Evaluation of Invitro and Invivo Antioxidant Activity of Oscillatoria annae
R Rajavel, T Sivakumar, M Jagadeeswaran, V Rajesh, P Malliga
Keywords
catalase, glutathione., invitro - antioxidant activity, oscillatoria annae
Citation
R Rajavel, T Sivakumar, M Jagadeeswaran, V Rajesh, P Malliga. Evaluation of Invitro and Invivo Antioxidant Activity of Oscillatoria annae. The Internet Journal of Pharmacology. 2010 Volume 9 Number 2.
Abstract
In the present study, the ethanol extract of
Introduction
Recently, health beneficial effects of marine cynobacterium are attracting much attention as biological response modifier because of the wide range of Physiological activities.
National cancer institute (NCI) scientists have screened 18,000 extracts of marine organism for activity against tumors, viruses and fungi and for immune system stimulation properties. In 1996, the NCI began studying thousands of types of blue-green algae for effects against the AIDS virus and 100 types of cancer. In 1989, the NCI announced that chemicals from blue-green algae were found remarkably active against AIDS virus (Gustafson
It is now becoming evident that marine organisms are emerging as a significant chemical resource with novel compounds in clinical trials deriving from these microorganisms.
Natural products isolated from marine organisms have been found to be a very rich source of bioactive molecules. Reported biological effects of these compounds include anti-tumour, anti-inflammatory and antiviral as well as immunomodulatory and analgesic properties ( Sundaraj Rajmanikandan
Marine natural products offer challenging targets to synthetic chemists due to their complicated structure that exhibits remarkable biological activities.
In the present study, we focused our attention to evaluate the anti-oxidative activity of
Human body cells utilize oxygen to breakdown biomolecules for the generation of energy. Free radicals are produced in this process in the form of byproducts. These free radicals are highly active because they possess unpaired electrons. Normally free radicals are beneficial for oxidative energy production and killing the invaded bacteria into the cells. Almost all cells possess antioxidant defense and repair system to protect them against oxidative damages but unfortunately not sufficient entirely all the time (Indira and Kausalya, 2010).
The oxygen centered free radicals are called reactive oxygen species (ROS) which includes superoxide anion radical (O-
2), hydroxyl radical (OH-), nitric oxide (NO-) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and other molecules. In healthy individuals, the production of free radicals is balanced with the anti-oxidative defense system. When this equilibrium gets unbalanced, it results the generation of free radicals beyond the limit and ultimately depletion of antioxidant levels. Exogenous free radical when coupled with endogenous free radicals result the elevation of ROS which consequences oxidation of cellular lipids, nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates and other biomolecules and leads to a number of diseases like cancer, atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart diseases and various other degenerative diseases (Saikat Dewanjee
Antioxidants play important role against oxidative damage of ROS. Antioxidants are important in the prevention of human diseases by functioning either as free radical scavengers, complexers of Pro-oxidant metals, reducing agents or quenchers of singlet oxygen formation.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Preparation of Extract
About 50gms of powdered
Invitro Antioxidant Activity
DPPH free radical scavenging activity
The scavenging of DPPH free radicals was used for measuring the antioxidant activity of the extracts according to the method of Blois, 1958. Briefly, stock solutions of the extracts were prepared by dissolving 0.1g of dry extract in 50ml of 50% methanolic solution. The stock solution was diluted with 50% methanolic solution to obtain sample solutions at the concentrations of 1,10,50,100,250,500,1000µg/ml (Wanlop weecharangsan
The antioxidant activity of the extract was expressed as IC50, defined as the concentration of the extract required to inhibit DPPH radicals by 50% using the exponential curve.
Nitric oxide scavenging activity
This Method is based on the principle that Sodium nitro prusside in aqueous solution at physiological pH spontaneously generates nitric oxide which further interacts with oxygen to produce nitrite ion that can be estimated using Griess reagent.
Scavenger of nitric oxide competes with oxygen leading to reduced production of nitrite ion. For experimental, sodium nitroprusside (10mM) in phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.4) was mixed with different concentration of extract (1,10,50,100,250,500,1000µg/ml) in respective solvent and incubated at 250C for 150 min. The same reaction mixture without extract but with equivalent amount of ethanol serves as control. After incubation period, 1.5ml of the incubated solution were removed and diluted with 1.5ml of Griess reagent (1% Sulphanilamide, 2% Phosphoric acid and 0.1% Naphthyl ethelene diamine dihydrochloride). The absorbance of the chromophore formed during diazotization of the nitrite with sulphanilamide and subsequent coupling with naphthyl ethelenediamine was measured at 546nm (Tenpe
Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Activity
Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity was measured by studying the competition between deoxyribose and test compound for hydroxyl radicals generated by Fenton reaction (Fe3+/ascorbate/EDTA/H2O2System).
The hydroxyl radical attacks deoxyribose, which results in thiobarbituric acid reacting substance (TBARS) formation. The formed TBARS were measured (Tatjana Kadifkova Panovska
The extracts were added to the reaction mixture containing 2.8mmol deoxyribose, 100µmol Fecl3, 104µmol EDTA, 100µmol ascorbic acid, 1mmol H2O2 and 230mmol phosphate buffer (pH7.4), making a final volume of 100ml. The mixture was incubated at 370C for 1 hour. One milliliter of thiobarbituric acid TBA (1%) and 1.0ml Thiochloro acetic acid (TCA 2.8%) were added to the test tube and incubated at 1000C for 20minutes. After cooling, absorbance was measured at 532nm against blank containing deoxyribose and buffer. Reactions were carried out in triplicate.
Invivo Antioxidant activity
Albino wistar rats weighing (150-200gms) were used for the study. The animals were procured from Agricultural University, manuthy. Trissur and were housed under standard environmental conditions. They were fed with standard diet and water
The animals were divided into five groups of six animals each. Group I served as normal control group received vechile 0.5% w/v carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC) 1ml/kg orally for seven days. Group II served as CCl4 induced oxidative stress group received vechile 0.5% w/v CMC 1ml/kg orally for seven days. Group III and Group IV animals received the ethanol extract of
Statistical Analysis
The results were subjected to statistical analysis by ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results and Discussion
In the present study, the invitro antioxidant activity of ethanol extract of
DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Activity
The DPPH radical is considered to be a model of lipophilic radical. A chain reaction in lipophilic radical was initiated by lipid auto oxidation. Several concentrations of extract ranging from 1µg/ml to 1000 µg/ml were tested for DPPH scavenging activity. A steady increase in percentage scavenging activity was observed with ethanol extract of
Figure 3
Values are mean ± SD of Triplicate determinations
Nitric Oxide Scavenging Activity
Invitro inhibition of nitric oxide radical is a measure of antioxidant activity. Ethanol extract of
Values are mean ± SD of Triplicate determinations
Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Activity
Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity was measured by studying the competition between deoxyribose and test compound for hydroxyl radical generated for Fenton reaction. The result of hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of ethanol extract of
Values are mean + SD of Triplicate determinations
Invivo Antioxidant Activity
The invivo antioxidant activity of ethanol extract of
Figure 9
Values are mean ± SEM. n = 6 in each group
Values are significantly different from hepatotoxic control (CCl4) by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnetts test *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Acknowledgment
The authors are thankful to the Chairman Thiru. V. Shanmugam B.Com., Nandha Educational Trust, Erode and Mr. S. Nandhakumar Pradeep, Secretary, Nandha Educational Trust, Erode, Tamil Nadu, INDIA for providing necessary facilities to carry out the research work.