Genotoxicity of Ecballium elaterium (L) A Rich Cucurbitaceae Fruit Juice Using Micronucleus Assay and DNA Single Strand Break Techniques.
I Muhammad Said Shabbar, A Maslat
Citation
I Muhammad Said Shabbar, A Maslat. Genotoxicity of Ecballium elaterium (L) A Rich Cucurbitaceae Fruit Juice Using Micronucleus Assay and DNA Single Strand Break Techniques.. The Internet Journal of Health. 2006 Volume 6 Number 2.
Abstract
This study was designed to investigate the genotoxicity of the
Introduction
Medicinal plants play an important role in the life of people in many countries and its use increases more and more all over the world. Green plants are generally containing mutagenic and carcinogenic substances, but there is little information about the biological activities of herbal medicine.[1]
.
The ripe fruit is about 4 cm long of yellow-green color. The name ‘‘squirting cucumber'‘ comes from the tendency of the ripe fruit to explode upon the slightest touch, with its dark seeds and juice ejected at a distance of several meters. [10, 11] Herbal medicine recommends it for the treatment of chronic sinusitis or rhinosinusitis [7, 12] It is also recommended for liver cirrhosis as well as other conditions thought to be inflammatory in nature including rheumatism and infections [13] The juice of
The objectives of the study aimed at determining the LD50 and investigating the genotoxicity of
The elicit effect of the E. elaterium fruit juice on the DNA.
Materials And Methods
The protocol of the study was approved by research and animal testing ethics committee of Yarmouk University Deanship of Researches and Postgraduate studies,
Animal subjects
Balb/c male mice 2-3 months old weighing 25-30 g were used. The mice were placed in cages (6-8/each) and maintained under controlled conditions (temperature 20-22°C, relative humidity 60-80% and on 12 hrs light-dark cycle) and on diet
Plant materials
The ripe fruits of
Oral administration of the juice
This process needed two persons; one handled the mouse, taking it from the cage and semi- anesthize it with diethyl ether and holding it tight and vertical and the other one holding a forceps in one hand and the micropipette (containing the specific dose that should be given) in the other hand. The forceps was used to open the mouse mouth and smoothly pulling its tongue, then in the other hand the micropipette was inserted into the mouse oral cavity slightly into the beginning of the esophagus after the throat, then waiting for the mouse to begin waking up. At this point the dose was given, waiting for the mouse to swallow the dose while holding the tongue.
Determination of LD
Sixty four Balb/c male mice were divided into eight groups. Each group received orally 160, 113, 100, 87, 74, 61, 48, and 24 µl of the
Micronucleus assay
Cell preparation
Frozen fruits were quickly thawed at 37 °C in an air blowing incubator and then the juice were extracted and chilled on ice. A total number of 36 mice were used in the first and the second experiment, given a single dose via the gastric route using 74, 61 and 48 µl doses of the
A total of 12 mice were used as negative and positive controls in the first and the second experiment that were applied according to González Borroto
Preparation of the blood smears
Blood smears were prepared on clean pre-washed glass slides. The prepared blood films were air-dried and fixed in methanol for about 3 minutes (Schmid, 1975; Heddle
Staining and micronucleus evaluation
The smeared preparations were stained with Acridine orange (AO) according to the method of Stockert and Lisanti (1972) with some modifications according to Hayashi
From each animal, 2000 normochromatic erythrocytes were screened for micronuclei.
Single strand breaks
Thirty two Balb/c male mice were divided into eight groups; each group has four mice in it. Frozen fruits were quickly thawed at 37 °C in an air blowing incubator and then the juice was extracted and chilled on ice. The first three groups received a single dose via the gastric route of 61 µl of the
The other two groups, one was used as a negative control (without treatment) on normal diet, and the other group received a single dose of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) at a concentration of (150 mg/kg, ip) which was used as a positive control (Lee and Garner, 1991). Solveig Walles and Erixon (1984) stated that the relative level of SSB in DNA was determined in various organs (liver, kidney, lung, spleen, testis and brain) 1-24 hrs after administration of the agent. After MMS-treatment, the number of SSB in DNA increased to about the same extent in all organs 1 hr post-treatment but then decreased by time; the SSB persisted for the longest time in brain- and lung-DNA. The DNA alkylating agent MMS is used as a DNA damaging agent to induce mutagenesis and in recombination experiments. MMS modifies both guanine (to 7-methylguanine) and adenine (to 3-methyladenine) to cause base mispairing and replication blocks, respectively (Lundin
DNA extraction from the blood
Promega Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Cat. number A1120, lot number 198647) was used for the DNA purification. The blood samples were freshly collected in EDTA (4%) treated. Then the tubes were gently rocked until thoroughly mixed (about 10 times); 300 µl of the fresh blood samples were transferred to marked 1.5 ml tubes containing 900 µl Cell Lysis Solution (the tubes were inverted 5-6 times to mix). The mixture was incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature (the tubes were inverted 2-3 times once during the incubation to lyse the red blood cells). The tubes were centrifuged at 13,000-16,000 x g for 20 seconds at room temperature. Then the supernatant was removed and discarded as much as possible without disturbing the visible white pellet (approximately 10-20 µl of residual liquid remained in the 1.5 ml tubes that we have). After that, the tubes were vortexed vigorously until the white blood cells were resuspended (10-15 seconds) and 300 µl of Nuclei Lysis Solution were added to the tubes containing the resuspended cells and the solution was pipetted 5-6 times for each tube to lyse the white blood cells (the solution should become very viscous). 1.5 µl of RNase Solution was added to the nuclear lysate. The samples were mixed by inverting the tubes 2-5 times and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 15 minutes, and then cooled to room temperature (or chilled on ice for 5 min.). 100 µl Protein Precipitation Solution was added to the nuclear lysate and vortexed vigorously for 10-20 seconds. The samples were centrifuged at 13,000-16,000 x g for 3 minutes at room temperature (a dark brown protein pellet was visible). The supernatant for each sample was transferred separately to a clean marked 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes containing 300 µl of room temperature isopropanol (the solutions were gently mixed by inversion until the white thread-like strands of DNA form a visible mass). Then the samples were centrifuged at 13,000-16,000 x g for 1 minute at room temperature (the DNA was visible as a small white pellet). The supernatant was decanted and one sample volume of room temperature 70% ethanol was added to the DNA (to wash the DNA pellet and the sides of the microcentrifuge tube, the tube was gently inverted several times). Then the samples were centrifuged at 13,000-16,000 x g for 1 minute at room temperature. Ethanol was carefully aspirated, the tubes were inverted on clean absorbent paper and the pellet was air-dried for 10-15 minutes. Finally, 100 µl of DNA Rehydration Solution (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA) was added to each tube and the DNA was rehydrated by incubating the samples at 65°C for 1 hour and the DNA samples were stored at 2-8 °C.
Genomic DNA isolation from liver
Promega Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Cat. number A1120, lot number 198647) was used for the DNA purification. The liver was surgically removed from each mouse and instantly immersed in liquid nitrogen and grounded using an autoclaved ceramic pestle. About 17 mg of the grounded tissue was added to 600 µl of Nuclei Lysis Solution that was previously added to an ice chilled 1.5 ml marked centrifuge tubes. After all samples were collected, the samples were incubated at 65 °C for 15-30 min.; 3 µl of RNase Solution was add to the nuclear lysate and the samples were mixed by inverting the tubes 2-5 times. The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 15-30 minutes, and then cooled to room temperature (or chilled on ice for 5 min.). Then, 200 µl Protein Precipitation Solution was added to the nuclear lysate and vortexed vigorously for 20 seconds, chilled on ice for 5 min. and were centrifuged at 13,000-16,000 x g for 4 minutes at room temperature (a dark brown protein pellet was visible). The supernatants for each sample were transferred separately to a clean marked 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes containing 600 µl of room temperature isopropanol (the solutions were gently mixed by inversion until the white thread-like strands of DNA form a visible mass). The samples were centrifuged at 13,000-16,000 x g for 1 minute at room temperature (the DNA was visible as a small white pellet). The supernatant was decanted and 600 µl room temperature 70% ethanol was added to the DNA (to wash the DNA pellet and the sides of the microcentrifuge tube the tube was gently inverted several times). Then the samples were centrifuged at 13,000-16,000 x g for 1 minute at room temperature. Ethanol was carefully aspirated; then the tubes were inverted on clean absorbent paper and the pellet was air-dried for 10-15 minutes. Finally, 100 µl of DNA Rehydration Solution (Tris- EDTA) was added to each tube and the DNA was rehydrated by incubating the samples at 65°C for 1 hour and the DNA samples were stored at 2-8 °C.
Alkaline agarose gel electrophoresis
DNA single-strand breaks were assayed by using alkaline agarose gel electrophoresis as previously described by Freeman
In the
In the
Results
Determination of LD
The mice were separated into groups; each group consisted of 8 mice. Each mouse received a specific amount of the fruit juice that was freshly thawed and given to the mouse via the gastric route. Then, the animals were monitored for mortality after 24 hrs and percent mortality were calculated.
Figure 2
So, the LD50 was estimated to be 61 µl of the fruit juice according to table (1). Determination of LD50 was used as a guide for the determination of doses, which were used in the next experiments.
Micronucleus assay
The mice were separated into five groups in each experiment; three groups consist of 12 mice and two groups consist of three mice each. The mice in the first three groups received different amount of the fruit juice (74, 61 and 48 µl) that was freshly thawed and given to the mice via the gastric route; the second two groups, one was the negative control which remained without treatment and the second one was the positive control that received a single dose of MMC 14 mg/kg, dissolved in sterile distilled water. After 36 hrs of the dose administration via the gastric route, peripheral blood was harvested from each mouse in heparinized capillary tubes from the retro-orbital vein. After that, blood smears were made for each mouse in quadruplicate and some cases in pentuplicate, air-dried and fixed with methanol. Figures 3-5, present microphotographs of AO-stained peripheral blood films of mouse at different treatments.
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
To interpret the results, it should be emphasized that there are several criteria for determining a positive response. One of which is a statistically significant dose-related increase in the number of micronucleated normochromatic erythrocytes. Another criterion may be based upon detection of a reproducible and statistically significant positive response for at least one concentration of the test substance. A test substance which does not produce either a statistically significant dose-related increase in the number of micronucleated normochromatic erythrocytes or a statistically significant and reproducible positive response at any one of the test points is considered nonmutagenic in this system. Both biological and statistical significance should be considered together in the evaluation (EPA, 1996). Under the test conditions, the fruit juice succeeded in producing a dose-response increase in the number of micronucleated normochromatic erythrocytes and a significant response as seen in tables 3 through 6.
Looking at table (3), since ? ? 0.05, the results indicate that there are statistically significant differences in the means of MN formation due to different doses compared to the group without treatment. From the Post Hoc tests for multiple comparisons (Table 4), it is noticed that there are also statistically significant differences in the means of MN formation in the mice that received a 74, 61 and 48 µl of the juice compared to the negative control group.
Table (5) shows that ? ? 0.05 indicating that the results are statistically significant in respect to MN formation due to different doses compared to the group that was treated with MMC. From the Post Hoc tests for multiple comparisons in table (6), it is clear that there are also statistically significant differences in the means of MN formation in the mice that received a 74, 61 and 48 µl of the juice compared to the group that was treated with MMC. For the group that received a 74 µl of the fruit juice, it's observed that the mean difference is in negative that is because the MN formation in the group that was treated with the juice was more than that of the group treated with MMC and has a statistical significance. On the other hand, the group that was treated with 61 µl of the juice had a positive mean difference in table (6) which means that it's lower than the mean of the group treated with MMC, it has a biological significance but no statistical significance (because it's around the mean of the MMC treated group), it has a statistical significance difference in the mean of MN formation compared to the untreated group (the negative control). Concerning the group that received a 48 µl of the juice, it showed a statistically significant difference compared to the negative control.
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Single strand breaks
The mice were separated into eight groups; two of the first three groups received a single dose, via the gastric route, of 61 and 48 µl of the
We conducted a pilot experiment using an alkaline gel electrophoresis described by Lin
Figure 11
The electrophoretic analysis of DNA single-strand breaks was conducted using alkaline agarose gel electrophoresis as previously described by Freeman
In figure (8), after 1 hr of juice administration, the group that received a highest concentration of the juice produced a higher DNA fragmentation in the mice liver DNA in lane 1, whereas the lower concentration had a lower effect on the DNA fragmentation at this time in lane 2 & 3. This indicates a dose dependent induction of DNA fragmentation. After 24 hrs of exposure, the higher dose effect on the DNA fragmentation was lower than that of the first time period in lane 6, but the lower concentration of the fruit juice had a higher effect on the DNA fragmentation in lane 7-9. After 36 hrs, however, the effect of the higher dose of the juice on the DNA fragmentation remained low in lane 11 and the lower concentration of the juice produced slightly lower DNA fragmentation than at the second time period in lane 12.
In figure (9), the same results can be seen concerning the blood DNA. About
Figure 12
Figure 13
Discussion
This study represents the first attempt to investigate the genotoxic effects of
Overall, the collected data indicate that the fruit juice had a significant effect on the induction of MN formation in mice because there were statistically significant dose-related increases in the number of micronucleated normochromatic erythrocytes. Another criterion was based upon detection of a reproducible and statistically significant positive response for the test substance concentrations.
The electrophoretic analysis of DNA single-strand breaks was conducted using alkaline agarose gel electrophoresis as previously described by Freeman
For testing of the fruit juice ability to produce a DNA single-strand breaks in the mice DNA in the liver or in the blood
In the electrophoretic analysis of DNA single-strand breaks of mice liver DNA, a dose-dependent induction of DNA fragmentation was noted. The group that received a higher concentration of the juice exhibited a higher DNA fragmentation in the mice liver DNA, whereas the lower concentration had a lower effect on the DNA at this time. After 24 hrs of exposure, the higher dose effect on the DNA fragmentation was lower than that of the first time period but the lower concentration of the fruit juice had an increase in the DNA fragmentation. After 36 hrs, the effect of the higher dose of the juice on the DNA fragmentation remained low and the lower concentration of the juice produced slightly lower DNA fragmentation than at the second time period due to the same criteria that were discussed earlier on (figure 8).
In the electrophoretic analysis of DNA single-strand breaks of mice blood DNA, a dose-dependent induction of DNA fragmentation was also recorded. The group that received a higher concentration of the juice produce a higher DNA fragmentation in the mice blood DNA, whereas the lower concentration had a lower effect on the DNA fragmentation at this time. After 24 hrs of exposure, the higher dose effect on the DNA fragmentation was lower than that of the first time period but the lower concentration of the fruit juice had an increase in the DNA fragmentation. After 36 hrs, the effect of the higher dose of the juice on the DNA fragmentation remained low and the lower concentration of the juice produced slightly lower DNA fragmentation than at the second time period. This is due to the same criteria that were discussed earlier; an induction of DNA fragmentation was observed for the
Conclusions
The conclusion of the present study was made taking into consideration both
LD50 was estimated to be 61 µl of
At concentrations higher than LD50, it was observed that the mice blood was thicker than normal controls.
Acknowledgments Of The First Author
I Dedicate this work to the memory of my late father Muhammad Said Shabbar who inspired me to do such work and to My dear Mother for her care and support Lady Malak Al Moujtahed Shabbar
With the help of Almighty Allah this work has been finished and the caring and supervision of my supervisor Dr. Ahmed Maslat, thanks to him for his supervision, guidance and encouragement through out this work. Also my deep thanks and great appreciation goes to Prof. Dr. Ahmad Khalil for his help and encouragement, critical suggestions and invaluable comments. My thanks are extended to Prof. Dr. Mahmoud Abussaud and Dr. Saleem Abderrahman for their kindness being members of my committee and for their invaluable comments and suggestions.
I'm grateful to Dr. Ammar Omran from faculty of Pharmacy at Al-Zaytoona University for his help in the quantitative determination of triterpenes in the fruit juice. Thanks to Prof. Dr. Jamil N. Lahham for the classification of the investigated plant.
Correspondence to
Ibrahim Muhammad Said Shabbar B Sc Post graduate Student Yarmouk University Irbid Jordan e-mail: omega@go.com.jo