Coexisting Covert And Overt Menstruation
S Ghose, D Maurya, M Gowda, M Manikandan
Keywords
müllerian anomaly, renal agenesis, uterus didelphys
Citation
S Ghose, D Maurya, M Gowda, M Manikandan. Coexisting Covert And Overt Menstruation. The Internet Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2012 Volume 16 Number 2.
Abstract
A 16 year-old unmarried girl presented with intermenstrual discharge per vagina. Examination and investigation revealed uterus didelphys, hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis with haematocolpos. Patient was treated with drainage of the haematocolpos and excision of the vaginal septum.
Introduction
The reported incidence of Mullerian anomalies accounts for 0.5 – 5.0% in women 1. Uterine didelphys accounts for 11% of uterine malformations 2. Incidence of renal agenesis is 30% in Mullerian anomalies and more frequently with obstructed Mullerian anomalies 2. The specific association of uterus didelphys, obstructed hemivagina and an ipsilateral kidney was first described by Wilson in 1925 3. This association is also known as Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich Syndrome 4. Recently it has been termed OHVIRA (Obstructive Hemivagina with Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis).
Case Report
A 16 year-old, unmarried girl presented vaginal discharge after menstruation and cyclical lower abdominal pain for 2 months. There was a history of similar complaints 1 year back for which the patient consulted a local doctor and was diagnosed with pyometra. She attended menarche at 12 years-old and had regular menstrual cycles. She did not have significant past or family history. On examination patient had normal secondary sexual characteristics. Per vaginal examination revealed tender, tense & cystic bulge in the right anterolateral vaginal wall ~ 7 x 8 cm size. Our clinical diagnosis was vaginal wall cyst or a Hematoma. Transabdominal sonography revealed double uterus
The patient was posted for EUA
Discussion
Mullerian duct anomalies are congenital anatomic abnormalities that arise from non development or non fusion or failed resorption of Mullerian ducts. They are particularly important because they are associated with an increased risk of infertility, menstrual disorders, and obstetric complications. It is fundamental to have a basic knowledge of the embryology of the female genital tract to understand this group of congenital anomalies. The first stage of mullerian duct development begins at an approximately 6 weeks gestational age when the paired mullerian ducts invaginate and then grow caudally and cross over the Wolffian ducts to meet at the midline. The subsequent three phases (fusion, resorption, and vaginal induction) proceed in an orderly fashion from the 9th to the 22nd gestational week. Mullerian duct development occurs in close association with the development of the urinary system, and this explains the frequent association of anomalies of these two systems.
The Uterovaginal anomalies are classified by American Fertility Society in which class 1 is dysgenesis of Mullerian ducts, class 2 is disorders of vertical fusion of Mullerian ducts, class 3 is disorders of lateral fusion of Mullerian ducts which can be symmetric or asymmetric, and class 4 is unusual configurations of vertical-lateral fusion defects. Our case belongs to class 3 asymmetric variety
Uterus didelphys is most often recognized as a part of a syndrome associated with obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis. There is often delay in diagnosis when compared to complete obstruction (imperforate hymen, transverse vaginal septum) due to the fact that patients with obstructed hemivagina have periods 6. MRI is the most reliable non invasive modality for evaluating Mullerian anomalies7. It provides accurate preoperative evaluation and also useful in detecting coexisting urinary anomalies like renal agenesis, hypoplasia, dysplasia, ectopic ureters. Thus early and accurate diagnosis of this syndrome is important so that adequate and prompt surgical (excision of the septum) can provide adequate relief and prevent complications like endometriosis. Successful obstetric outcome with this syndrome is 60%.
Acknowledgement
We are thankful to the department of radiology for providing us the necessary help in reaching the accurate diagnosis.