ISPUB.com / IJANP/7/2/6848
  • Author/Editor Login
  • Registration
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

ISPUB.com

Internet
Scientific
Publications

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Latest Articles
  • Disclaimers
  • Article Submissions
  • Contact
  • Help
  • The Internet Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice
  • Volume 7
  • Number 2

Original Article

Risk For Ineffective Breastfeeding: An Ethnographic Report

A Cavalcante de, L Neto David, V Ribeiro de, V Lucena de, B da Silva

Keywords

breastfeeding, early weaning, nursing diagnosis, risk

Citation

A Cavalcante de, L Neto David, V Ribeiro de, V Lucena de, B da Silva. Risk For Ineffective Breastfeeding: An Ethnographic Report. The Internet Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice. 2004 Volume 7 Number 2.

Abstract

The research was organized as a cross-sectional study with qualitative approach through ethnographic methodology. It was conducted to identify the phenomena that can interfere in the breastfeeding. Interrupted Breastfeeding was adopted as a nursing diagnosis by NANDA in 1990. The purpose of the study was to increase the usefulness of this diagnosis by developing a new nomenclature related with a new definition by revising and testing, from a client perspective, a list of risk factors. Risk for ineffective breastfeeding was defined like this: a situation in which the mother and her baby deal with negatives experiences in the breastfeeding process by influence of biological, psychological, economical and social risk factors.

 

Introduction

Breastfeeding is in decline world wide and depends on the local customs. The social and economic progress has provided an inverse reason regarding to breastfeeding1,2,3,4

The Brazilian government initiated in 1981 the National Program of Incentive to the Maternal Breastfeeding with the objective of changing the early weaning high index in the country. Considering that internal projects do not resolve this question, international and national agencies have committed in uncovering this situation that afflicts the Brazilian mothers5,6,7,8,9.

Some studies about breastfeeding have not only shown advantages of this practice, but as well some difficulties regarding early weaning due to factors diversified which interfere in this process10,11,12,13,14,15.

Literature Review

Breastfeeding is an active process which requires two participants: mother and her baby. This process is a personal choice and can't be induced by parents, friends, doctors, nurses, husband or other people. It is a personal decision that a woman makes according her needs such as biological, psychological, social and economical14,15,16,17,18.

In the last decade,s the social and economic factors has influenced and determined changes in the life of mothers and their babies. Women and infants in developing countries have been also the most vulnerable to problems caused by illnesses that weakend them and consequently prevented them from breastfeed, often causing death19,20.

Statistical studies reveal that even being objects of the sanitary vigilance, mothers and infants are not being watched properly by the Integral Aid Programs at Woman Health (PAISM), and Integral Aid Programs at Infant Health (PAISC). WHO Committee Experts in the Mother and Infant Health uncovered that social and economic factors such as the wife participation in the work, maternal malnutrition, inefficient assistencials programs, as well as lack of education in health were important in trials of breastfeeding5,6.

These risk factors demonstrate the importance of a nurse. Steele21 affirmed: “The nurse as the mediator serves as an intermediary in the clinic, school and community. The nurse as the support person shows awareness of the client's needs, provides appropriate interventions, assists in referrals, does client follow-up, provides a supportive milieu for interactions, and shows respect and acceptance of the client”.

Another factor that can influence the early weaning is the introduction of artificial milk. Experts about breastfeeding designate that main reason for the use of such foods are the own mother's relatives. In the majority of the times those factors are related to the family structure whose mother is breastfeeding. According to Renfrew et al22 , Wiezorek, Natapoff23, “the family structure and interaction may indeed influence actual health [breastfeeding] and health-seeking or health maintaining behaviors in some way. Health is determined by societal norms and affected by genetic inheritance and cultural and environmental factors”.

Genetic factors are also a problem in early weaning. The baby's birth with a defect or disorder is a traumatic event with the potential for either total disruption or growth of the involved family. Congenital problems in feeding may be result from diseases such as Pierre Robin Syndrome, Cleft Lip and Palate, or Choanal Atresia24.

In the literature, the etiology of the Pierre Robin Syndrome isn't clearly understood. It may be transmitted by a dominant gene with variable expressivity, or it may be the result of polygenic or multifactorial inheritance23. Several factors seem to be responsible for Cleft Lip and Palate. Polygenic inheritance and interaction between genetic and environmental factors (fetal viral infection, radiation, hypoxia and teratogenic insult of drugs during the lather part of the first trimester of pregnancy) may be the great responsible for malformation24.

In the United States, research has indicated some women that suffer from postpartum depression may be a great problem for the early weaning. A meta-analysis research revealed that patients with postpartum depression present with characteristics of anxiety, concentration impairments, and depressive mood “may exert effects on maternal-infant relationships”, resulting in causal effect for ineffective breasfeeding.25

Ziemer, Cooper, Pigeon26 evaluated the use of a polyethylene film dressing to reduce nipple pain, concluded that nipple pain is a substantial problem among breastfeeding due to occurrence of erythema, eschar formation, and skin fissures. Their study provided a reduction the nipple pain with use of an occlusive film but had limited influence on other observed factors.

In the last decades, Montessoro, Blixen27 inferred that economics factors had a growing influence in the pregnancy and childbirth. For these authors the “United States has no coherent policy on this issue resulting in confusion over exactly what the poverty problem is 28.

Methodology

A cohort study, descriptive and exploratory, using a qualitative approach through ethnographic methodology, was conducted to identify the phenomena that can interfere with breastfeeding. They were described as internal and external determinants factors of the early weaning.

The study purpose was to increase the usefulness of the diagnosis Interrupted Breastfeeding that was adopted as a nursing diagnosis by NANDA29 in 1990, by developing a new nomenclature related with a new definition by revising and testing, from a client perspective, resulting in a list of risk factors. Data were collected through a case study carried out with postpartum patients through six visits at home.

Using the steps for concept analysis outlined by Bardin30 a conceptual framework was created.

Findings

Case Study

A housewife, 18 years old, single woman, medium stature, illiterate, low-income woman was studied. She lived in a booth of canvas, given up by the army, in the highway BR-101 margins in João Pessoa city/Paraíba/Brazil's Northeast. The town was previously was flooded after a strong rain.

In the first visits at home the client was in the eighth month of pregnancy. She informed to us that she wasn't registered in a prenatal program, justifying that in the neighborhood there wasn't any prenatal service. In this first contact, she was anxious, nervous, scared and insecure; therefore she didn't relate to us any new fact about the care of her baby, mainly correlating her situational crisis: hungry, misery and homelessness.

On the second day of the visits, she showed a considerable emotional equilibrium, presenting less tense and more opened to the dialogue.

During the third day, she was in the postpartum and informed for us that the delivery had occurred in the maternity. It was an operative delivery and had didn't receive any orientation regarding the surgery and anesthesia or if her baby would be with her in the joint lodging. According her statements, related for us:

“I didn't have vaginal delivery because the doctor said to me that I didn't have dilatation and I expected to eight to eleven hours and then I got the knife (...) was very bad do not feel my legs (...) I squeaked: doctor, where are my legs! “.

“I was crazy for seeing my daughter; they showed me only in another day”.

When we asked her about the baby's food, immediately she said us that she had introduced the artificial milk, affirming:

“My breasts are painful enough and I don't get breastfeed my baby and she cries hungry [...] both my breasts are opened [...] every time get in some people here for buying some merchandise and I'm shamed a lot of showing my breasts”.

During the forth day, we observed that the difficulties for the breastfeeding persited, therefore in her statement she argued for us:

“My breast milk is too little, the baby isn't satisfied. At night she cries a lot and I can't sleep. At sunrise I don't get to sleep (...) the noise in the trail, the heat (...) I'm so tired! Yesterday I was so nervous that I shouted with my baby and immediately my husband spanked me [...] I'm hungry a lot because I am breastfeeding [...] I feel a hole here in my stomach. My sister-in-law said to me I was going to get sick with this foolish of breastfeeding because she fed their three boys with cow milk and flour”.

During the fifth visit at her home, in the twentieth day of puerperium, she informed us that her baby had been hospitalized because she had an abscess in the left eye. She wouldn't be with her baby in the hospital after surgery and wouldn't be able to stand by in the hospital for a long time indicating that the hospital unit wouldn't offer conditions for resting or to give her some foods. At this occasion the client complained to us of breasts engorgement.

During the sixth and last day of visits at home, we detected that the baby still was hospitalized with a diagniosis of pneumonia. The baby remained hospitalized for fifteen days and returning to live with her mother after this episode. She didn't breastfeed anymore, being introduced definitely the artificial milk for her baby.

Definition

Risk For ineffective Breastfeeding was defined like this: Situation in which the mother and her baby deal with negatives experiences in breastfeeding process by influence of biological, psychological, economical and social risk factors.

Risk Factors

Figure 1

Conclusion

Based on information analysis, it was determined that there are two attributes for validating the content and the construct of Risk For Ineffective Breastfeeding: For this study, the two critical attributes must be presented before determining the diagnosis of Risk for Ineffective Breastfeeding:

  1. A relationship that exists between the client and the factors of risk environmental external and,

  2. The client has experienced ineffective breastfeeding caused by one or more negative situation in their life or impaired life-style.

Additional studies should be done using expert nurses selected systematically from an interest's group of Risk For Ineffective Breastfeeding to identify and to validate others factors of risk.

Correspondence to

Araújo Ednaldo Cavalcante de, PhD, RN. Nursing School. Federal University of Pernambuco/Brazil's Northeast. ednenjp@ig.com.br Address: Rua: Severino Nicolau de Melo, 582 - Edifício Ilha da Restinga, Ap. 904-b - CEP: 58036-260 – Bessa – João Pessoa (PB) – Northeast of the Brazil

References

1. Hauck, YI, Dimmock, JE. Evolution of an information booklet on breastfeeding duration: a clinical trial. Journal Advanced Nursing.1994; 20 (5): 836-43.
2. Dennis C, Hodnett E, et al. The effect of peer support on breast-feeding duration among primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal.2002; 166 (1): 21-8.
3. Fredrickson DD. Effects of breastfeeding promotion by WIC nutrionists an nursery discharge packs among a biracial sample of rural WIC participants in North Carolina. From thesis: Breastfeeding breastfeeding promotion by WIC in North Carolina. University of North Carolina; 1995.
4. Britten J, Broadfoot M. Breastfeeding support in Scotland. British Journal of Midwifery. 2002; 10 (5): 292-6.
5. Hill R. Breast Feeding. American Academy of Pediatrics; 1981: 1,2.
6. Ministério da Saúde (Br). Assistência integral à saúde da mulher. Bases de ação programática. Centro de documentação do Ministério da Saúde. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 1985.
7. Ministério da Saúde (Br). Assistência integral à saúde da criança. Modelo de avaliação de implementação de programa. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 1998.
8. Ricco RG. Aleitamento natural. In: Woiski JR. Nutrição e dietética em pediatria. 4ª ed. São Paulo (SP): Atheneu; 1995: 55-88.
9. Carvalho MR, Muxi CM. Estamos promovendo a amamentação de maneira eficaz? 5º Encontro Nacional de Aleitamento Materno; 1997 Setembro 17-20; Londrina; Paraná. Londrina: HURNP; 1997: 46.
10. Nakano AMS. O Aleitamento materno no cotidiano feminino. [doutorado]. Ribeirão Preto (SP): Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto/USP; 1996.
11. Bitar MAF. Aleitamento materno: um estudo etnográfico sobre os costumes crenças e tabus ligados a esta prática. [dissertação]. Belém (PA): Centro de Ciências da Saúde Departamento de Enfermagem/Universidade Federal do Pará; 1995.
12. Javorski M. Os significados do aleitamento materno para mães de prematuros em cuidado canguru. [dissertação]. Ribeirão Preto (SP): Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto/USP; 1997.
13. Silva IA. Amamentar: uma questão de assumir riscos ou garantir benefícios. [dissertação]. São Paulo (SP): Escola de Enfermagem/USP; 1994.
14. Arantes CIS. O fenômeno amamentação: uma proposta compreensiva. [dissertação]. Ribeirão Preto (SP): Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto/USP; 1991.
15. Mota AC. Ideologia implícita no discurso da amamentação materna e estudo retrospectivo comparando o crescimento e a mortalidade de lactentes em uso de leite humano e leite de vaca. [dissertação]. Belo Horizonte (MG): Faculdade de Medicina/Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; 1990.
16. Coombs, DW, Reynolds, K et al. A self-help program to increase breastfeeding among low-income women. Journal of Nutrition Education; 1998, 30 (4): 203-9.
17. Rojjanasrirat, W. (2000). The effects of a nusrsing intervention on breastfeeding duration among mothers planning to return to work. Thesis. University of Kansas.
18. Handerson, A, Stamp, G et al.. Pospartum positioning an attachment education for increasing breastfeeding: a randomized trial. Birth; 2003, 28 (4): 236-42.
19. Organizacíon Mundial de La Salud. Nuevas tendencias y métodos de asistencia maternoinfantil en los servicios de salud. Ginebra; 1976: 11-2.
20. Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS). (1994). Fatores de saúde que podem interferir na amamentação. In: Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS). Alimentação infantil. Bases fisiológicas. São Paulo (SP): IBFAN Brasil e Instituto de Saúde, OMS, OPAS e UNICEF Brasil; 39-48.
21. Steele, S. Child health and the family: nursing concepts and management. Galveston. Masson Publishing; 1981: 674.
22. Renfrew, MJ, Woolridge, MW et al. Enabling women to breastfeed: a review of practices which promote or inhibit breastfeeding, with evidence-based guidance for practice. Norwich: Stationery Office; 2000.
23. Wiezorek, RR, Natapoff, JN. A conceptual approach to the nursing of children: health care from birth through adolescence. Philadelphia. Lippincott Company; 1981: 42-7.
24. Olds, SB, London, ML, Ladewing, PA. Maternal-newborn nursing: a family-centered approach. 2. ed. California, Addison-Wesley; 1984: 848-0.
25. Wbeck, CT. The effects of postpartum depression on maternal-infant interaction: a meta-analysis. Nursing Research; 1995, 44 (5): 272-6.
26. Ziemer, MM, Cooper, DM, Pigeon, JG. Evaluation of a dressing to reduce nipple pain and improve nipple skin condition in breastfeeding women. Nursing Research; 1995, 44 (6): 347-51.
27. Montessoro, AC, Blixen, CE. Public policy and adolescent pregnancy: a reexamination of the issues. Nursing OutLook; 1996, 44 (1): 3
28. Porteous, R, Kaufman, K et al. The effect of individualized professional support on duration of breastfeeding: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Human Lactation; 2000, 16 (4): 303-8.
29. NORTH AMERICAN NURSING DIAGNOSIS ASSOCIATION: Nursing diagnosis, definitions & classification 1995/1996. Philadelphia (PA); 1994: 7.
30. Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70; 1977.

Author Information

Araújo Ednaldo Cavalcante de, PhD, RN
Nursing School, Federal University of Pernambuco/Brazil's Northeast

Lopes Neto David, PhD, RN
Nursing School, Federal University of Pernambuco/Brazil's Northeast

Vasconcelos Eliane Maria Ribeiro de, PhD, RN
Nursing School, Federal University of Pernambuco/Brazil's Northeast

Vasconcelos Maria Gorete Lucena de, PhD, RN
Nursing School, Federal University of Pernambuco/Brazil's Northeast

Bezerra Simone Maria Muniz da Silva, PhD, RN
Nursing School, Federal University of Pernambuco/Brazil's Northeast

Download PDF

Your free access to ISPUB is funded by the following advertisements:

 

BACK TO TOP
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

© 2013 Internet Scientific Publications, LLC. All rights reserved.    UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy