ISPUB.com / IJA/22/2/5840
  • Author/Editor Login
  • Registration
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

ISPUB.com

Internet
Scientific
Publications

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Latest Articles
  • Disclaimers
  • Article Submissions
  • Contact
  • Help
  • The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology
  • Volume 22
  • Number 2

Original Article

Effect of intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine on anesthetic requirements and time to tracheal extubation in elective adult heart surgery patients. A retrospective cohort study

C Afanador, L Marulanda, G Torres, A Marín, C Vidal, G Silva

Keywords

anesthesia, cabg, dexmedetomidine, fast-track.

Citation

C Afanador, L Marulanda, G Torres, A Marín, C Vidal, G Silva. Effect of intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine on anesthetic requirements and time to tracheal extubation in elective adult heart surgery patients. A retrospective cohort study. The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology. 2009 Volume 22 Number 2.

Abstract


Background and Objectives: Scientific literature about the effects of intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine on anesthetic requirements and time to tracheal extubation in elective adult heart surgery patients is limited. Methods: A retrospective cohort study in adult patients who underwent uncomplicated elective heart surgery was performed. 103 adult patients who received intraoperative dexmedetomidine (DEX cohort) were matched with 97 patients who did not receive intraoperative dexmedetomidine (control cohort). Matching by age, gender and type of heart surgery was done. Intraoperative requirements of anesthetics, tracheal extubation in the operating room and time to tracheal extubation in the ICU were extracted from their medical charts. Results: Both cohorts had similar demographic and preoperative characteristics. DEX cohort received smaller intraoperative anesthetic doses of fentanyl (3.2 mg/kg ± 1.3 vs control 12.5 mg/kg ± 5.9, p= 0.0001), thiopental (3.4 mg/kg ± 1.5 vs control 4.0 mg/kg ± 1.6, p= 0.018), and pancuronium (6.5 mg ± 2.3 vs control 8.0 mg ± 1.8, p= 0.0001). Frequency of intraoperative use of thiopental was low in DEX cohort patients compared with control group (81.6 % vs control 97.9%, p= 0.0001), as midazolam (22.3 % vs control 67%, p= 0.0001) and pancuronium (47.6 % vs control 98%, p= 0.0001). Time to tracheal extubation was shorter in DEX cohort (197 ± 118 min vs control 314 ± 265 min, p= 0.002). Tracheal extubation in the operating room was more frequent in the DEX cohort (46.6% vs control 9.3%, p= 0.0001). Postoperative hospital and UCI lengths of stay were similar in both cohorts.Conclusions: Intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine as coadjuvant of fentanyl-isoflurane based anesthesia for elective heart surgery in adult patients could reduce anesthetic requirements and facilitate early postoperative tracheal extubation.

 

Introduction

Dexmedetomidine is an 2-agonist approved in 1999 by FDA for sedation in adult patients in the ICU setting. Previous clinical trials in non-cardiac surgery demonstrate how the use of dexmedetomidine reduces requirements of endovenous and inhalational anesthetic agents, provides intraoperative hemodynamic stability and reduces the requirements of postoperative opioid analgesics (1-6). The use of dexmedetomidine in the ICU , where it could facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilation and improve quality of sedation and pain control for postoperative sedation in patients following cardiac surgery has been described in multiple clinical trials (7-10). However, there is limited information about the intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine in cardiac surgery as a coadjuvant of the anesthetic technique.

In 2003, our cardiovascular anesthesia department introduced progressively dexmedetomidine as part of the anesthetic technique in elective adult heart surgery. Based on this initial experience we designed a retrospective cohort study to describe the effects of intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine on anesthetic requirements, postoperative analgesic and sedative requirements, and the time to tracheal extubation. ICU length of stay and postoperative hospital length of stay were also studied. Indirectly, we also studied the effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative inflammatory response.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was approved by Institutional Review Board in Fundación Valle del Lili.

From the institutional cardiac surgery database, adult patients, who underwent heart surgery between January 1 2004 and December 31 2006, were identified. These medical records were reviewed by the authors for study eligibility and following inclusion criteria : 1) elective procedure, 2) older than 18 years, 3) left ventricular eyection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 45 %, and 4) no surgical complication leading to reintervention or prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Patients Selection

Dexmedetomidine cohort: Intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine was identified in 103 patients who meet the inclusion criteria (DEX cohort) .

Control cohort: Using the same database and inclusion criteria the 103 patients in the dexmedetomidine cohort were matched for gender, age and type of surgery performed with 97 patients who did not use intraoperative dexmedetomidine (1 : 1 ratio aprox.).

Usual Anesthesia Technique

This is a brief description of a typical anesthetic technique for adult heart surgery at Fundación Valle del Lili: all anesthetic agents are administered at discretion of the anesthesiologist in charge of the case. Midazolam 7.5 mg per oral route is the most common premedication agent administered the night before surgery. Anesthesia induction is provided tipically with the use of fentanyl and thiopental and/or midazolam. Pancuronium, rocuronium and succinylcholine are the neuromuscular relaxants available for tracheal intubation. Anesthesia is maintained with continuous inhaled isoflurane and fentanyl boluses as required. At the end of surgery, anesthesiologists are autonomous to decide to extubate or not the patient’s trachea in the operating room. Morphine is the opioid analgesic usually administered for transitional analgesia before transferring the patient to the ICU.

When used, dexmedetomidine 1 g/kg was administered by i.v. infusion in ten minutes with the induction of anesthesia and maintained at 0.5 g.kg-1.h-1 until the end of surgery.

ICU care

Management of patients in the ICU is directed by intensivist physicians based in their protocols of pain control, sedation and mechanical ventilation weaning.

Data and Statistical Analysis

A Case Report Form (CRF) was filled for each included patient with the following data extracted from the medical chart:

- Demographics: Gender, age, weight, cardiovascular disease that indicated the surgery, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) % and use of beta-blockers.

- Preoperative information: Premedication, serum creatinine, and leukocyte count.

- Surgical information: Surgical procedure performed, aortic clamp time (if applicable), CPB time (if applicable), surgical time and anesthetic time.

- Anesthesia technique: Bolus dose and maintenance dose of dexmedetomidine (if applicable), use and total intraoperative doses of fentanyl, midazolam, thiopental, neuromuscular relaxants and morphine. Tracheal extubation (if applicable).

- UCI information: Sedative drugs used, sedation time, time to tracheal extubation, morphine doses at 24 and 48 hours after arrival to ICU, length of stay in ICU, leukocyte count at arrival and 24 h after.

- Postoperative information: Postoperative length of stay in the hospital .

Statistical analysis: Data was collected in a web based database on a platform MySQL (Hughes Technologies, Australia). Values are expressed as mean ± SD and 95% confidence intervals, median and interquartile range or proportions for continous or categorical variables respectively. A bivariate analysis was performed with χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests in categorical variables or Student´s t test or rank sum test in continuous variables for samples matched. A p value < 0.05 was considered as significant statistically.

Results

- Demographic characteristics: Gender, age, weight, cardiovascular disease that indicate the surgery, LVEF % and use of beta-blockers were similar in both cohorts (table1).

- Preoperative information: both cohorts had a similar rate of premedication. There were no significant differences in the preoperative values of serum creatinine and leukocyte count (table 1).

Figure 1
Table 1. Patient characteristics

- Surgical information: surgical procedures performed were similar in both cohorts, being coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), on and off pump, the most frecuent procedure performed, followed by valvular surgery, congenital heart disease correction, arrythmia and vascular surgery. Both cohorts had similar aortic clamp and CPB times. DEX cohort had longer surgical and anesthetic times vs control cohort (table 2).

Figure 2
Table 2. Surgical information

- Anesthesia technique: All DEX cohort patients received an initial i.v. bolus dose of 1 g/kg in 10 minutes of dexmedetomidine followed by a continuous i.v. infusion of 0.5 g.kg-1.h-1 until the end of surgery. All patients received intraoperative fentanyl. DEX cohort had a smaller fentanyl requirement compared with control cohort (3.2 ± 1.3 g/kg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9 – 3.4 g/kg vs 12.5 ± 5.9 g/kg, 95% CI, 11.3 – 13.7 g/kg, p = 0.0001). Less patients in the DEX cohort received thiopental with respect to control cohort, and the thiopental dose in the DEX cohort was smaller versus control cohort. Less patients in the DEX cohort received midazolam with respect to control cohort, although the dose of midazolam used was similar in both cohorts. Less patients in the DEX cohort received neuromuscular relaxants compared with control cohort. The pancuronium dose used in DEX cohort was smaller versus control cohort. More patients in the DEX cohort received succinylcholine compared with control cohort. Both cohorts had a similar percent of patients that received morphine, however, in the DEX cohort the morphine dose was smaller than control cohort. More patients in the DEX cohort were extubated in the operating room (46.6%; 95% CI, 36.3 – 55.6 % vs control cohort 9.3%; 95% CI, 3.5 – 15.1 %, p = 0.0001) (table 3).

Figure 3
Table 3. Anesthetic technique

ICU and postoperative information: There was no significant difference between cohorts with respect to the use of sedative agents. The most used sedative agent in the DEX cohort was dexmedetomidine, and midazolam was the most used in the control cohort. Both DEX and control cohort had an small fraction of patients in whom fentanyl was used in the ICU. Mean sedation time in the ICU was similar in both cohorts. Time to tracheal extubation in DEX cohort was shorter with respect to control cohort ( 197 min ± 118; 95% CI 163 – 230 min vs 314 min ± 265; 95% CI 258 – 370 min, p = 0.002). Requirement of morphine during first 24 and 48 postoperative hours was similar in both cohorts. Length of stay in the ICU was similar in both cohorts. Postoperative length of stay in the hospital was similar in both cohorts. Leukocyte count at arrival to the ICU in DEX cohort was smaller versus control cohort; however, after 24 hours the leukocyte count was similar in both cohorts (table 4).

Figure 4
Table 4. ICU and postoperative information

Discussion

Effect of dexmedetomidine on anesthetic requirements

In this study the intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine allowed a significant reduction in the anesthetic requirements. Mean dose of fentanyl was reduced from 12.5 g/kg to 3.2 g/kg, equivalent to a 74% reduction in the requirement. Clinical research about the use of dexmedetomidine in anesthesia for heart surgery is scarce, difficulting results comparison. In 1997 Jalonen et. al. administered an 1.5 g/kg i.v. bolus of dexmedetomidine followed by continuous i.v. infusion of 0.42 g.kg-1.h-1 to evaluate the intraoperative hemodynamic behavior in patients who underwent CABG. The use of dexmedetomidine reduced suplementary fentanyl boluses. However, the initial induction dose of fentanyl in both groups was high (30 g/kg) (11). In 2006, Briones et. al. described the use of dexmedetomidine in patients who underwent CABG surgery in a non-randomized study. Dexmedetomidine was administered by i.v. bolus dose of 0.1 g/kg in 10 minutes before anesthesia induction and followed by an 0.5 g.kg-1.h-1 i.v. infusion. That study showed a total reduction in the fentanyl dose of 48%, but the mean dose of fentanyl in the control group was high (9.3 g.kg-1.h-1) and the time to tracheal extubation was not registered(12). In 2006 , Vargas et. al. described, in a prospective non-randomized study, how the intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine with continuous i.v. infusion between 0.3 – 0.5 g.kg-1.h-1 attenuated the hypertensive intraoperative response to surgical stimuli. Again, total dose of fentanyl was high (47 g/kg) in control and treated groups, and no difference in the time to tracheal extubation was found (6.8 hours in the dexmedetomidine group vs 8.2 hours in the no-dexmedetomidine group) (13).

During last two decades the new anesthetic techniques for heart surgery had reduced fentanyl doses to facilitate a faster postoperative weaning from mechanical ventilation (fast-track techniques). In the current study, mean total dose of fentanyl in the control cohort was 12.3 g/kg, which is comparable with total doses reported with fast-track balanced techniques with an inhalational agent (between 5 and 15 g/kg) (14-30). Our study also found that intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine reduced the total dose of thiopental, from 3.9 mg/kg to 3.3 mg/kg. This reduction, however, probably has no clinical relevance. Although thiopental doses were similar between cohorts, less patients in the DEX cohort received thiopental. Something similar happened with the intraoperative use of midazolam. This finding could be explained by the sedative effect of dexmedetomidine, which could allow to induce hypnosis with a reduction in thiopental or midazolam doses, but also making possible to co-induce hypnosis with an inhalational agent, without using thiopental or midazolam.

Another important finding in this study was that less patients received neuromuscular relaxants in the dexmedetomidine cohort. Use of neuromuscular relaxants in heart surgery was considered for anesthesiologists a must in a survey in USA (31), and the discussion has been focused on the specific agent to be used, favoring those with intermediate-acting agents like rocuronium, cisatracurium and atracurium (32). No use of neuromuscular relaxants during heart surgery has been described in fast-track anesthesia techniques (33), considering that once the trachea is intubated, immobility is provided by general anesthesia (34).

With respect to the reduced requirement of morphine for transitional analgesia in patients in the dexmedetomidine cohort, we have to annotate that our usual dose of 50 g/kg prolonged the wake up time when dexmedetomidine was used intraoperatively, reducing the probability to extubate the trachea in the operating room. That finding leaded us to reduce morphine dose. Morphine requirement during the first and second postoperative day was similar in both cohorts. Pain control management in our ICU is not based on the use of validated scales of pain, but just for the physical or verbal pain expressions of each patient and for the free interpretation given by the nurse. Postoperative use of dexmedetomidine in heart surgery patients has been shown to reduce opioid analgesic doses (35).The fact that most patients in dexmedetomidine cohort did not receive dexmedetomidine in the ICU could explain why postoperative morphine requirement was similar in both cohorts. In that sense it would be interesting to have continued dexmedetomidine administration in the ICU. Most patients in this study did not receive postoperative sedation because our UCI policy for heart surgery patients to limit its use in order to facilitate an early tracheal extubation.

Effect of dexmedetomidine time to tracheal extubation

Tracheal extubation in the operating room was more frequent in dexmedetomidine cohort patients. The time to tracheal extubation in the operating room was about 15 to 20 minutes. This time was estimated by the existent difference between the anesthetic times of cohorts. Since this is not a prospective randomized study, it is relevant to annotate that the significative difference in the percentage of patients whose tracheas were extubated in the operating room could not be explained totally by the use of dexmedetomidine or the reduction in the use of other anesthetics or neuromuscular relaxants, because it is not clear how the anesthesiologist in each case took the decision to extubate or not the trachea in the operating room.

One goal of fast-track anesthesia techniques is to extubate patients within 1-6 hours after arrival to ICU (36,37). In our study, dexmedetomidine treated patients had shorter tracheal extubation time in the ICU and the mean time to tracheal extubation was less than 6 hours. Weaning from mechanical ventilation of patients in this study was conducted by intensivist physicians according to their policies with no predefined intention to treat based on the use of intraoperative dexmedetomidne, so it is possible that the difference in time to tracheal extubation between cohorts in the ICU could be explained at some degree by the intraoperative exposition to dexmedetomidine.

Fast-track anesthesia techniques that facilitate early tracheal extubation has been associated with better postoperative hemodynamics (38), lower postoperative incidence of atrial fibrillation (39), lower incidence of postoperative respiratory infections (40), reduction in care costs and optimization of hospital resources (41-43). Based on the results of this study, dexmedetomidine could be a potential anesthetic agent to be included in fast-track and ultra fast-track techniques.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on lengths of ICU and postoperative hospital stay

Both cohorts of this study had similar lengths of ICU and postoperative hospital stay, and values were comparable with those previously reported, by most clinical trials on adult elective heart surgery, where the range of length of stay in the ICU is from 18 to 40 hours, and the range of length of postoperative hospital stay is from 5 to 7 days (44-46).

In our study, exposition to dexmedetomidine facilitates an early tracheal extubation but did not change the length of stay in the ICU or the postoperative hospital length of stay. This is a common finding with other clinical trials about the use of fast-track techniques in which a shorter tracheal extubation time did not change the length of stay in ICU or length of postoperative hospital stay (42,43,44). Use of fast-track anesthesia techniques that facilitates early tracheal extubation can not induce a shorter length of stay in the ICU or in the hospital without a change in the policy of management from the ICU caretakers. In our institution the time to discharge a patient from the ICU after elective heart surgery does not depend on the place (operating room or ICU) or the time of tracheal extubation, but on fixed blocks of time of postoperative care.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on the inflammatory response

In a non-specific form this study evaluated the effect of intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine on the postoperative inflammatory response with the leokocyte count as a marker. Leukocyte count has been included as diagnostic parameter of inflammatory processes like the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) (47). The postoperative peak value of the leukocyte count has been identified as an independent risk factor of atrial fibrillation after valvular and coronary surgery (48,49). Atrial fibrillation usually appears in the second postoperative day in coincidence with the peak of the inflammatory response (50,51). The use of dexmedetomidine for sedation after major surgery in adults has been associated with a reduction in the expression of pro-inflammatory interleukins, eliciting a novel and potential use for this drug (7). In our study, dexmedetomidine cohort had a lower leukocyte count at arrival to ICU, but data about complications, like atrial fibrillation, was not registered. It would be interesting to determine if this reduction in the leukocyte count depends on the time of administration or in the administered dose.

Limitations of the study

Retrospective studies have limitations known for all, in special about information bias. In this study there was not control over variables such like anesthetics and anesthetic’s doses choosen. Also it was possible that data registered in the medical charts reviewed were inaccurate. There was no way to obtain precise data about isoflurane dose administered . It was not possible to know exactly how the anesthesiologist in charge determined if the patient’s trachea could or not be extubated in the operating room. There was no systematic registry and following of intraoperative and postoperative complications, so important safety issues could be lost. Cost-effective analysis was not considered in this study.

Conclusions

Inclusion of intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine as coadjuvant of fentanyl-isoflurane based anesthesia for elective heart surgery in adult patients could reduce anesthetic requirements and facilitate early postoperative tracheal extubation. It is possible that dexmedetomidine has a role in the modulation of the perioperative inflammatory response. Prospective and randomized control trials are needed to determine the safety and potential utility of dexmedetomidine as part of the anesthetic technique in heart surgery.

References

1. Aantaa R, Kanto J, Scheinin M, Kallio A, Scheinin H. Dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, reduces anesthetic requirements for patients undergoing minor gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiology 1990;73:230-5.
2. Aantaa R, Jaakola ML, Kallio A, Kanto J. Reduction of the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane by dexmedetomidine. Anesthesiology 1997;86:1055-60.
3. Lawrence CJ, De Lange S. Effects of a single pre-operative dexmedetomidine dose on isoflurane requirements and peri-operative haemodynamic stability. Anaesthesia 1997; 52:736-44.
4. Gurbet A, Basagan-Mogol E, Turker G, Ugun F, Kaya FN, Ozcan B. Intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine reduces perioperative analgesic requirements. Can J Anaesth 2006;53:646-52.
5. Yildiz M, Tavlan A, Tuncer S, Reisli R, Yosunkaya A, Otelcioglu S. Effect of dexmedetomidine on haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: perioperative haemodynamics and anaesthetic requirements. Drugs R D 2006;7:43-52.
6. Dholakia C, Beverstein G, Garren M, Nemergut C, Boncyk J, Gould JC. The impact of perioperative dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative narcotic use and duration of stay after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:1556-9.
7. Venn RM, Bryant A, Hall GM, Grounds RM. Effects of dexmedetomidine on adrenocortical function, and the cardiovascular, endocrine and inflammatory responses in postoperative patients needing sedation in the intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86:650-656.
8. Herr DL, Sum-Ping ST, England M. ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: dexmedetomidine based versus propofol-based sedation regimens. J Cardiothoracic Vasc Anesthesia 2003; 17:576-584.
9. Elbaradie S, El Mahalawy FH, Solyman AH. Dexmedetomidine vs. propofol for short-term sedation of postoperative mechanically ventilated patients. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2004;16:153-8.
10. Szumita PM, Baroletti SA, Anger KE, Wechsler ME. Sedation and analgesia in the intensive care unit: evaluating the role of dexmedetomidine. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:37-44. Review.
11. Jalonen J, Hynynen M, Kuitunen A, Heikkilä H, Perttilä J, Salmenperä M, altonen M, Aantaa R, Kallio A. Dexmedetomidine as an Anesthetic Adjunct in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting [Clinical Investigation] Anesthesiology 1997;86:331-345.
12. Briones-Corona G, Moreno-Alatorre MA, Lozano-Noriega R. Dexmedetomidina para disminuir requerimientos anestésicos en pacientes sometidos a cirugía cardíaca con derivación cardiopulmonar. Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología 2006;29:20-25.
13. Vargas-Trujillo C, Álvarez-Rosales H, Molina-Méndez FJ, Rojas-Pérez E, Lespron-Robles MC. Dexmedetomidina en pacientes con hipertensión arterial en cirugía de revascularización coronaria. Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología 2005;28:91-95.
14. Parker FC, Story DA, Poustie S, Liu G, McNicol L. Time to Tracheal Extubation After Coronary Artery Surgery With Isoflurane, Sevoflurane, or Target-Controlled Propofol Anesthesia: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2004;18:613-619.
15. Cheng DC, Karski J, Peniston C, Asokumar B, Raveendran G, Carroll J, Nierenberg H, Roger S, Mickle D, Tong J, Zelovitsky J, David T, Sandler A. Morbidity outcome in early versus conventional tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized controlled trial.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:755-64.
16. Montes FR, Sanchez SI, Giraldo JC, Rincón JD, Rincón IE, Vanegas MV, Charris H. The Lack of Benefit of Tracheal Extubation in the Operating Room After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:776-780.
17. Delphin E, Jackson D, Gubenko Y, Botea A, Esrig B, Fritz W, Mavridis S. Sevoflurane Provides Earlier Tracheal Extubation and Assessment of Cognitive Recovery Than Isoflurane in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2007;21:690-695.
18. Flynn M, Reddy S, Shepherd W, Holmes C, Armstrong D, Lunn C, Khan K, Kendall S. Fast-tracking revisited: routine cardiac surgical patients need minimal intensive care. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2004;25:116–122.
19. Reis J; Mota JC; Ponce P; Costa-Pereira A; Guerreiro M. Early extubation does not increase complication rates after coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2002; 21:1026–1030.
20. Djaiani GN, Ali M, Heinrich L, Bruce J, Carroll J, Karski J, Cusimano RJ, Cheng DC. Ultra-Fast-Track Anesthetic Technique Facilitates Operating Room Extubation in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Revascularization Surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2001;15:152-157.
21. Scott BH, Seifert FC, Grimson R, Glass PS. Resource Utilization in On- and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Surgery: Factors Influencing Postoperative Length of Stay—An Experience of 1,746 Consecutive Patients Undergoing Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2005;19:26-31.
22. Sakaida K. Isoflurane anaesthesia with combined use of low dose fentanyl for open heart surgery. Masui 1998; 47:576–84.
23. Engoren MC, Kraras C, Garzia F. Propofol-Based Versus Fentanyl-Isoflurane-Based Anesthesia for Cardiac Surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 1998;112:177-181.
24. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H, Watts J, Bain D, Silvers A, Buckland MR. Remifentanil, Fentanyl, and Cardiac Surgery: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Costs and Outcomes. Anesth Analg 2002;95:805–12.
25. Srivastava AR, Banerjee A, Tempe DK, Mishra B, Muppiri V, Narang S, Singh H, Virmani S. A comprehensive approach to fast tracking in cardiac surgery: ambulatory low-risk open-heart surgery. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 2008;33:955—960.
26. Hemmerling T, Olivier JF, Le N, Prieto I, Bracco D. Myocardial protection by isoflurane vs. sevoflurane in ultrafast- track anaesthesia for off-pump aortocoronary bypass grafting. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2007; 25: 230-236.
27. Madan Mohan Maddali, Elizabeth Kurian, Jutta Fahr. Extubation time, hemodynamic stability, and postoperative pain control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: an evaluation of fentanyl, remifentanil, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with propofol for perioperative and postoperative management. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2006; 18: 605–610.
28. Michael C. Moon, Ahmed Abdoh, G. Andrew Hamilton, William G. Lindsay, Peter C. Duke, Edward A. Pascoe, Dario F. Del Rizzo. Safety and Efficacy of Fast Track in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. J Card Surg 2007; 16:319-326.
29. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Avram MJ, Vender JS. The Effects of Morphine and Fentanyl on the Inflammatory Response to Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Anesth Analg 2007;104:1334–42.
30. Milo Engoren, Glenn Luther, Nancy Fenn-Buderer. A Comparison of Fentanyl, Sufentanil, and Remifentanil for Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia.Anesth Analg 2001;93:859 –64.
31. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Vender JS, Marymont JH, Avram MJ. The Use of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Results of a National Postal Survey. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:1534-1539.
32. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Avram MJ, Vender JS, Rosengart TKImpact of shorter-acting neuromuscular blocking agents on fast-track recovery of the cardiac surgical patient. Anesthesiology 2002;96:600–6.
33. Metz, Samuel. Omission of Muscle Relaxants Is Another Clinically Available Alternative in Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2003; 97:1545.
34. Hemmings HC Jr, Flood P. Galloping in full pursuit of the mechanism of anesthetic immobility. Editorial views. Anesthesiology 2008; 108: 975-976.
35. Herr DL, Sum-Ping ST, England M. ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based sedation regimens. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003;17:576-84.
36. Horswell JL, Herbert MA, Prince SL, Mack MJ. Horswell. Routine Immediate Extubation After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: 514 Consecutive Patients. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2005; 19: 282-287.
37. Toraman F, Evrenkaya S, Yuce M, Göksel O, Karabulut H, Alhan C. Fast-track recovery in noncoronary cardiac surgery patients. Heart Surg Forum 2005;8:E61-4.
38. Gall SA Jr, Olsen CO, Reves JG, McIntyre RW, Tyson GS Jr, Davis JW, Rankin JS.Beneficial effects of endotracheal extubation on ventricular performance: Implications for early extubation after cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 95:819–27.
39. Edgerton JR, Herbert MA, Prince SL, Horswell JL, Michelson L, Magee MJ, Dewey TM, Edgerton ZJ, Mack MJ. Reduced Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Immediately Extubated After Off-Pump Coronary Artery BypassGrafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:2121–7.
40. Pawar M, Mehta Y, Khurana P, Chaudhary A, Kulkarni V, Trehan N. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: Incidence, risk factors, outcome, and microbiology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003;17:22-8.
41. Cheng DCH. Morbidity outcome in early versus conventional tracheal extubation following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112:755-764.
42. Cheng DCH, Karski J, Peniston C, Asokumar B. Early tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass surgery reduces costs and improves resource use: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesthesiology 1996; 85:1300-1310.
43. Myles PS, Daly DJ, Djaiani G, Lee A, Cheng DC.. A systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of fast-track cardiac anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:982-987.
44. Scott BH, Seifert FC, Grimson R, Glass PS. Resource Utilization in On- and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Surgery: Factors Influencing Postoperative Length of Stay—An Experience of 1,746 Consecutive Patients Undergoing Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005; 19: 26-31.
45. Watanabe Y, Kosaka M, Kusume Y, Suga T, Hatakenaka T, Omachi N, Irie H, Morita T. Fast-track Cardiac Anesthesia and Perioperative Management Appropriate for Early Rehabilitation after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery. Masui. 2004 Aug;53(8):898-902.
46. Cheng DC, Newman MF, Duke P, Wong DT, Finegan B, Howie M, Fitch J, Bowdle TA, Hogue C, Hillel Z, Pierce E, Bukenya D.The Efficacy and Resource Utilization of Remifentanil and Fentanyl in Fast-Track Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blinded Controlled, Multi-Center Trial. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1094–1102.
47. American Committee of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference Committee: ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference: Definitions for sepsis and multiple organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1992;20:864-74.
48. Lamm G, Auer J, Weber T, Berent R, Ng C, Eber B. Postoperative White Blood Cell Count Predicts Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2006; 1: 51-56.
49. Abdelhadi RH, Gurm HS, Van Wagoner DR, Chung MK. Relation of an Exaggerated Rise in White Blood Cells After Coronary Bypass or Cardiac Valve Surgery to Development of Atrial Fibrillation Postoperatively. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:1176–1178.
50. Aviles RJ, Martin DO, Apperson-Hansen C, Houghtaling PL, Rautaharju P, Kronmal RA, Tracy RP, Van Wagoner DR, Psaty BM, Lauer MS, Chung MK. Inflammation as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2003;108:3006-3010.
51. Gaudino M, Andreotti F, Zamparelli R, Di Castelnuovo A, Nasso G, Burzotta F, Iacoviello L, Donati MB, Schiavello R, Maseri A, Possati G. The _174G/C interleukin-6 polymorphism influences postoperative interleukin-6 levels and postoperative atrial fibrillation: Is atrial fibrillation an inflammatory complication? Circulation 2003; 108:II195-II199.

Author Information

Carlos Afanador, MD.
Staff anesthesiologist, Fundación Valle del Lili

Lorsis Marulanda, MD.
Cardiothoracic anesthesia fellow, Fundación Valle del Lili

Germán Torres, MD.
Staff anesthesiologist, Fundación Valle del Lili

Andrés Marín, MD.
Cardiothoracic anesthesia fellow, Fundación Valle del Lili

Carlos Vidal, MD.
Staff anesthesiologist, Fundación Valle del Lili

Gloria Silva, MD.
Staff anesthesiologist, Fundación Valle del Lili

Download PDF

Your free access to ISPUB is funded by the following advertisements:

 

BACK TO TOP
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

© 2013 Internet Scientific Publications, LLC. All rights reserved.    UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy