ISPUB.com / IJOS/3/1/7857
  • Author/Editor Login
  • Registration
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

ISPUB.com

Internet
Scientific
Publications

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Latest Articles
  • Disclaimers
  • Article Submissions
  • Contact
  • Help
  • The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery
  • Volume 3
  • Number 1

Original Article

Ewing's Sarcoma / PNET: A Histopathological Review

S Jayakumar, D Power

Keywords

ewing's family of tumours, ewing's sarcoma, pnet

Citation

S Jayakumar, D Power. Ewing's Sarcoma / PNET: A Histopathological Review. The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery. 2005 Volume 3 Number 1.

Abstract

Ewing's sarcomas (EWS) / Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumours (PNET) are small round cell tumours occurring in bone and soft tissues, characterized as a group by the presence of the typical translocation t (11; 22) (q24; q12) and its variants. Diagnosis requires histopathological examination, immunohistochemistry and cytogenetics. There is a spectrum of histological appearance, which reflects the degree of neuroectodermal differentiation in these tumours posing diagnostic difficulties. The current concepts in diagnosing these tumours and the clinical impact of neural differentiation are discussed.

 

Introduction

Primitive neuroectodermal tumour is a malignant neoplasm that originates from the cells of the primitive neural crest. It was first coined for a group of embryonal tumors located in the central nervous system (cPNET). More recently, the PNET concept has been expanded to include histologically similar, peripherally located tumours, referred to as peripheral PNET's [pPNET's]1. Among the cPNET's are medulloblastoma, pineoblastoma, cerebral neuroblastoma, ependymoblastoma, medulloepithelioma, primary rhabdomyosarcoma, and atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour 2. The pPNET is part of the Ewing's sarcoma family of tumours, which includes Ewing's sarcoma of bone, extraosseous Ewing's tumour and primitive neuroectodermal tumour3. Various synonyms including peripheral neuroepithelioma, peripheral neuroblastoma, and Askin tumour have been used to describe peripherally occurring primitive neuroectodermal tumours4.

Discussion

Ewing's sarcoma (EWS) / peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour (PNET) are small round cell tumours occurring in bone and soft tissues, characterized as a group by the presence of the typical translocation t (11; 22) (q24; q12) and its variants5. EWS/PNET's are most common in children and young adults. The tumours usually involve bone or soft tissue within the limbs. These tumours have also been described in the mandible, kidney, parotid gland, chest wall, ovary, rectum, gall bladder, retroperitoneal cavity, myocardium6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15. The tumours are rare and aggressive, with a tendency to recur and to metastasize especially to lungs, bone marrow, brain and lymph nodes16.

Histological differential diagnosis of EWS/PNET includes rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma (NBT) and lymphomas. EWS/PNET's are difficult to distinguish from other tumours on the basis of cytology and histology alone1. Diagnosis requires histopathological examination, immunohistochemistry and cytogenetics. Microscopically, EWS/PNET are composed of uniform small round cells with round nuclei containing fine chromatin, scanty clear or eosinophillic cytoplasm, and indistinct cytoplasmic membranes. The term Ewing's sarcoma has been used for those tumours that lack evidence of neuroectodermal differentiation, whereas, the term PNET has been employed for tumours that demonstrate neuroectodermal features17.

Neural differentiation in EWS/PNET tumours can be assessed at the histological, immunohistochemical, and electron microscopic level. The identification of a point of transition between EWS/PNET in a continuous spectrum of neural differentiation is still a matter of debate18.

Histologically, there is a spectrum of appearances which reflects the degree of neuroectodermal differentiation. Tumours at the poorly differentiated (Ewing's) end of spectrum have scanty, pale cytoplasm and round to ovoid open nuclei with finely distributed chromatin pattern. At the opposite end of the spectrum the cells may have somewhat eosinophilic cytoplasm and the chromatin pattern may be coarser with more frequent nucleoli19. Mitotic figures are common in PNET, as are necrosis and endothelial hyperplasia20. A further aid in the differential diagnosis is provided by the presence of Homer-Wright rosettes in PNET's21.

EWS/PNET's are characterized by immunoreactivity for the surface antigen CD99/ MIC2, which is expressed in up to 97%of cases18. The demonstration of immunoreaction with the p30/32 MIC2 antigen (CD99) is however not confined to PNET/EWS. Studies have also demonstrated positive staining to CD99 in acute lymphoblastic lymphoma, related leukaemias, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma and granulocytic sarcoma (acute myeloid leukaemia) 23.

The EWS/PNET spectrum shows immunohistochemical evidence of neuroectodermal differentiation by positivity for antigens such as NSE, PGP 9.5, neurofilament, Leu-7 and synaptophysin19. A positivity of these markers is more commonly seen in PNET's. Neurofilament expression appears to be a more specific marker, but its frequency is generally low in this family of tumours18.

Electron Microscopy Has Been Used To Study The Cells Of EWS/PNET In Detail.

Neurosecretory granules and neurite-like cytoplasmic processes are features of neuronal differentiation that can be recognized in PNET/EWS at the ultrastructural level18. There is a comparable spectrum of differentiation ranging from the traditional paucity of organelles and copious glycogen at the Ewing's end, through the acquisition of microtubule and neurosecretory granules, to the well formed neuritic processes at the PNET end19.

If both immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy are used in association to assess neural differentiation, then the number of well -differentiated tumours recognised would be higher than if only one of the two techniques is used18.

EWS/PNET's are capable of epithelial differentiation; with consequent diagnostic difficulties. In the presence of cytokeratin expression, a poorly differentiated carcinoma should be considered. However cytokeratin expression is present in as many as 20% of EWS/PNET in either a diffuse or focal pattern23. A study conducted on 12 well-documented EWS/PNET's that stained strongly for pankeratin by immunohistochemistry showed that keratin-positive EWS/PNET's have evidence of epithelial differentiation ultrastructurally, and may possibly represent a more aggressive subset of the EWS/PNET group of tumours24.

Cytogenetic Studies In EWS/PNET Reveal A Typical EWS-FLI-1 Fusion Transcript. PNET and EWS Carry Identical Chromosomal Translocations – T (11; 22) (Q24; Q12), Which Results In The Fusion Of The Fli-1 Gene On 11q24 And The Ews Gene On 22q12. This Is The Most Specific Feature For Diagnosis Of Pnet/Ews Tumours And Can Be Readily Detected Using The Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (Rt-Pcr) 24.

Different histopathological appearance is an important prognostic variable. There have been conflicting results in the literature concerning the impact of neural differentiation on the prognosis. The results of a study done in 2001, do not demonstrate a relationship between histological features and the prognosis. This does not support the concept that tumours with more extensive neural differentiation may carry a poorer prognosis25. In another study the patients with tumour expression of one neural marker had 57% 3-year EFS, whereas those with two or more neural markers had 48% 3-year EFS (P = .94) 26. A study on 63 patients by Parham et al, showed neural differentiation had no prognostic significance27.

Conclusion

Ewing's sarcomas (EWS) and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumours (PNET) are small round cell tumours that belong to the Ewing's family of tumours. Diagnosis requires histopathological examination, immunohistochemistry and cytogenetics. There is a spectrum of histological appearance, which reflects the degree of neuroectodermal differentiation in these tumours posing diagnostic difficulties. The prognostic significance of neural differentiation in EWS/PNET remains a controversial issue.

Correspondence to

Dr. S Jayakumar Department Of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, B31 2ap, Uk Tel No: 00441216854000 Fax No: 00441216854162 Email: Jayshivshank@Yahoo.Co.In

References

1. Pereira CM, de Abreu Alves F, Correa ME, Lima CS, de Almeida OP. Mouth metastasis of peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Oral Dis. 2005 Jan;11(1):44-5.
2. Vogel H, Fuller GN. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors, embryonal tumors, and other small cell and poorly differentiated malignant neoplasms of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2003 Dec;7(6):387-98.
3. Miyamoto S, Nakadate H, Nakayama M, Yao K and Okamoto M. A case of primitive neuroectodermal tumor (pnet) of the larynx. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Aug;131(2):310-311.
4. Molenaar WM, Trojanowski JQ. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the central nervous system in childhood: tumor biological aspects. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1994 Aug;17(1):1-25.
5. Hofbauer S, Hamilton G, Theyer G, Wollmann K, Gabor F. Insulin-like growth factor-I-dependent growth and in vitro chemosensitivity of Ewing's sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour cell lines. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A (2):241-5.
6. Sundine MJ, Bumpous JM. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the mandible: report of a rare case. Ear Nose Throat J. 2003 Mar;82(3):211-4.
7. Zini L, Nataf A, Fantoni JC, Villers A, Leroy X, Koussa M, Lemaitre L, Biserte J. Primary neuroectodermal tumour of the kidney invading the wall of the inferior vena cava. Surgical strategy. Prog Urol. 2004 Sep;14(4):544-7.
8. Charney DA, Charney JM, Ghali VS, Teplitz C. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the myocardium: a case report, review of the literature, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study. Hum Pathol. 1996 Dec;27(12):1365-9.
9. Deb RA, Desai SB, Amonkar PP, Aiyer PM, Borges AM. Primary primitive neuroectodermal tumour of the parotid gland. Histopathology. 1998 Oct;33(4):375-8.
10. Horiguchi Y, Nakashima J, Ishii T, Hata J, Tazaki H. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the retroperitoneal cavity. Urology. 1994 Jul;44(1):127-9.
11. Miller JA, Tomkovich K, Romberger C. Primitive neuroectodermal tumour of the chest wall (Askin tumour): CT and roentgenographic findings in a 51-year-old male. Respir Med. 1995 Nov;89(10):705-8.
12. Scherr GR, d'Ablaing G 3rd, Ouzounian JG. Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol. 1994 Aug;54(2):254-8.
13. Song DE, Choi G, Jun SY, Ro JY. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the gallbladder. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004 May;128(5):571-3.
14. Drut R, Drut M, Muller C, Marron A. Rectal primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Pediatr Pathol Mol Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;22(5):391-8.
15. Kim KJ, Jang BW, Lee SK, Kim BK, Nam SL. A case of peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the ovary. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004 Mar-Apr;14(2):370-2.
16. Helsel JC, Mrak RE, Hanna E, Parham DH, Bardales RH. Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the parotid gland region: report of a case with fine-needle aspiration findings. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000 Mar;22(3):161-6.
17. Fletcher CDM, Unni K, Mertens F. World health organisation classification of tumours: Pathoilogy and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Lyon: IARC Press, 2002:298-300.
18. Franchi A, Pasquinelli G, Cenacchi G, Della Rocca C, Gambini C, Bisceglia M, Martinelli GN, Santucci M. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural investigation of neural differentiation in Ewing sarcoma/PNET of bone and soft tissues. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2001 May-Jun;25(3):219-25.
19. Fletcher CDM. Diagnostic histopathology of tumors, 2nd Ed. Churchill Livingstone, 2000 Sep;(2):1698-1700.
20. Bellis EH, Salcman M, Bastian FO. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor in a 57-year-old man. Surg Neurol. 1983 Jul;20(1):30-5.
21. Quinlan JF, Healy CF, Royston D, Murray P. PNET of the hallux. Ir Med J. 2004 Apr;97(4):118.
22. Sur M, Cooper K. PNETs everywhere. Histopathology. 1999 Sep;35(3):279-80.
23. Gu M, Antonescu CR, Guiter G, Huvos AG, Ladanyi M, Zakowski MF. Cytokeratin immunoreactivity in Ewing's sarcoma: prevalence in 50 cases confirmed by molecular diagnostic studies.Am J Surg Pathol. 2000 Mar;24(3):410-6.
24. Srivastava A, Rosenberg AE, Selig M, Rubin BP, Nielsen GP. Keratin-positive Ewing's sarcoma: an ultrastructural study of 12 cases. Int J Surg Pathol. 2005 Jan;13(1):43-50.
25. Oberlin O, Deley MC, Bui BN, Gentet JC, Philip T, Terrier P, Carrie C, Mechinaud F, Schmitt C, Babin-Boillettot A, Michon J. Prognostic factors in localized Ewing's tumours and peripheral neuroectodermal tumours: the third study of the French Society of Paediatric Oncology (EW88 study). Br J Cancer. 2001 Nov 30;85(11):1646-54.
26. Bacci G, Ferrari S, Bertoni F, Donati D, Bacchini P, Longhi A, Brach Del Prever A, Forni C, Rimondini S. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for peripheral malignant neuroectodermal tumor of bone: recent experience at the istituto rizzoli. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(4):885-92.
27. Parham DM, Hijazi Y, Steinberg SM, Meyer WH, Horowitz M, Tzen CY, Wexler LH, Tsokos M. Neuroectodermal differentiation in Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors does not predict tumor behavior. Hum Pathol. 1999 Aug;30(8):911-8.

Author Information

S. Jayakumar
Department Of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital

D. Power
Department Of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital

Download PDF

Your free access to ISPUB is funded by the following advertisements:

 

BACK TO TOP
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

© 2013 Internet Scientific Publications, LLC. All rights reserved.    UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy