Production and characterization of thermostable α-amylase from a newly isolated strain of Bacillus subtilis KIBGE-HAR
A Riaz, S Qadar, A Anwar, S Iqbal, S Bano
Keywords
alpha amylase, fermentation, medium, optimization, thermostable
Citation
A Riaz, S Qadar, A Anwar, S Iqbal, S Bano. Production and characterization of thermostable α-amylase from a newly isolated strain of Bacillus subtilis KIBGE-HAR. The Internet Journal of Microbiology. 2008 Volume 6 Number 1.
Abstract
Investigation on the fermentation conditions for Alpha-amylase (1,4-α-D-glucan glucanohydrolase, E.C. 3.2.1.1) production was carried out with
Introduction
The α-amylase (E.C. 3.2.1.1) randomly hydrolyzes alpha 1,4 glucosidic linkages in starch, glycogen and related polysaccharides yielding dextrins, oligosaccharides, maltose and D-glucose (Takeshita et al., 1975). Bacterial α-amylases are extensively important in industrial processes such as production of ethanol and high fructose corn syrup, baking, in laundry washing powders and dish washing detergents, textile desizing, and paper recycling (Nigam and Singh, 1995).
Thermostable enzymes are more versatile rather than thermolabile (Fogarth et al., 1974) as they have higher operational stability and a longer shelf life at elevated temperatures (Niehaus et al., 1999). Therefore the thermophilic microorganisms are of special interest for producing thermostable α- amylase, which can be use in a wide array of industrial processes (Chandra et al., 1980; McMohan et al., 1997). Bacteria belonging to the genus
Due to the increasing demand for thermostable α-amylase in various industries, it has been produced and characterized from different sources. The characteristics of α-amylase, such as its thermostability and pH profile should match its application.
In this regard it is essential to work on the conditions that lead to the bulk production of thermostable amylase for industrial applications and to search for α-amylase with improved properties. Therefore, the present study was carried out to optimize the fermentation conditions for the production of α-amylase from
Materials And Methods
Organism
The strain was isolated from air and pure culture study was performed. A pure culture of Bacillus subtilis
Media Composition
For α-amylase production, a culture medium was prepared containing (g/l): 15.0 soluble starch, 1.0 Yeast extract, 5.0 Bacto Peptone, 0.5 MgSO4, 0.5 NaCl and 0.002 CaCl2. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 7.0 before sterilization (Aliya et al. 2007).
Production of α -Amylase
Starch broth (45 ml) was inoculated with 5 ml of an overnight culture of B. subtilis
Enzyme Assay and Protein Determination
The saccharolytic activity of α-amylase in the culture filtrate was assayed by incubating 0.1 ml CFF with 1 ml soluble starch (2 % w/v, prepared in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer of pH 7.0) at 60±C for 5 minutes. The α-amylase level was determined by measuring the reducing sugar released from soluble starch (Nelson, 1944; Somogyi, 1945; Somogyi, 1952).
“An enzyme unit is defined as the amount of α-amylase that liberates 1 µmol of reducing sugar from the substrate in one minute at 60±C”.
Total Protein was measured by the Lowry et al. method (1951). Bovine serum albumin (250 µg/ml) was used as a standard.
Parametric Analysis for α-amylase production
The
The carbon source used was starch and different concentrations of starch (5 – 30 g/l) were tested to get the best one for α-amylase production.
The effects of temperature and pH of the medium were also studied. This was carried out by growing the organism at different temperatures (37 °C – 60 °C) and different pH values (5 – 10).
Various concentrations of nitrogen source i.e. peptone (0 – 20 g/l) were analyzed for the maximum production of α-amylase.
The effects of different levels of Yeast extract (0 – 5 g/l) and CaCl2 (0.001 – 0.01 g/l) were also investigated.
Comparison of different media compositions for α-amylase production from Bacillus subtilis KIBGE-HAR
Four different fermentation media were used for α-amylase production from
(Initial pH values of the media were adjusted to 7.0 before sterilization)
Characterization of α-amylase
Effect of substrate concentration on enzyme activity was measured at different concentrations of starch in the reaction mixture (0.25% - 2.5 %)
The temperature optimum was evaluated by performing the enzyme assay at different temperatures ranging from 35 °C to 75 °C.
Effect of pH on the activity of α-amylase was determined by measuring the activity at different pH values ranging from pH 5.5 to 9.0.
For the selection of appropriate buffer to get maximum enzyme activity, different buffer systems (50 mM each) including Citrate-Phosphate buffer, Phosphate buffer and Tris-HCl buffer of pH 7.00 were used.
Results
Time Course of Cellular Growth and α-amylase Production
A linear relationship was found between enzyme synthesis and cell growth i.e. maximum α-amylase production occurred when the cell mass reached to maximum (Fig. 1)
Effect of Starch Concentration on α-amylase Production and extracellular activity
Figure-2 showed that medium containing 1.5 g% starch supported the maximum production of α-amylase and increasing starch concentration beyond 1.5 g% resulted in the declined enzyme production.
Figure-3 showed the graphical analysis of the effect of substrate concentration on extracellular α-amylase activity. The maximum velocity was achieved with 2 % starch, where after it declined sharply.
Effect of Temperature on α-amylase production and extracellular activity
It was found that enzyme production in the fermentation medium increased with increase in temperature and maximum enzyme production was obtained at 50°C and after, enzyme production was sharply decreased at 55°C. At 50°C the maximum bacterial cells multiplication occurred and during their multiplication they secreted extracellular enzyme (Fig. 4).
The optimum temperature for maximum extracellular α-amylase activity was found to be 60°C.
Further increase in temperature resulted in reduce enzyme activity (Fig. 5).
Effect of pH on α-amylase production and extra cellular activity
Maximum enzyme production was observed when pH of the medium was kept 7.0 before sterilization (Fig. 6), while at pH 5 and pH 9, 68 % and 30 % production was observed respectively, with reference to the optimum pH.
The effect of pH on α-amylase activity is shown in Fig-7. Enzyme showed maximum extracellular α-amylase activity at neutral pH and as the pH increases the enzyme lost its activity.
Selection of buffer for α-amylase activity
Among different buffers tested, Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM) provided the most suitable buffering environment in which α-amylase activity was maximum (Fig. 8).
Effect of Peptone Concentration on α-amylase Production
The effect of peptone on α-amylase production by
Effect of Yeast Concentration on α-amylase Production
It was observed that medium containing 0.1 g% yeast extract supported optimal α-amylase production (Fig. 10) followed by a decline at high concentrations.
Effect of Ca+2 on α -amylase Production
Figure 11 showed that when 0.2 mg/dl CaCl2 was added in the fermentation medium, resulted in the enhancement of α- amylase production.
Comparison of different media for α-amylase production from KIBGE-HAR
It has been observed that the strain of
Discussion
Cellular growth of
Different carbon sources affect differently on the production of α-amylase (Welker and Campbell, 1963) and the most commonly used carbon source is starch (Bajpai and Bajpai, 1989). Starch at concentration of 15 g/l supported maximum production of enzyme followed by a decline at high concentrations. This may be the effect of catabolic repression i.e. glucose which was formed during the hydrolysis of starch may influenced negatively on α-amylase gene expression. These results are similar to the findings of Haseltine et al. (1996) who observed that glucose repressed the production of amylase by the hyperthermophilic
Starch was also used as a substrate for α-amylase activity. Optimum activity was achieved at 2 % starch, and as the substrate concentration increased, α-amylase activity dropped sharply which may be due to the substrate inhibitory effect.
Fermentation temperature has a profound effect on the level of enzyme produced in the medium. In the present study, α-amylase production by
Temperature is also the most important factor which markedly influences the enzyme activity. In the present study, optimum temperature for α-amylase activity was 60 °C. Further increase resulted in reduced enzyme activity as high temperatures induce conformational changes in three dimensional structure of an enzyme and its accommodation to substrate molecules becomes lower.
Medium pH also affects α-amylase production. Composition of cell wall and plasma membrane of microorganisms is known to be affected by the medium pH (Ellwood and Tempest, 1972). Due to this change in the nature of cell wall and plasma membrane the growth parameters may vary, especially temperature, and the provided temperature may not remain suitable for the growth of organism (Stutzenberger and Jenkins, 1995). This may be the reason of decreased production of α-amylase at pH 5 and 9 in the present study.
Optimum pH for α-amylase activity was found to be 7.0. The enzyme activity at pH 6.0 and 7.5 were 65 % and 77 % of that at pH 7.0, respectively. At pH 8.0, enzyme activity reduced to 46 %. Thus, we can conclude that α-amylase from
The nature and concentration of nitrogen source are important for the formation of α-amylase. Lower level of nitrogen is inadequate for the enzyme production and excess nitrogen is equally detrimental causing enzyme inhibition (Dharani Aiyer P. V., 2004).
As a nitrogen source peptone was added for α-amylase production. Similar finding was also reported previously (Davies et al, 1980).
The concentration of yeast extract was found to be crucial for the production of α-amylase and as the concentration increased after reaching maxima in medium a sharp fall of enzyme production was observed. The reason may be that the high concentration of yeast decreased the pH of the medium during fermentation which ultimately destroys the enzyme produced in the medium (Babu and Satyanarayana, 1993). Another reason could be that both yeast extract and peptone affect the surface charge, hydrophobicity and nitrogen-to-carbon ratio of the bacterial cell wall (Schar-Zammaretti Prisca et al., 2005) and the hydrophobicity of the cell wall decreases as the concentration of yeast extract and peptone increase in the medium. This decreased hydrophobicity of bacterial cell wall may result in decreased extracellular release of enzyme.
Calcium ions are known to be the stabilizer and activator of α-amylase and it has been reported that requirement of Ca+2 is different for thermostable α-amylase as compared to thermolabile. In case of thermolabile α-amylase, Mamo and Gassesse (1999) reported that 0.1 g/l CaCl2 was optimum for amylase production by
Different media have been compared with that of our own optimized medium i.e. medium 4. Medium 2 reduced markedly the enzyme production which may be due to the greater amount of yeast extract present and the strain did not utilized this extra yeast extract in the fermentation medium and due to this high concentration of yeast extract inhibition started (Babu and Satyanarayana, 1993). Medium 1 contained tryptone as a nitrogen supplement and showed lower enzyme production as compare to medium 3 and 4 which did not contain tryptone but peptone. It has been reported that maximum enzyme production was found with peptone as the nitrogen source (Lin et al., 1998, Dharani Aiyer, 2004) and tryptone resulted in decreased enzyme production. This may be the reason why medium 1 did not produced α-amylase optimally.
Media 1 and 2 which showed reduced enzyme production as compare to media 3 and 4 and did not contain CaCl2. It was previously reported that Ca+2 is known to be the stabilizer and activator of α-amylase (Kennedy et al., 1979; Hewitt et al, 1996), therefore the absence of CaCl2 in media 1 and 2 might be responsible for low enzyme production.
Conclusion
In the present study, we developed the new medium composition for the maximum production of α-amylase from
Acknowledgment
Authors acknowledge the help provided by Dr. Tanzeel Haider Usmani in this study.
Correspondence to
Dr. SHAH ALI UL QADER Institute of Sustainable Halophytes Utilization University of Karachi, Karachi-75270 Pakistan Ph # : 92-03212160109 Fax # : 92-021-2229310 E.mail: madar_chem@yahoo.com