ISPUB.com / IJMB/7/1/7296
  • Author/Editor Login
  • Registration
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

ISPUB.com

Internet
Scientific
Publications

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Latest Articles
  • Disclaimers
  • Article Submissions
  • Contact
  • Help
  • The Internet Journal of Microbiology
  • Volume 7
  • Number 1

Original Article

Hexavalent chromium reduction and 16S rDNA identification of bacteria isolated from a Cr (VI) contaminated site

A Das, S Mishra

Keywords

16s rdna, brevibacterium casei, detoxification, hexavalent chromium

Citation

A Das, S Mishra. Hexavalent chromium reduction and 16S rDNA identification of bacteria isolated from a Cr (VI) contaminated site. The Internet Journal of Microbiology. 2008 Volume 7 Number 1.

Abstract

A Gram-positive, hexavalent chromium [chromate: Cr (VI)]-resistant & reducing bacterium, isolated from sukind chromite mines, jajpur, India, was identified as a Brevibacterium casei(Gene Bank Accession Number: EU781952) by gene sequence homology. The strain(designated as APD15) could tolerate chromium up to a maximum concentration of 500 ppm, at optimum temperature and pH 300C and 7 for maximum chromium reduction. Agar supplemented with 100g Cr (VI)/ml as K2Cr2O7 and 0.5% (w/v) dextrose used as a carbon source. The results of the study indicated removal of more than 94% chromium (VI) by Brevibacterium caseidetermined by diphenylcarbazide colorimetric assay.

 

Introduction

Hexavlent Chromium is widely use in various industrial and viable processes, including mining, electroplating, leather tanning, petroleum refining, textiles inorganic chemicals and pulp production, and many other metal finishing industries (Wang and Xiao 1995) & is considered as a serious environmental pollutant. Chromium exists in the environment in several diverse forms such as trivalent [Cr (III)] and hexavalent [Cr (VI)], (Fendorf 1995) of which hexavalent chromium is a so-called carcinogen and a potential soil, surface water and ground water contaminant. Whereas it’s reduced trivalent form (Cr3 + ) is much less toxic, insoluble and a vital nutrient for humans. Cr (III) occurs naturally in the environment and is an essential nutrient required by the human body (Mishra & Das 2007). In India, Sukinda mines in Jajpur district of Orissa state witnesses a vast mining and mineral processing waste that are continuously discharged into open fields and are gradually becoming a source of Cr toxicity for human life, environment and animals and hence pose a serious threat to the inhabitants of this region. About 26 lakhs people residing on the banks of Brahmini River have fallen prey to water contamination due to Chromite mines discharged water which has been highlighted by the Blacksmith Institute. Hence there is an urgent need to reduce Cr (VI) contamination in this region. Recently, bioremediation of Cr (VI) has gained considerable consideration (Wang et al. 1989; Yamamoto et al. 1993; Middleton et al. 2003). Some microbial species can utilize Cr (VI) as a terminal electron acceptor in their respiratory process and transform Cr (VI) to less toxic Cr (III) compounds (Lovley and Phillips 1994; Shen et al. 1996). A number of these microorganisms, particularly bacteria, can reduce Cr and therefore detoxify it (Fuji et al. 1990). The present study describes a microbiological treatment for industrial effluent that may be suitable for processing Cr-contaminated waste. This study proposes a remediation route for detoxification of Cr (VI) using an indigenous microorganism.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Four strains used in this study were originally isolated by Mr. A.P. Das sukind chromite mines, jajpur, India. Bacterial strains, resistant to Cr (VI), were isolated from the soil using the serial dilution technique in PYE medium (Peptone, Yeast extract). Agar supplemented with 100g Cr (VI)/ml as K2Cr2O7 and 0.5% (wt/vol) dextrose served as carbon source. The pH was maintained at 7±0.2 by using HCl or NaOH. The isolates are tested for their chromate tolerance at different concentrations (12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100l/ml) of hexavalent chromium supplemented as K2Cr2O7. Significant growth of the specific bacterial species in the presence of 100 mg Cr (VI)/l in PYE medium during two-day incubation at 30°C, were considered as Cr (VI) resistant. A single strain was capable of growing at this condition & was selected for further experiments.

Cr (VI) analysis

Chromate-reducing activity was estimated as the decrease in chromate concentration in supernatant with time using the Cr(VI)-specific colorimetric reagent 1,5-diphenylcarbazide (DPC), prepared in acetone/H2SO4 to minimize deterioration (Urone 1955) as follows: DPC (0.025 g) was dissolved in 9.67 ml acetone (AR) and 330 μl of 3 M H2SO4 was added. The reaction mixture was set up in an Eppendorf tube containing the following: 200 μl sample or standard sodium chromate solution, 400 μl 20 mM MOPS-NaOH buffer pH 7.0, 33 μl 3 M H2SO4, 40 μl 0.25% (w/v) DPC, and 327 μl distilled water. Spectrophotometric measurements were made immediately at 540 nm.

Identification of selected strains

Gram staining of bacterial strain was carried out using established methods (Collins and Patricia 1984). For PCR amplification, a small amount of a bacterial colony was resuspended in 100 μl of sterile deionised water (SDW), mixed and lysed at 70°C (10 min). Crude lysate (0.2 μl) was added to 19.8 μl SDW and used as a PCR template. Universal bacterial 16S rDNA gene primers pA (5′- AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and pH′ (5′-AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA- 3′) were used to amplify the ~1.5 kb 16S rDNA gene fragment (Edwards et al. 1989). Sequence data was aligned and analyzed for finding the closest homology for the microbe.

Preliminary screening for Cr (VI)-reducing activity

Strain was grown aerobically in PYE at 30°C overnight. For anaerobic Cr(VI) reduction tests, 45 ml of PYE in 50 ml serum bottles was degassed with O2-free N2 (10–20 min). Each bottle was inoculated using a syringe with 10% (v/v) of the starter culture and incubated statically at 30°C. Potassium dichromate (100 μM) was added after 2 h. Samples (1 ml) were withdrawn periodically and the bacterial density was determined as OD600 prior to harvest by centrifugation at room temperature. The cell pellet was suspended in 1 ml of isotonic saline [0.85% (w/v) NaCl] for protein assay and the supernatant was assayed for residual Cr (VI).

Effect of initial Cr (VI) concentration and initial cell density on Cr (VI) reduction by strain APD15

Strain APD15 (deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Genbank; accession no. EU781952) was precultured aerobically as described above. For aerobic Cr (VI) reduction tests, 45 ml of PYE in 250 ml flasks was inoculated with 10% (v/v) of the primary inoculum and incubated with shaking at 30°C with parallel anaerobic tests as described above but with various concentrations of sodium chromate added immediately after incubation. Growth, and residual chromate in the sample supernatants, was determined as above. To determine the effect of initial cell density, cells were precultured aerobically (30°C, 24 h) in PYE (40 ml). Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C (15 min), and kept on ice until use (usually within 1 h). Anaerobic Cr(VI) reduction tests were performed as described above with initial cell densities of 2.7×106, 5.3×107, 1.4×108, 1.0×109, and 2.4×109 cells/ml. potassium dichromate was added to 100 μM and the cells were incubated at 30°C. Residual chromate in the sample supernatants was determined as described above.

Results and Discussion

Cr (VI)-reducing activity of isolates

The Cr (VI)-reducing activity of 4 isolates was investigated as shown in Table 1. Strains APD1, APD8, APD15, and APD39 were selected for further study, with a maxi-mum removal of 94% of the Cr (VI) (APD15). These bacteria were Gram-positive, non spore-forming rods. On PYE agar, colonies were 1–3 mm in diameter, circular, low convex with an entire margin, opaque, and moist.

Figure 1
Table 1: Loss of hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI)]

16S RNA identification of selected strains

Based on nucleotides homology and phylogenetic analysis the Microbe (Sample: APD15) was detected to be Brevibacterium casei (GenBank Accession Number: EU781952).The 16S rDNA nucleotide sequences from NCBI gen bank were compared with known sequences in the EMBL database using ClustalW2 to identify the most similar sequence.

Figure 2
Fig 1: phylogenetic tree of with similar sequence from NCBI genbank

Chromate reduction activity by Brevibacterium casei (APD15)

The inoculum of the bacterial strains cultured overnight was used for this experiment. Culture flasks (150 ml) with a final volume of 100ml supplemented with (10-50mg/L) of Cr (VI) were inoculated with 2ml of inoculums for 24 hour. The growth kinetics of bacteria is characterized as initial lag phase, second exponential phase, stationary phase and death phase. In this experiment it is observed that lag phase is increasing with increased initial Cr (VI) concentration [Fig 2 & 3]. It is basically due to inhibitory effect of higher chromium concentration on the growth of the organism. Each organism has a specific resistance at a specified growth condition. As the initial age of the inoculum was fixed at 24 hours the acclimatization period at varying chromium concentration will not remain same. Hence the following behavior is observed. The chromium-resistant bacteria isolate exhibited reduced bioaccumulation when cells were in stationary phase. At higher concentrations the growth of the bacteria is inhibited due to fixed amount of inoculum for all the different concentration of Cr (VI) considered in the experiment.

Figure 3
Fig-2: Cr (VI) degradation kinetics varying chromium concentration

Figure 4
Fig-3: Biomass growth at varying chromium concentration

Conclusion

Bacterial chromate reduction has been reported under aerobic (Ishibashi et al. 1990; Cooke et al. 1995; Wang and Xiao 1995), anaerobic (Romanenko and Koren‘kov 1977; Lebedeva and Lyalikova 1979), or both (Llovera et al. 1993; Shen and Wang 1993) conditions. In this study, a newly isolated Cr (VI)- reducing bacterium was identified as a Brevibacterium sp. This bacterium reduced Cr (VI) anaerobically at the expense of Peptone & Yeast extract as the source for growth. Wang and Xiao (1995) studied the effect of Cr(VI) concentration (100–500 μM) on the aerobic reduction of Cr(VI) by Bacillus sp. and P. fluorescens LB300 at an initial cell concentration of 1010 cells/ml, reporting that complete Cr(VI) reduction by Bacillus sp. was not observed for concentrations higher than 100 μM in 96 h. With P. fluorescens LB300, complete Cr (VI) reduction did not occur even at the lowest Cr (VI) concentration during the same period. However, many researchers have suggested that bacterial chromate reduction and resistance are independent processes (Ohtake et al. 1987; Bopp and Ehrlich 1988), hence selection for chromate resistance is not usually considered as an appropriate strategy to select for Cr (VI)-reducing strains. However, Brevibacterium sp. APD15 is unusual because it is resistant to Cr (VI) during growth while being able to reduce Cr (VI).These experiments concluded that the cells have a elevated ability to reduce Cr (VI) coupled with resistance of the Putative metal reductase to toxic chromate and the Cr (III) product. These findings are potentially useful because this bacterium could be harnessed to the detoxification of chromate-contaminated industrial & mining waste by growth in the waste solution aerobically followed by an anaerobic reductive step, with the potential for biomass regeneration in a second aerobic cycle. This potential, and the resistance mechanism, are the subject of ongoing studies.

References

r-0. Bopp LH, Ehrlich HL (1988) Chromate resistance and reduction in Pseudomonas fluorescens strain LB300 Arch Microbiol 155:4426–4431.(S)
r-1. Cappuccino, J. G. and Sherman, N. (1996) Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual, 4th ed., Addison Wesley Publications, Boston. . (S)
r-2. Collins CH, Patricia ML (1984) Microbial methods. Butterworth, London, pp 93–106
r-3. Cooke VM, Hughes MN, Poole RK (1995) Reduction of chromate by bacteria isolated from the cooling water of an electricity generating station. J Ind Microbiol 14:323–328. (S)
r-4. Das, A., Mishra,S., (2008) Hexavalent Chromium (VI): Health hazards & Environmental Pollutant. Journal of Environmental Research and Development, Volume 2 No. 3. (S)
r-5. Edwards U, Rogall T, Blocker H, Emde M, Bottger EC (1989) Isolation and direct nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterisation of a gene encoding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 17:7843–785. (S)
r-6. Fendorf, S. E. (1995). Surface reactions of chromium in soils and waters. Geoderma, 67: 71.(S)
r-7. Fuji, E., Toda, K. & Ohtake, H. (1990) Bacterial reduction of toxic hexavalent chromium using a fed batch culture. Journal of Fermentation Bioengineering 69: 365-367. (S)
r-8. Ishibashi Y, Cervantes C, Silver S (1990) Chromium reduction in Pseudomonas putida. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:2268–2270.(S)
r-9. Lebedeva EV, Lyalikova NN (1979) Reduction of crocoite by Pseudomonas chromatophila sp.nov. Mikrobiologiya 48:517– 522.(S)
r-10. Lovley, D. R., and Phillips, E. J. P. (1994) Reduction of chromate by Desulfovibrio vulgaris and its c3 cytochrome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60(2): 726–728.(S)
r-11. Llovera S, Bonet R, Simon-Pujol MD, Congregado F (1993) Effects of culture medium ions on chromate reduction by resting cells of Agrobacterium radiobacter. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 39:424–426. (S)
r-12. Middleton, S. S. et al. (2003) Cometabolism of Cr (VI) by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 produces cell-associated reduced chromium and inhibits growth. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 83(6): 627–637.(S)
r-13. Ohtake H, Fujii E, Toda K (1990) Reduction of toxic chromate in an industrial effluent by use of a chromate-reducing strain Enterobacter cloacae. Environ Technol 11:663–668. (S)
r-14. Romanenko VI, Koren'kov VN (1977) A pure culture of bacteria utilizing chromates and bichromates as hydrogen acceptors in growth under anaerobic conditions. Microbiologiya 6:414– 417. (S)
r-15. Shen, H., Pritchard, P. H., and Sewell, G. W. (1996) Microbial reduction of Cr (VI) during anaerobic degradation of benzoate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30(5): 1667–1674. (S)
r-16. Shen H, Wang Y (1993) Characterization of enzymatic reduction of hexavalent chromium by Escherichia coli ATCC 33456. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3771–3777. (S)
r-17. Urone PF (1955) Stability of colorimetric reagent for chromium, S-diphenylcarbazide in various solvents. Anal Chem 27:1354–1355. (S)
r-18. Wang, Y-T., and Xiao, C. (1995) Factors affecting hexavalent chromium reduction in pure cultures of bacteria. Water Res. 29(110): 2467–2474. (S)
r-19. Yamamoto, K., Kato, J., Yano, T., and Ohtake, H. (1993) Kinetics and modeling of hexavalent chromium reduction in Enterobacter cloacae, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 41(1): 129–133.(S)

Author Information

Alok Prasad Das, M.Tech
Research Scholar, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela

Susmita Mishra
Assistant Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela

Download PDF

Your free access to ISPUB is funded by the following advertisements:

 

BACK TO TOP
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

© 2013 Internet Scientific Publications, LLC. All rights reserved.    UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy