Quick Review: Mesothelioma
B Phillips
Citation
B Phillips. Quick Review: Mesothelioma. The Internet Journal of Pulmonary Medicine. 2002 Volume 3 Number 1.
Abstract
This article reviews briefly the main points of mesotheliomas.
Definition and History
The term was first used in 1921 by Eastwood & Martin to describe primary tumors of the pleura
-
At that time, the diagnosis was extremely controversial (required autopsy examination)
-
Today, the diagnosis is still problematic
-
-
15 % of cases can not be differentiated from adenocarcinoma
-
-
Wagner, South African miners [Br J Ind Med]
-
-
first evidence implicating asbestos in the pathogenesis
-
landmark paper, began widespread investigation
-
-
Incidence has reached “Epidemic”
-
-
European Experience: Expected Peak, 2010 - 2020 (2,700 - 9,000 deaths/yr.)
-
U.S. Experience: Peaked in the 1970's & since 1980 the incidence has been decreasing
-
The increase in general incidence has been attributed to the widespread use of asbestos in the post-World War II period [McDonald 1987]
-
Precautions were first taken in the U.S.
-
Europe was “slow” to respond
-
Effect on third-world countries
-
Industrialized Countries
-
-
2 per million in females
-
10 - 30 per million in males regional differences are due to the level of industrial activity
-
-
Areas with shipyards are at the highest risk
-
Type is also a Factor: Crocidolite & Amosite > Chrysotile
The occurrence of mesothelioma is related to an
Non-occupational environmental exposure leading to it's development is uncommon
-
Only 7.2 % of asbestos workers, will develop the disease
-
Up to 50 % of patients, do not have any history of exposure
Cases due to exposure in buildings with asbestos insulation are extremely rare !
The Risk
[Hughes et al. 1986: “
[Lilienfield 1991: “
There has never been prospective evidence to support the widespread removal of asbestos insulation...
3 Main Groups:
-
Benign Localized Mesothelioma
-
-
“pleural fibroma”
-
Unassociated with asbestos exposure
-
Paraneoplastic syndromes occur in 1/3
-
-
Migrating Thrombitis
-
Thrombocytosis
-
Hemolytic Anemia
-
Hypoglycemia
-
Hypercalcemia
-
Pulmonary Hypertrophic Osteoarthropathy [Boutin 1998]
-
-
Arise from the visceral pleura
-
Unless incomplete, surgical resection is curative
-
-
Malignant Localized Mesothelioma
-
-
20 % of all primary malignant pleural tumors are localized
-
Present as Symptomatic Masses
-
Difficult to differentiate from Chest Wall Neoplasms
-
Treatment
-
-
Wide enbloc excision of all involved tissue
-
Lung, Chest Wall, Soft Tissues, & Skin
-
With incomplete excision, the prognosis approaches MDM
-
External beam radiation is of little benefit
-
-
-
Malignant Diffuse Mesothelioma
-
-
Classical form
-
Related to exposure
-
Latent Period of 20 years
-
Smoking is an associated factor
-
-
not for mesothelioma, but for overall survival rate
-
-
Typical Scenario
Middle-aged man with pleuritic chest pain, shortness of breath, & a clear history of asbestos exposure
3 Cell Types:
-
Epithelial Type : 50 % of cases
-
-
most often confused with adenocarcinoma
-
-
Mesenchymal Type : 16 % of cases
-
Mixed Type : 34 % of cases
Pathogenecity:
Benign pleural plaques are the most common manifestation of asbestos exposure
-
usually develop on the parietal or diaphragmatic pleura
-
malignant mesothelioma is thought to originate from the parietal pleura
-
high concentrations of asbestos fibers in the lung are associated with bronchial carcinoma [Antilla 1993]
Clinical Points:
-
Mean Age of Patients: 60
-
-
has been reported in children (unrelated to asbestos) [Fraire 1988]
-
-
Clinical signs/symptoms depend on the stage
-
-
TNM Classification
-
Early-Stage Disease: Symptoms are Rare
-
Late-Stage Disease: Pain, Dyspnea, Moderate Effusion
-
The initial chest radiograph leading to a diagnosis of mesothelioma reveals a pleural effusion 92 % of the time
-
7 % of the time, a Multinodular Pleural Tumor was found
-
0.5 % of the time, an Empyema
-
0.5 % of the time, a Spontaneous Pneumothorax [Boutin 1993]
On thoracentesis, the pleural fluid is an
-
Cytology of the fluid is 30 % sensitive![Renshaw 1997]
-
Removal of the pleural fluid improves the possibility of establishing the diagnosis
Diagnostic Work-Up
-
CXR (with thoracentesis)
-
Chest C.T.
-
-
irregular, nodular pleural thickening
-
spread into the diaphragm, pericardium, chest wall, or mediastinal lymph nodes is difficult to assess [Masilta 1991]
-
-
Thoracoscopy with Biopsy
-
MRI
Staging
-
Stage I : tumor isolated to ipsilateral pleura or lung
-
Stage II: tumor invades chest wall, mediastinum, pericardium, or contralateral pleura
-
Stage III: tumor involves both thorax & abdomen
-
Stage IV: distant blood-borne metastases
Expected Survival:
-
Stage I: 16 months
-
Stage II: 9 months
-
Stage III: 5 months[Cohen 1995]
Establishing the Diagnosis
Thoracoscopy is indicated in any patient without a precise histopathological diagnosis in whom clinical & laboratory findings raise the suspicion of mesothelioma
-
Cardinal Characteristics
-
-
Age between 55 – 65
-
Previous occupational exposure to asbestos
-
Pleural Effusion
-
C.T. / MRI (with nodular lesions of the parietal pleura) [Boutin 1998]
-
-
VATS
-
-
Mesothelioma takes on a “grape-like” appearance
-
-
patches of closely-spaced, smooth, translucid, poorly-vascularized nodules with a clear to yellowish color
-
-
not unique to mesothelioma
-
also seen with metastatic cancer of the pleura Unlike benign inflammation (pleurisy), the pleura becomes hard & non-elastic - with biopsy, the cut edges do not bleed
-
-
-
10 - 15 % of cases, the observed lesions are nonspecific
-
-
path report: “benign pleural inflammation”
-
-
The more unimpressive the picture, the more biopsies should be taken (up to 20)
-
Look for involvement of the Lung or Visceral Pleura
-
98 % sensitive in establishing the diagnosis
-
Mortality is 1:8000
-
Complications are minimal
-
-
Subcutaneous Emphysema
-
Localized Infection
-
Minor Bleeding (< 100 cc)[Viallat 1991]
-
-
1 Problem with VATS: Seeding of the Trocar Path
-
-
unknown incidence but can occur
-
has been documented after thoracentesis & blind pleural biopsy
-
-
Can be prevented by performing Prophylactic Radiotherapy after healing to the point of entry
Natural History
-
Median Survival : 12 - 17 months
-
5-year Survival : < 5 %
-
Mesothelioma is a Local Disease
-
-
Invasion usually first involves the Lung & Diaphragm
-
-
Progressive Retraction of the hemithorax leading to a “trapped lung”
-
Peritoneal Infiltration - through the diaphragm or it's posterior openings with secondary ascites
-
-
-
Spread to the Endothoracic Fascia (T2) or Intercostal Spaces (T3) is common
-
-
Found in 30 - 50 % of patients at the time of biopsy[Chahinian 1983]
-
Parietal involvement can be “massive”
-
UNCOMMON:
-
-
Clinically-detectable lesions in bone, tissue, or brain
-
Involvement of the contralateral lung
-
-
However, at the time of autopsy, 50 % of patients will have metastatic spread [Antman 1981]. Death is usually due to progressive dyspnea & respiratory insuffiency with extensive weight loss & muscle wasting
There is no single treatment which has proven effective...
Treatment: Surgery
To ensure that surgery will be as curative as possible, resection
-
the Pleura: Stage Ia
-
the Lung: Stages Ib, II, and III
Many cases will require resection of the diaphragm, pericardium, & chest wall; but does surgery improve survival?
-
Worn 1974, 248 Patients
-
-
62 Patients with Radical Pneumonectomy
-
-
2-yr. Survival, 37 % 5-yr. Survival, 10 %
-
-
Conservative Treatment
-
-
2-yr. Survival, 12.5 % 5-yr. Survival, 0 %
-
-
-
Probst 1990, 111 cases
-
-
Median survival was longer after pneumonectomy than any other method (1.4 months)
-
Operative mortality for radical pneumonectomy, across the board, is 25 %
A current review of all surgical series suggests that treatment protocols including surgery do extend survival...
-
Pleurectomy(2-yr. Survival): 11- 35 %
-
Radical Pneumonectomy: 10 - 37 % [Boutin 1998]Aisner 1995
-
-
The only prospective study
-
Pneumonectomy, w/o post-operative treatment
-
-
2-yr. Survival: 33 %
-
Median Survival: 10 months
-
-
A prospective, randomized, phase III trial is required to find the appropriate role of surgery.
Treatment: Radiation
Despite in-vivo success against mesothelial cells, this mode has not been proven successful in the clinical setting
-
Problem: size of the target area
-
Post-radiation fibrosis can further aggravate pain
-
-
via compression of the chest wall & intercostal nerves
-
-
Is effective to prevent “seeding”
Treatment: Chemotherapy
Responses seen in 20 -30 % of patients, but without improvement in overall mortality
-
Doxorubicin
-
Cisplatin
-
Methotrexate
-
Combined Protocols : 33 - 66 % response
Treatment: Immunotherapy
-
Intrapleural delivery of cytokines are currently being tested
-
-
Interferon-Gamma
-
Interleukin-2
-
-
Studies began in 1987 (150 patients)
-
-
Response Rates: 6 - 44 %
-
Effect on Survival is unknown at present [Dreisen 1992]
-
Treatment: Gene Therapy
trials have begun to evaluate the genetic transfer of thymidine kinase
** too early to judge effect or outcome...
Summary
-
Early-stage disease: most important predictor of outcome
-
To find “early-stage disease”, remember the risk factors
-
-
Age between 55 – 65
-
Previous occupational exposure to asbestos
-
Pleural Effusion
-
C.T. / MRI (with nodular lesions of the parietal pleura)
-
-
Diagnosis is best established by V.A.T.S.
-
-
Following invasive procedures, “seeding” will occur & should be treated by radiotherapy
-
-
Treatment: “it is currently, the clinician's choice”
-
-
Multimodal approach including radical surgery
-
“Limited-Role for Limited-Surgery”
-
-
Palliative
-
Relief of symptoms
-
-