ISPUB.com / IJMB/14/1/42638
  • Author/Editor Login
  • Registration
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

ISPUB.com

Internet
Scientific
Publications

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Latest Articles
  • Disclaimers
  • Article Submissions
  • Contact
  • Help
  • The Internet Journal of Microbiology
  • Volume 14
  • Number 1

Original Article

Molecular Characterization Of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Clinical Isolates Among Patients Of The Hospital Del Niño, Republic Of Panama

M Hernández, G Castillo, C Ciniglio, C Ramos, O Chen, B de Mayorga, O Durán, E González, M González, C Aguilar, O Cisterna, M de Chial

Citation

M Hernández, G Castillo, C Ciniglio, C Ramos, O Chen, B de Mayorga, O Durán, E González, M González, C Aguilar, O Cisterna, M de Chial. Molecular Characterization Of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Clinical Isolates Among Patients Of The Hospital Del Niño, Republic Of Panama. The Internet Journal of Microbiology. 2016 Volume 14 Number 1.

DOI: 10.5580/IJMB.42638

Abstract

The molecular characterization of 37 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa obtained during September 2013 and September 2014 was conducted based on the 16S rDNA and oprL genes. The genetic diversity among isolates was determined with ERIC-pcr. The segments of the opr L and 16s rDNA genes were used to detect all P. aeruginosa isolates. The ERIC-PCR bands generated patterns that allowed the separation of isolates into different groups or clades and classify them into different genotypes.

The susceptibility pattern of the isolated strains against ceftazidime, imipenem, gentamicin and amikin was assessed by a disk diffusion method. The percentage of isolates resistant to ceftazidime, imipenem, gentamicin and amikin was 14%, 16%, 16% and 24% respectively. In general these percentages are relatively low compared to those reported in other countries and only one of the isolates (64113) showed multidrug resistance.

 

Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous gram-negative rod shaped bacterium with a polar flagellum. Among fluorescent pseudomonads belonging to the rRNA group I of the gamma subclass of Proteobacteria, it is the only recognized human pathogen (De Vos et al., 2001, Palleroni, 2008).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a nosocomial human pathogen in immuno-compromised patients, such as those with cystic fibrosis, cancer, burns, and those hospitalized in intensive care units. Infections caused by Pseudomonas species include endocarditis, pneumonia, and infections of the urinary tract, central nervous system, wounds, eyes, ears, skin, and musculoskeletal system. (Pirnay et al., 2000, 2002, Campana et al., 2004).  

The use of catheters, medical devices, and chemical disinfectants represent an optimal means for acquiring nosocomial infections and therefore efforts to control the spread of the infections are difficult. In addition the emergence of multidrug resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa may lead to severe infections and life-long treatments.  These infections are untreatable because of the higher resistance to antimicrobial agents and lack of new drug development (Aendekerk et al., 2005, Stheling et al., 2010, Luna de Araujo, de et al., 2012, Nikbin et al., 2012, Kan et al., 2014).

The virulence factors of P. aeruginosa such as exotin A, exoenzyme S, pyoverdine, elastase and sialicidase among others are strongly regulated by cell to cell signaling systems that contribute to its pathogenecity (Cornelis et al., 1989, Van Delden & Iglewski, 1998, Khalifa et al., 2011).  The outer membrane proteins of P. aeruginosa play an important role in the bacteria-environment interactions and therefore to the pathogenic infections. The inherent resistance of P. aeruginosa to antibiotics is a consequence of the presence of specific proteins in the outer membrane, efflux pumps that affect cellular permeability. The outer membrane lipoproteins OprL and OprI have been implicated in these efflux transport systems (De Vos et al., 1997, Matthijs, Khattab, et al., 2015). 

P. aeruginosa identification has been based on phenotypic observations like the growth on selective media such as cetrimide agar, bacto casamino acids, and serotyping and anti-microbial-testing. However other gram-negative bacilli including other Pseudomonas species may interfere with the phenotypic typing of P. aeruginosa and this represents a drawback for the treatment of patients, particularly with regard to antimicrobial therapy and control of infection in hospitals. The genotyping methods solve the variable phenotype problem and are specific for the identification of P. aeruginosa. Since OprL and OprI proteins are found only in this organism they could be a reliable factor for rapid identification of P. aeruginosa in clinical samples. The 16S rDNA gene and the enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequences (ERIC) have been successfully used in epidemiological studies of several microorganisms, including P. aeruginosa (Stehling et al., 2010).

In this study 37 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from patients of the Hospital del Niño, Republic of Panama were characterized phenotypically with selective media and their susceptibility to antibiotics. The oprL and 16s rDNA molecular markers were used for rapid identification of the isolates and the ERIC-PCR was used to determine the genetic diversity between the isolates.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Isolates and Culture methods

 A total of 37 strains of P. aeruginosa were isolated from various sites of infections (blood, tracheal secretions, wound, eye and ear discharge and ulcer) of patients from the Hospital del Niño, República de Panamá and provided to the microbiology laboratory, between September  2013 and September 2014. First the isolates were grown on selective media such as cetrimide agar (AC) (Scharlau Chemie S.A., España) and bacto casaminoacids (CAA) (Becton, Dickinson Company, Estados Unidos) and incubated for 24 h at 37°C to verify pigment (pyoverdine) production as previously described (De Vos et al.,2001). Samples of all strains were store in 50% glycerol at -80°C.

Antimicrobial susceptibility

The antimicrobial susceptibility was performed using Kirby-Bauer’s disc-diffusion method as per CLSI (Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute) guidelines for antimicrobial susceptibility. The antibiotics used were ceftazidime (30 μg) (CAZ), amikin (30 μg) (AK), imipenem (10 μg) (IPM) and gentamicin (10 μg). P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as a control strain for this study.

DNA Extraction

Isolates were grown in CAA liquid medium at 37°C overnight and the DNA was extracted according to methods for gram-negative bacteria previously described (Chen and Kuo, 1993)

PCR amplification of the oprL and 16S rDNA genes

The amplification of these genes was carried out in a final volume of 25 μL following a method previously described. (De Vos, et al., 1997, Nikbin et al., 2012, Spilker, et al., 2004). 

ERIC PCR

ERIC-PCR typing was carried out using the primers ERIC1 (5’ ATG TAA GCTCCTGGGGATTCAC-3’) and ERIC2 (5’ AAGTAAGTGACTGGGGTGAGCG3’) in a final volume of 50 μL as previously described (Tosin et al., 2003). The amplification products (10 μL) were separated in a 0.8% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide for 3 h at 80V. The genomic fingerprints obtained were compared for similarity by visual inspection of band patterns. These patterns were converted to a two-dimensional binary matrix (1 = presence of band; 0 = absence of band)

The genetic distance between isolates was calculated using Nei’s genetic standard distance (Nei, 1987) and the allele distance DAS (Chakraborty y Jin, 1993) using the software Populations 1.2.30 beta (Languella, 2005). The cluster analysis of the Isolates was carried out using the software MEGA 6.06 and the UPGMA method (Unweighted Pair Group Method using Arithmetic averages); 1000 bootstrap samplings were used to obtain a confidence tree.

Results

Microbial and antibiotic susceptibility analysis

 The 37 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were grown on AC agar and CAA agar. Only 3 strains did not produce pyoverdine in CAA agar (Table 1).  The antibiotic sensitivity and resistance pattern were as studied in these isolates (Table 2). The highest rate of resistance was amikin (24%) and the lowest rate of resistance the antibiotic ceftazidime   (14%). The pattern of susceptibility was 76% to ceftazidime, 78% to imipenem, 73% to gentymicin and 68% to amikin. Three strains showed an intermediate susceptibility to ceftazidime that represents an 8%. In few isolates the susceptibility pattern was not determined, it represents 2% in ceftazidime, 5% in imipenem, 11 % in gentamycin and 8% in amikin. The strain 20 (641113) showed a multidrug resistance profile to all antibiotics (Table 3).

Molecular Analysis

The rapid identification of P. aeruginosa was performed with fragment amplification of the oprL and 16S rDNA genes. Two PCR products of 504 and 618 bp for the oprL y 16S rDNA respectively were obtained (figure 1, 2).

The ERIC-PCR fingerprints showed a banding pattern with sizes that ranged from approximately 3000 to 1500bp and an average of 6 amplicons (figure 3). By the UPGMA analysis based on the Nei genetic distance and the DAS allele distance, there were 3 major clusters, 2 of which are the negative control strains. The UPGMA based on Nei genetic distance is shown (figure 4). Among the isolates the positive control is included and the dendogram showed identical clusters that include strains 4 and11, strains 23 and 24; strains 3 and 7; and strains 12, 26, 30  are genetically identical (figure 4).

Discussion

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a nosocomial pathogen responsible for the high morbidity and mortality of immunocompromised patients. The infections caused by this bacterium are detected by standard methods such as growth on specific culture medias. This has been one of the most important techniques for diagnosis in microbiology due to easy quantification and the possibility of obtaining a pure sample for further studies, however other additional phenotypic test are always needed to obtain the exact identification.  Biochemical tests have facilitated the identification of P. aeruginosa but are time consuming. The API 20E test for identification of P. aeruginosa is not so useful as it does not clearly distinguish between related species and can only be applied at genus level (Ferguson et al., 2007, Hassan et al., 2012 Workentine et al., 2013).

In this study all P. aeuruginosa strains were isolated and identified at the Microbiology Laboratory of the Hospital del Niño. All isolates showed the characteristic odor and pyoverdine production in the CA and CAA media (Hassan et. al., 2012, 2014). The CA is a differential media for the identification of P. aeruginosa, in which cetrimide acts as a detergent that inhibits the growth of most bacteria and improves the production of pyoverdine and piocianine pigments (Hameed et al., 2014). CAA is an iron-restricted media that is used for siderophore production (Meyer et al., 1996)

The resistant patterns of the 37 clinical isolates were determined.  In the present study out of the 37 isolates 14% showed resistance to ceftazidime, 16% to imipenem, 16% to gentymicin and 24% to amikin. The resistance pattern to ceftazidime is low compared to the 90% and 71% values reported for Brazil and Peru respectively (Goncalves et al., 2009; Luján et al., 2008) and similar to the values reported in Cuba and France (Pérez et al., 2006; Minchella et al., 2010). The resistance pattern to imipenem is considerably low compared to those reported in Mexico, Brazil, Venezuela, India and Nigeria (Luján-Roca, 2014). The resistance values reported for gentymicin and amikin are also low compared to those reported in Nigeria, Tunisia and Korea (Luján-Roca, 2014).

The susceptibility patterns of the 37 clinical isolates were determined as well. In this study out of the 37 isolates, 76% were sensitive to ceftazidime, 78% to imipenem, 73% to gentymicin and 68% to amikin. In a previous study the susceptibility values were different, 35% to ceftazidime and 36% to gentymicin; but were similar to imipenem and amikin with 73% and 66 % values respectively (Luján-Roca et al., 2008). In Clinical isolates obtained in Jamaica, the susceptibility values for ceftazidime, 80% and 78% Gentamycin are similar to the values for the same antibiotics in this study and the sensitive values were different to the values exhibited for the same antibiotics in this study, 90% and 100% for imipenem and amikin respectively (Brown e Izundu, 2004). Clinical isolates from Iran hospitals displayed lower susceptibility values, amikin in 28%, ceftazidime in 28%, gentymicin, 40% and imipenem en 38% than those found in this study (Golshani et al., 2012).

Resistance to antimicrobial agents may have low power of discrimination and is often associated with mobile genetic elements (transposons, plasmids). Antibiogram changes may also reflect spontaneous point mutations such as those that have been observed for fluoroquinolones. Some isolates that are epidemiologically linked and are genetically indistinguishable may show different antimicrobial susceptibilities due to the acquisition of new genetic material in time or loss of plasmids. Conversely, unrelated isolates may have indistinguishable resistance profiles, which may represent the acquisition of the same plasmid by multiple species (Tenover et al., 1997).

The 64113 isolate (20) can be considered as a multidrug resistant strain (MDR) for its resistance to 4 antibiotics used in this study. Several studies worldwide have reported the presence of multiresistant strains (Salma, 2010; Kerr and Snelling, 2009; Mauldin et al., 2010; Tumbarello et al, 2011).  It has been shown that resistance of P. aeruginosa to antimicrobial agents is due to synergy between MDR efflux pumps and the low permeability of the outer membrane (Tam et al., 2010). The resistance may also result from the production of metallo β -lactamases, which may be encoded on a plasmid or on the chromosome (Livermore, 2001, Aendekerk et al., 2005, Luna de Araujo, et al., 2012).

Methods of detection in selective media are prolonged, very unreliable and require a quick and accurate diagnosis for an effective treatment of infections caused by this bacterium, and to control the spread of it in the hospitals as well (Salman et al., 2013, Xu et al., 2004).

Molecular methods for the rapid detection of P. aeruginosa, have been developed, specially the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is highly sensitive and specific. The ERIC-PCR technique, the16S rDNA and oprL genes were used in this study. The 16S rDNA gene has been widely used in taxonomy to identify the phylogeny of species of bacteria (Woese, 1977, Whitman et al., 1998). Selective amplification of 16S rDNA by PCR gene has been used to differentiate species of Pseudomonas from clinical and environmental samples (Salman et al., 2013). In this study the 16S rDNA gene specific for the Pseudomonas genus was used for the 37 isolates obtaining a 618 bp amplification fragment in all of them as previously reported (Spilker, et al., 2004).  The oprL gene has been used for the identification of P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. The results of this study are consistent with previous studies since the expected 504-bp amplification fragment in all isolates was obtained (De Vos et al., 1997, Hassan et al., 2012, Khattab et al., 2015).

Studies have reported that the ERIC-PCR technique is among the most useful molecular methods to establish the variability among isolates of P. aeruginosa (Jena et al., 2015 in press). This technique detected the differences in the number and distribution of repetitive sequences in the isolates. The most prominent bands were repeated in all the isolates (350 bp, 450bp, 700 bp and greater than 1000 bp) and other studies report similar bands (Wolska and Szweda, 2008). The control strain P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 displayed a similar profile to the isolates while P. stutzeri and P. putida gave a completely different profile showing the utility of this technique to discriminate against P. aeruginosa. No correlation was observed between the profiles obtained by ERIC-PCR and resistance patterns. None of the isolates showed resistance to at least three of the four antibiotics used pooled in the same clade. These results may suggest that the resistance in these isolates responded more to genes located on extrachromosomal elements.

This study demonstrated the utility of the 16S rDNA, oprL genes and the ERIC-PCR technique for the easy and specific identification of P. aeruginosa, indicating that it can be used as a routine diagnosis in Panamanian hospitals.

Table 1
P. aeruginosa Isolates growth on CAA and AC media

Table 2
Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from the Hospital del Niño, Panamá between years 2013 and 2014

Table 3
Susceptibility pattern of P. aeruginosa isolate to different antibiotics (Number of strains)

Figure 1
PCR Amplification of 16S rDNA gene of P. aeruginosa isolates (lanes 2-11). Lane 1 is a 100 bp DNA ladder (Promega)

Figure 2
PCR Amplification of oprL 16S gene of P. aeruginosa isolates (lanes 2-10). ). Lane 1 is a 100 bp DNA ladder (Promega)

Figure 3
ERIC-PCR fingerprints of P. aeruginosa. Lane1: λ pst1, Lane 2: P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853; Lane 3-12: clinical isolates, Lane 13: 100bp DNA ladder; lanes 14-20: clinical isolates, Lane 21: P. stutzeri, lane 22: P. putida

Figure 4
UPGMA based on the Nei genetic standard distance of the P aeruginosa isolates.

References

1. Aendekerk, S., Stephen P. Diggle, Zhijun Song, Niels Høiby, Pierre Cornelis, Paul Williams and Miguel Cámara. 2005 The MexGHI-OpmD multidrug efflux pump controls growth, antibiotic susceptibility and virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa via 4-quinolone-dependent cell-to-cell communication. Microbiology 151: 1113-1125.
2. Brown PD, Izundu A. 2004. Antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Jamaica. Rev Panam Salud Publica; 16: 125-30.
3. Campana S, Taccetti G, Ravenni N, Masi I, Audino S, Sisi B, Repetto T, Doring G, de Martino M. J. 2004. Molecular epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia complex and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a cystic fibrosis center. CystFibros.;3(3):159-63
4. Chen, W. & T. Kuo. 1993. A Simple and Rapid Method for the Preparation of Gram Negative Bacterial Genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Research. 21(9): 2260.
5. Chial M de, Ghysels B, Beatson SA, Geoffroy V, Meyer JM, Pattery T, Baysse C, Chablain P, Parsons YN, Winstanley C, Cordwell SJ, Cornelis P. 2003. Identification of type II and type III pyoverdine receptors from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology. 149(Pt 4):821-31.
6. Chakravorty, R. & Jin, L. 1995. Estimation of genetic distance and coefficient of gene diversity from single-prove multilocus DNA fingerprinting data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11:120-127
7. Clinical and laboratory standard institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty- fourth informational supplements (M 100-S24). Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2014 [Jan].
8. Cornelis, P., Hohnadel, D. and Meyer, J.M. 1989. Evidence for different pyoverdine-mediated iron uptake systems among Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Infect. Immun. 57:3491-3497.
9. De Vos, D., Lim, A., Pirnay, J-P. Struelens, M., Vandenvelde, C., Duinslaeger, L., Vanderkelen, A., and Cornelis, P. 1997. Direct Detection and Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Clinical Samples Such as Skin Biopsy Specimens and Expectorations by Multiplex PCR Based on Two Outer Membrane Lipoprotein Genes, oprI and oprL. J. Clin Microbiology. Vol. 35, 1295-1299.
10. De Vos, D., de Chial, M., Cochez, C., Jansen, S., Tümmler, B., Meyer, J.M. and Cornelis, P. 2001. Study of pyoverdine type and production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients: prevalence of type II pyoverdine isolates and accumulation of pyoverdine-negative mutations. Arch. Microbiol. 175: 384-388
11. Ferguson D., Cahill O.J., Quilty B. 2007. "Phenotypic, molecular and antibiotic resistance profiling of nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from two Irish Hospitals." Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences 1:1.
12. Fleiszig SM, Wiener-kronish JP, Miyazaki H, Valias V, Mostov KE, Kanada D, et al. 1997. Pseudomonas aeruginosa- mediated cytotoxicity and invasion correlate with distinct genotypes at the loci encoding exoenzyme S. Infect Immun 65: 579-586
13. Golshani Z, Ahadi AM, Sharifzadeh A. 2012. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Patients Referring to Hospitals. Arch Hyg Sc;1(2):48-53.
14. Goncalves, D.C.P.S.; LimAa, A.B.M.; Leao, L.S.N.O.; Carmo Filho, J.R.; Pimenta, F.C.; Viera, J.D.G. 2009 Detecção de metalo-beta-lactamase em Pseudomonas aeruginosa isoladas de pacientes hospitalizados em Goiânia, Estado de Goiás. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop., v.42, n.4, p.411-414.
15. Hameed, A.M., Malla, S. and Kumar , S. 2014. Molecular characterization of Pseudomonas sp. isolated from milk samples by using RAPD-PCR. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2014, 4(4):78-84.
16. Hanfield, M., Lehoux, D.E., Sanschagrin, F., Mahan, M.J., Woods, D.E. and Levesque, R.C. 2000. In vivo-induced genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 68:2359-2362.
17. Hassan, K. I., Abdullah, S. R. and Hawrami, K. 2014. PCR Ribotyping for Determining the Diversity of Some Clinical Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Isolates. Journal of Al-Nahrain University Vol.17 (2), June, 2014, pp.159-164 Science
18. Hassan, K., Rafik, S.A., Mussum, K. 2012. Molecular identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from Hospitals in Kurdistan region. Journal of Advanced Medical Research Vol.2 No.3, September 2012, 90-98
19. Khalifa A, B.H., Moissenet D, Vu Thien H, Khedher M. 2011.Virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and modes of regulation. Ann Biol Clin (Paris).;69(4):393-403. doi: 10.1684/abc.2011.0589.
20. Khan F, Khan A, Kazmi SU. 2014. Prevalence and susceptibility pattern of multi drug resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Karachi. Pak. J Med Sci 2014;30(5):951-954. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.305 .5400
21. Khattab MA, Nour MS, ElSheshtawy NM. 2015. Genetic Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Virulence Genes among Different Isolates. J Microb Biochem Technol 7:274-277. doi:10.4172/1948-5948.1000224

22. Kerr KG, Snelling AM. 2009 Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a formidable and ever-present ad‐ versary. J Hosp Infect 73. 338–344.
23. Kumar S, Stecher G, Peterson D, and Tamura K. 2012. MEGA-CC: Computing Core of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Program for Automated and Iterative Data Analysis. Bioinformatics 28:2685-2686.
24. Jena J, et al. 2015. Phylogenetic study of metallo-b-lactamase producing multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from burn patients. Burns http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.06.004
25. Langella, O. 2005. Populations 1.2.30. Laboratoire Populations, Gènètique et Evolution, Centre Nacional de la Recherche Scientifique, CNRS UPR9034, Gif Sur Yvette. Paris, France.
26. Livermore DM. 2001. Of Pseudomonas, porins, pumps and carbapenems. J Antimicrob Chemother 47(3):247- 50.
27. Luján-Roca, D. Jimmy O. Ibarra-Trujillo, J. y Mamani-Huamán, E. 2008. Resistencia a los antibióticos en aislados clínicos de Pseudomonas aeruginosa en un hospital universitario en Lima, Perú. Rev Biomed Vol. 19:156-160
28. Luján Roca DÁ Pseudomonas aeruginosa: un adversario peligroso Acta Bioquím Clín Latinoam 2014; 48 (4): 465-74
29. Luna de Araújo Jácome,P.; Rodrigues Alves, L.; Borges Cabral, A.; Souza Lopes, AC & Maria Amélia Vieira Maciel, M. 2012. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance and virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from Recife, State of Pernambuco, Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. vol.45 no.6 Uberaba Nov./Dec. 2012.
30. Matthijs S., Coorevits A, Gebrekidan TT, Tricot C, Wauven CV, Pirnay JP, De Vos P, Cornelis P. 2013. Evaluation of oprI and oprL genes as molecular markers for the genus Pseudomonas and their use in studying the biodiversity of a small Belgian River. Res Microbiol. 2013 Apr;164(3):254-61. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2012.12.001. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
31. Mauldin PD, Salgado CD, Hansen IS, et al. 2010 Attributable hospital cost and length of stay associated with health care-associated infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Gram- negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54. 109–115.
32. Meyer, J.M., Neely, A., Stintzi, A., Georges, C. and Holder, I.A. 1996. Pyoverdine is essential for virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 64:518-523.
33. Meyer, J.M. 2000. Pyoverdines: pigments; siderophores and potential taxonomic markers of fluorescent Pseudomonas species. Arch. Microbiol. 174:135-142.
34. Meyer, J.M., Geoffroy, V.A., Baida, N., Gardan, L., Izard, D., Lemanceau, P., Achouak, W. and Palleroni, N. 2002. Siderophore typing, a powerful tool for the identification of fluorescent and nonfluorescent pseudomonads. App. Environ. Microbiol. 68:2745-2753.
35. Minchella A, Molinari L, Alonso S, Bouziges N, Sotto A, Lavigne JP. 2010.Évolution de la résistance aux antibio- tiques de Pseudomonas aeruginosa dans un centre 
 hospitalier universitaire entre 2002 et 2006. Pathol Biol (Paris) 58 (1): 1-6.

36. NCCLS 2002. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. 7th ed. Approved standard M02-A7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova. PA. USA.
37. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press. New York, USA. 512p.
38. Nikbin VS, Aslani MM, Sharafi Z, Hashemipour M, Shahcheraghi F & Ebrahimipour GH. 2012. Molecular identification and detection of virulence genes among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from different infectious origins. Iranian Jour. of Microbiol. Volume 4 Number 3: 118-123
39. Palleroni, N.J. (2008) The road to the taxonomy of Pseudomonas. In Pseudomonas: Genomics and Molecular Biology ed. Cornelis, P. pp. 1–18. Hethersett, UK: Caister Acad Press.
40. Peakall, R. and Smouse P.E. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537-2539. Freely available as an Open access article from here:http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/19/2537
41. Peakall, R. and Smouse P.E. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes. 6, 288-295.
42. Pfaller, Michael. 1999. Molecular epidemiology in the care of patients. Arch. Pathol Lab Med. 123:1007-1010.
43. Pirnay, J.P., De Vos Daniel, Cochez, C., Bilocq, F., Vanderkelen, A., Zizi, M., Ghysels, B. and Cornelis, P. 2002. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays an epidemic population structure. Environ. Microbiol. 4:898-911.
44. Pirnay, J.P., De Vos Daniel, Duinslaeger, L., Reper,P., Vandenvelde, C., Cornelis, P. and Vanderkelen, A. 2000. Quantitation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in wound biopsy samples : from bacterial culture to rapid ‘real-time’ polymerase chain reaction. Crit. Care. 4:255-261.
45. Salman M, Ali A, Haque A. 2013. A novel multiplex PCR for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A major cause of wound infections. Pak J Med Sci 29(4):957-961. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.294.3652
46. Sarwari A, Hasan R, Lim CB, Ng Y, Ng C, Zaman S. 2004. PCR identification and automated ribotyping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from intensive care patients. Scand J Infect Dis. 36(5):342-9.
47. Speert DP. 2002 . Molecular epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Biosci. 1(7):354-61.
48. Spilker,T., Coenye, T., Vandamme, P. and LiPuma, J. 2004. PCR-Based Assay for Differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Other Pseudomonas Species Recovered from Cystic Fibrosis Patients. J Clin Microbiol. 42(5): 2074–2079.
49. Stehling EG, Silveira WD, Leite DS. 2008. Study of Biological Characteristics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and from Patients with Extra-Pulmonary Infections. Braz J Infect Dis. 12:86-88.
50. Stehling, E., Leite, D., Silveira, W. 2010. Molecular typing and biological characteristics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients in Brazil. The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. Volume 14, Issue 5, September–October 2010, Pages 462–467
51. Tosin I, Silbert S, Sader HS. 2003. The use of molecular typing to evaluate the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance among Gram-negative rods in Brazilian hospitals. Braz J Infect Dis 7:360-9.
52. Tumbarello M, Repetto E, Trecarichi EM, et al. 2011. Multidrug- resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections: risk factors and mortality. Epidemiol Infect 139. 1740-1749.
53. Van Delden C, Iglewski BH. 1998. Cell-to-cell signaling and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Emerg Infect Dis 4: 551-560
54. Whitman W., Coleman D. and Wiebe, W.1998. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 6578- 6583.
55. Woese CR, Fox GE. 1977. "Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: The primary kingdoms". PNAS 74(11): 5088– 5090 doi:10.1073/pnas.74.11.5088.P MC 432104. PMID 270744.
56. Wolska, K. and Szweda, P. 2008. A Comparative Evaluation of PCR Ribotyping and ERIC PCR for Determining the Diversity of Clinical Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Isolates.Polish Journal of Microbiology.Vol. 57, No 2, 157–163
57. Workentine ML, Sibley CD, Glezerson B, Purighalla S, Norgaard-Gron JC, et al. (2013) Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Populations in a Cystic Fibrosis Patient. PLoS ONE 8(4): e60225. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060225
58. Xu, J.,Moore, J.E P., Murphy, G., Millar, B.C. and Elborn, J.S. 2004. Early detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa—comparison of conventional versus molecular (PCR) detection directly from adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 3 p. 21.

Author Information

Maximino Hernández
Universidad de Panamá, Facultad de Medicina, Maestría en Ciencias Biomédicas


Griselda Castillo
Universidad de Panamá, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Exactas y Tecnología, Depto de Microbiología y Parasitología

Carmelo Ciniglio
Universidad de Panamá, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Exactas y Tecnología, Depto. de Genética y Biología Molecular

Carlos Ramos
Universidad de Panamá, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Exactas y Tecnología, Depto. de Genética y Biología Molecular

Olga Chen
Universidad de Panamá, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Exactas y Tecnología, Depto. de Genética y Biología Molecular

Brenda de Mayorga
Universidad de Panamá, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Exactas y Tecnología, Depto de Microbiología y Parasitología

Ovidio Durán
Universidad de Panamá, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Exactas y Tecnología, Depto. de Genética y Biología Molecular

Edna González
Universidad de Panamá, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Exactas y Tecnología, Depto. de Genética y Biología Molecular

Maribel González
Universidad de Panamá, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Exactas y Tecnología, Depto. de Genética y Biología Molecular

Criseida Aguilar
Universidad de Panamá, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Exactas y Tecnología, Depto. de Genética y Biología Molecular

Osvaldo Cisterna
Ministerio de Salud, Hospital del Niño

Magaly de Chial
Universidad de Panamá, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Exactas y Tecnología, Depto. de Genética y Biología Molecular

Download PDF

Your free access to ISPUB is funded by the following advertisements:

 

BACK TO TOP
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

© 2013 Internet Scientific Publications, LLC. All rights reserved.    UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy