
49. Wozney JM: The bone morphogenetic protein family: multifunctional cellular regulators in the embryo and adult. Eur J Oral Sci
106:160-166, 1998.
50. Wozney JM: Overview of bone morphogenetic proteins. Spine
27:S2-S8, 2002.
51. Wozney JM, Rosen V: Bone morphogenetic protein and bone morphogenetic protein gene family in bone formation and repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res
346:26-37, 1998.
52. Wozney JM, Rosen V, Celeste AJ, Mitsock LM, Whitters MJ, Kriz RW, Hewick RM, Wang EA: Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities. Science
242:1528-1534, 1988.
53. Yasko AW, Lane JM, Fellinger EJ, Rosen V, Wozney JM, Wang EA: The healing of segmental bone defects, induced by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). A radiographic, histological, and biomechanical study in rats. J Bone Joint Surg Am
74:659-670, 1992.
54. Zhang H, Bradley A: Mice deficient for BMP2 are nonviable and have defects in amnion/chorion and cardiac development. Development 122:2977-2986, 1996.

Author Information

Daniel Vargas, MD
Greater Houston Foundation for Medical Research and Education

Adam G. Back, BS
Greater Houston Foundation for Medical Research and Education

Peter M. Shedden, MD
Greater Houston Foundation for Medical Research and Education

Download PDF

Your free access to ISPUB is funded by the following advertisements:

 

BACK TO TOP
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

© 2013 Internet Scientific Publications, LLC. All rights reserved.    UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy