A Prospective Study of School Preparedness for Medical and Traumatic Emergencies
I Barata, I Llovera, D Riccardi, R Mayerhoff, J Childress, E Livote, A Litroff, M Ward, A Sama
Keywords
automatic external defibrillator, equipment, medical emergencies, resources, school nurses, school preparedness, traumatic emergencies
Citation
I Barata, I Llovera, D Riccardi, R Mayerhoff, J Childress, E Livote, A Litroff, M Ward, A Sama. A Prospective Study of School Preparedness for Medical and Traumatic Emergencies. The Internet Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2005 Volume 3 Number 1.
Abstract
Introduction
The purpose of this study is to determine if schools have essential resources and equipment to deal with a medical or traumatic emergency. There are recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the American Heart Association, American National Red Cross, National Association of School Nurses, National Association of State EMS Directors, National Association of EMS Physicians, National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians, Program for School Preparedness and Planning, National Center for Disaster Preparedness, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health and the National Consensus Group Report regarding resources and equipment necessary for schools in the presence of a school nurse and when non health-related personnel are available. {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}
Methods
Participants were informed in standardized way about how to complete the survey. To ensure anonymity the top of the survey contained a statement indicating that this was an anonymous survey of the school's preparedness to deal with medical and traumatic emergencies. We also asked the person filling out the survey not to include their name or the school's name on the survey to maintain anonymity.
The survey asked for the following information: person filling out the survey (principal or school nurse), if there is a nurse in the school, number of students, and the type of school (i.e., elementary, middle school, high school). There were 2 lists of items as recommended by a National Consensus Group Report {7}, as well as several questions, regarding AED in the schools such as training, where it is kept, and if it brought to the field during sports.
Results
The survey was sent to 323 schools with 154 schools responding (47.6%): Elementary 97 (63%), Middle 18 (12%), High 29 (19%), Middle & High 1 (0.7%), Early Childhood 1(0.7), and missing 8 (5.2%). A school nurse was present in 97% of schools. We obtained the following responses for essential minimum equipment and resources: 87% of schools reported emergency information cards on all staff, 96% had emergency information cards on all students, and 81% had an established relationship with local EMS personnel. 94% of schools had a staff member, other than the nurse, who had first aid training and 96 % of schools had staff, other than nurse, with CPR training. (Table 1)
Regarding advanced equipment and resources in schools with nurses the following was reported: 15% suction equipment, 22% cervical-spine immobilizer; 29% self-inflating resuscitation device, 51% oxygen, 59% albuterol inhalers and/or 56% nebulizer, and 73 % reported having epinephrine pens. (Table 2) While 97% of schools reported having automatic external defibrillator (AED) in the schools, 66% reported having pediatric pads and cables available. The AED is available in 26% of schools in the field during sports. AED are kept in the school gym in 21% of schools, in the health room in 25% of schools and in other, central location in 78% of schools. In the schools, 97% of the school nurses are trained to use the AED, 61% of the school principals, 55% of the teachers, 73% of the coaches and 1% students. The data for high schools regarding AED is as follows: 93% reported having AED, 56% bring the AED to the field during sports events; it is kept in the gym in 33% of schools, in the health room in 33% and in a central location in 85%; 96 % of high school nurses are trained to use it, 52% of principals, 70% of teachers, 89% of coaches, 7% of students.
Limitations
This is a self reported study which may be limited by the geographic and socio-economic population of this area. The local laws in a particular region may also influence whether equipment or staffing is present.
Discussion
School-based health services have evolved from primarily controlling communicable diseases to comprehensive programs with direct services, education, and improvement of the school environment.{9} The school health services have to deal with a wide spectrum of acute and chronic illnesses: anaphylaxis, asthma, developmental disabilities, diabetes, drug reactions, infection and infestations, syncope, seizures; trauma related injuries (sports, violence, guns, fights and abuse), lab injuries (burns, explosions, poisonings, eye injuries), and behavioral management (drugs, school phobia, mass hysteria, stress debriefing, suicide attempts). {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}The Medical Emergency Response Plan for Schools {1,2,3,4} encourages every school to develop a program that reduces the incidence of life-threatening emergencies, and maximizes the chances of intact survival from an emergency. Such a program will have the potential to save the greatest number of lives, with the most efficient use of school personnel and equipment.
The equipment is variable in schools. In a study of public schools in a rural state it was found that emergency equipment available varies widely: oxygen 20%, artificial airways 30%, cervical collars 22%, splints 69%.{10} In our study, we found that schools were well equiped with basic emergency supplies and resources such as first-aid/CPR training. However, we found the schools lacking equipment such as suction devices, cervical-spine immobilizer, self-inflating resuscitation device, oxygen, albuterol inhalers and/or nebulizer, and epinephrine pen.
Another issue of interest is the presence of AED in schools. In May 2002, Governor George Pataki signed legislation (N.Y. Education Law, Article 19, ยง 917, S. 10577) requiring schools in New York State to have AED available for use no later than December 2002. Although sudden cardiac arrest has been reported in non-athletic adolescents during sedentary activities, the risk of sudden cardiac arrest appears to be lower in high school students who do not play competitive sports than in athletes{11,12,13} When data from the EMS systems are examined, the risk of sudden cardiac arrest in elementary school-age children appears to be much lower than that reported in non-athletic high school-age students, and substantially lower than that reported in high school athletes. {14} From the limited available information regarding AED use in the pediatric population it appears that high school students who participate in competitive sports would benefit the most from the availability of AEDs. In our study we found that 93% of high schools reported AED in the schools, but only 56 % of schools bring the defibrillator to the field during sports. There seems to be a need to evaluate the best place to keep an AED in the school: a central location so that everyone knows where it is, since adult teachers as well as visitors may well make use of the AED far more than the even the highest risk group of students; or, at sporting events, which is problematic since there could be several events taking place at the same time. Physicians can provide insight into early defibrillation programs {15} and can play an important role in the success of AED programs by providing training, and insight into the implementation program.
Conclusions
We found that the schools were well equipped with basic emergency supplies and training. However, the schools were lacking in advanced equipment. We found most schools to have AEDs, but not all schools were compliant with the mandate to have AEDs in every school. The AEDs are kept in different locations, depending on the school, and in some cases brought to the field during a sports event.
Correspondence to
Isabel Barata, MD 149-36 Raleigh Street Ozone Park, New York, 11417 IBARATA@aol.com