ISPUB.com / IJWH/7/2/14362
  • Author/Editor Login
  • Registration
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

ISPUB.com

Internet
Scientific
Publications

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Latest Articles
  • Disclaimers
  • Article Submissions
  • Contact
  • Help
  • The Internet Journal of World Health and Societal Politics
  • Volume 7
  • Number 2

Original Article

Levels and Determinants of Caesarean Deliveries in Egypt: Pathways to Rationalization

K Yassin, G Saida

Keywords

cesarean section, egypt, maternal health, safe motherhood., socioeconomic determinants

Citation

K Yassin, G Saida. Levels and Determinants of Caesarean Deliveries in Egypt: Pathways to Rationalization. The Internet Journal of World Health and Societal Politics. 2012 Volume 7 Number 2.

Abstract


Objective: To identify demographic and socioeconomic determinants of caesarean delivery in Egypt.Methods: A logistic regression model ascertained the association between cesarean delivery and 21 independent variables, including data of 7,916 women from the 2000 Demographic and Health Survey.Results: The log odds of cesarean delivery was significantly higher among women of younger age, with first and second order pregnancies, who received antenatal care during pregnancy, with previous experience of child death, who had ever terminated pregnancy and who resided in urban areas. Interestingly, maternal education, occupational status, current use of modern contraception and desire to have more children were not associated with cesarean delivery. Further, none of the socioeconomic variables or the women position indicators appeared to be significantly associated with cesarean delivery.Conclusion: Caesarean delivery might be overused or used for inappropriate indications in Egypt. The study proposes directions for action to rationalize cesarean delivery in Egypt.

 

Introduction

The incidence of cesarean delivery has risen significantly in Egypt. It is estimated that one of every sex deliveries today in Egypt is being carried out by a caesarean section [1]. This figure is almost three times higher than the early 1990s [2]. This dramatic increase raises several concerns of medical, ethical an economic importance. Further, the public health significance of this increase is strongly debated.

Some advance the argument that caesarean delivery is an indicator for availability of and accessibility to maternal health care services. The premise is that surgical interventions such as caesarean delivery are keys to avoid maternal mortality and morbidity due to pregnancy complications [3]. Caesarean section is a life saving procedure in cases of obstructed labor, eclampsia and intractable hemorrhage [4, 5]. Therefore, the proportion of deliveries with caesarean section was suggested to serve as a proxy for the extent to which health care facilities provide this essential element of obstetric care [3]. Further, the increase in caesarean section delivery could be explained by either the availability of modern medical exigencies or the increasing in the demand for hospital deliveries. These are all positive trends.

Contrarily, others have voiced several concerns about the rising trend of caesarean section deliveries. First, though caesarean section is a fairly safe surgical procedure, several studies have reported a statistically significant increase in the risk of acute and chronic complications [6 – 14] when compared with attended vaginal delivery.

Exposing women unnecessarily to an increased risk of these complications is medically and ethically unacceptable. Second, it is not uncommon that caesarean delivery is overused or used for inappropriate indications, i.e. for reasons not related to preserving the life and health of mother or infant. The procedure can be convenient and lucrative for physicians but carries risks for the woman, particularly when conducted in less than optimal conditions [3].

Third, unnecessary caesarean deliveries impose unjustified costs on the part of the patient and waste the medical and economic resources on the part of the health system [15-19]. Fourth, it is not known whether the trends are universal in all regions of Egypt. It is said that the increase in caesarean delivered has occurred in the rich urban centers. The proportion of caesarean deliveries in the poor and rural areas is not known. These are the areas where maternal deaths are higher and the need for emergency obstetric care is greater.

This study aims at generating knowledge in two areas, essential to resolving the controversy over caesarean deliveries in Egypt. First, it attempts to determine the time trends and spatial distribution of caesarean delivery in Egypt. Second, it intends to identify the demographic, biomedical and socioeconomic determinants of caesarean delivery. The goal is to prove a first step towards organizing caesarean delivery in the country.

Data and methods

Data for this study were driven from the Egypt Demographic and Health Survey in 2000. The survey was undertaken by the Ministry of Health and population to provide national level information on fertility, family planning and child and maternal health. In the survey a national representative sample of 8999 ever married woman (15 – 49 years old) were taken from 26 governorates in Egypt. The sample was selected using a weighted, multilevel, probability sampling technique.

In the survey women were asked to provide information about pregnancy, child birth and postnatal period of all pregnancies that toke place in the five-year period prior to the survey. Among various questions, they were asked whether the childbirth was made by a cesarean section. Further, data were collected about the demographic and socioeconomic background factors.

We included in the analysis the last birth of each woman only. This restriction was made to adjust for the hierarchical nature of data i.e. data about several births for the same woman. If this hierarchical nature was ignored, the results might have been biased since many of the statistical modeling techniques assume independence of observations. Another reason for this restriction is to shorten the recall period of mothers and ensure quality of maternal reporting.

The dependent variable was defined as a dichotomous variable, coded 1 for cesarean deliveries and 0 for vaginal deliveries. The independent variables included 19 factors, covering maternal, paternal and socioeconomic characteristics. These variables included maternal age at survey, maternal age at marriage, maternal age at first birth, maternal education, maternal occupation, fertility, whether the mother has ever had a terminated pregnancy or under 5 death, utilization of antenatal care, current use of modern contraception, desire to have more children, preceding birth interval, paternal age, paternal education, residence, type of toilet facility and whether they have a refrigerator. Furthermore, three indicators of women position and conjugal power were included in the analysis; whether the woman has a say on own health care, whether she has a say on large household purchases, and whether she has a say on visits to family or relatives. Finally, near birth problems were included as a variable.

A logistic regression model was used then to ascertain the association between cesarean delivery and the independent variables. If P is the probability of occurrence of cesarean delivery, then

Figure 1

where β is the vector of the unknown coefficient to be estimated and X is a vector of the independent variables that influence cesarean delivery. The general logistic regression model can be further stated as:

Figure 2

which indicates the log odds of the cesarean delivery as a linear function of the dependent variables.

Some of the independent variables were expected to be correlated and their inclusion in the analysis could have rendered the model instable or flawed. Therefore, all independent variables were tested for multicollinearity and when the correlation coefficient was above 0.65 for any two variables, one of the variables was removed from the logistic regression equation. For example, maternal age at marriage was correlated with maternal age at first birth. Likewise, fertility was correlated with pregnancy order. A forward conditional stepwise regression method was adopted and the predicted variables with highest R² (at the 0.05 level of significance) were retained. These were maternal age at first birth and fertility.

Results

The analysis included 7916 women, enrolled from 6 regions in Egypt. The age of respondent ranged between 15 and 49 (29.3±6.4 years). The mean age at marriage and at first births was 19.2±3.9 and 20.9±3.9 years, respectively. The parity of respondents ranged between 1 and 17 (3.4±2.2). About 56% of participants were able to read easily and 14.7% were then working.

The results showed that 11.4% of women delivered by cesarean section. Regional figures showed, however, great discrepancies. Upper Egypt, the poorest and most disadvantaged region of Egypt showed significantly lower rates of cesarean delivery than all other regions. The proportion of cesarean deliveries in Upper Egypt was 4.2% in urban areas and 6.9% of rural areas. Urban Lower Egypt had a proportion of 10.1%, compared with 12.8% in Rural Lower Egypt. The highest proportions were reported in the urban governorates 20% and the frontier governorates (20.9%).

Figure 3
Figure 1. Proportion of cesarean deliveries by region in Egypt

The association between the demographic and socioeconomic variables and cesarean deliveries is shown in table 1. There was a significant statistical association between maternal age and cesarean deliveries. The probability of cesarean deliveries among women aged 30 years and older was 0.8 that for women younger than 30.

The tendency to undergo cesarean section was two-fold higher among first and second order pregnancies than higher order pregnancies. The difference was statistically significant. Likewise, the probability of cesarean delivery was 2.4 higher if the mother received antenatal care during pregnancy.

Experiences of child deaths and pregnancy termination were associated with statically higher chances of cesarean delivery. For example, the probability of cesarean delivery was 1.5 higher among mothers who have ever experienced an U5 death compared with those who have never experienced an U5 death. Likewise, the likelihood of cesarean delivery was 1.3 higher among women who have ever terminated pregnancy compared with those who have never terminated pregnancy.

Residence showed a statistically significant association with cesarean delivery. Women residing the urban areas were shown to have a 1.7 higher chances of cesarean delivery than women residing in the rural areas. Finally, near birth problems, such as hemorrhage, prolonged or obstructed labor were associated with a 1.4 higher chances of cesarean delivery.

Maternal education, occupational status, current use of modern contraception and desire to have more children were not associated with cesarean delivery. Furthermore, none of the socioeconomic variables or the women position indicators appeared to be significantly associated with cesarean delivery. Finally, paternal characteristics such as age and education were shown to have no influence on cesarean delivery.

Figure 4
Table 1. Determinants of caesarean deliveries in Egypt

Discussion

The goal of this study was to determine the spatial levels and socioeconomic determinants of cesarean delivery in Egypt. The overall rate if cesarean delivery in Egypt was estimated at 11.4%, compared with 4.6% in 1992. There were wide variations in cesarean delivery rate among different regions. Rural and urban areas in Upper Egypt reported the lowest rates (4.2% and 6.9%, respectively), while urban and frontier governorates showed the highest rates (>20%).

The increase in cesarean delivery rates has been a global phenomenon, witnessed in both industrialized and developing countries throughout the last three decades. For example, the cesarean delivery rates in the United States showed a dramatic rise from 16% in the early 1980s to 25% in the early 1990s [20 - 22]. Although the rate had fallen to 21% in 1996, it is now rising again. Similar trends were observed in Canada [23, 24] Europe [25 – 31], Asia [32 – 35], Latin America [35 – 37] and Australia [38, 39].

Nevertheless, two features are peculiar to the Egyptian case. First, the pace of rise in cesarean delivery rates is extremely fast. Our statistics show that the cesarean delivery rate has doubled within only 5 years. Second, the rise has occurred undocumented and in the absence of national guidelines to rationalize cesarean deliveries. For example, the indications for cesarean delivery in Egypt are not known. Likewise, the complications, costs and consequences of these cesarean deliveries have seldom been a subject for research. All these factors increase the fear that a considerable proportion of these cesarean deliveries is unnecessary.

Obstetricians might opt to unnecessary cesarean deliveries because they can be convenient and lucrative. This is particularly true for the private sector. It is note worthwhile that the highest rate of cesarean delivery was reported in urban governorates, where the private sector predominates service provision. Unnecessary cesarean section is associated with increased postpartum infection, iatrogenic prematurity, higher incidence of neonatal illness, longer duration of hospitalization and higher costs of care than planned vaginal delivery [6 – 14].

With respect to the determinants of cesarean delivery, eight variables were found to be significantly associated with it. In order of magnitude of association these factors were utilization of antenatal care, parity, residence, previous U5 deaths, age at first birth, near birth problems, previous termination of pregnancy, preceding birth interval.

This study disclosed that maternal age was significantly associated with cesarean delivery. The probability of cesarean section among women older than 30 years was 0.8 that for younger women. The inverse relation between age and cesarean section rates is not congruent with results of several studies, which reported increased risk of cesarean deliveries among older women [40 – 44]. These studies argued that higher maternal age is more often associated with prolonged labor, fetal distress and failure to advance at the time of delivery, which may indicate a cesarean section.

However, many of these studies have not controlled for important confounding variables, and the magnitude of the risk conferred by age varied between reports. Differences of risk estimation might have resulted either from differences in populations or practice patterns in individual studies. Some variation, however, may also result from past studies not having uniformly controlled for potential confounding conditions that become more prevalent with age.

Nevertheless, the decisive factor to be considered in the relation between maternal age and cesarean delivery in Egypt is the proportion related to obstetricians’ attitude, behavior and practice patterns. It is not uncommon in Egypt nowadays that obstetricians tend to use cesarean delivery with nulliparas, especially in Urban and better-off areas.

The utilization of antenatal care was the strongest determinants of cesarean delivery in Egypt. The probability of undergoing a cesarean delivery among women who used antenatal care was 2.4 higher than women who did not. This association is expected since most of pregnancy complications that might indicate cesarean delivery can be easily diagnosed by routine antenatal care. For example, hypertensive states of pregnancy, abnormal fetal presentations and placenta previa can all be diagnosed or predicted by simple diagnostic workups during antenatal care. A planned cesarean delivery in such cases might save the life of the mother and the newborn.

It is note worthwhile that near birth complications such as prolonged labor, hemorrhage and eclampsia were significantly associated with cesarean delivery. However, a considerable proportion of women who did not report near birth complications have undergone cesarean delivery. The indication for cesarean deliveries in these cases is unknown. While maternal underreporting of near birth complications can explain a part of these cases, we feel that a considerable part of cesarean delivery among women who did not report near birth problems might have been unnecessary.

Parity was significantly associated with cesarean delivery. Women with less than three live births were two times more likely to undergo cesarean delivery than women with higher parity. This association is incongruent with studies in other parts of the world [47 – 48]. These studies found a direct relation between parity and cesarean section rates that was statistically significant and persisted even after adjusting for the effect of maternal age. The higher rates of caesarean delivery among low parity women strongly suggest the misuse of this surgical procedure by obstetricians, presumably for lucrative reasons.

Mothers residing in urban areas had a 1.7 fold higher probability of cesarean delivery than mothers residing in rural areas. This might reflect a better access of mothers to obstetric care better in urban areas. Further, hospitals in urban centers are known to be better equipped than hospitals in rural areas with medical infrastructure, which are required to perform cesarean delivery. However, the higher rates of cesarean delivery in urban areas might indicate the lucrative incentive for overusing cesarean delivery in these areas, where patients are more able and willing to pay. The relation between socioeconomic status and cesarean delivery was established in several well-designed studies [49 – 51].

In summary, rationalization of cesarean deliveries is an urgent medical and public health need in Egypt today. Rationalization encompasses reducing unnecessary cesarean deliveries and making this operative alternative available for women who need it as well. This need a concerted action from all parties involved and concerned. These parties include the ministry of health, the doctor syndicate, the medical schools and the media. The first step in this direction could be more research for better understanding of the complex dimensions of the problem. The cost dimensions of the problem should be considered as well.

Directions for action include improving the access to cesarean deliveries in the rural areas, especially in Upper Egypt. Simultaneously, rationalization schemes and practice guidelines should be developed and introduced to obstetrical practice in public and private hospitals.

There are several successful examples in reducing unnecessary cesarean deliveries for Egypt to learn from. For example, the US Healthy People 2000 initiative [52], which was started in the early 1990s to reduce cesarean deliveries to 15%. Several models and approaches were used to attain the initiative goals, which were shown to have strong impact on cesarean delivery rates [53]. These approaches included total quality management systems, continuous quality improvement schemes, benchmarking, active management of labor programs and incentive driven auditing [54 – 56]. These approaches were implemented in several developing countries and were shown to work in low-resourced settings as well [57 – 58].

References

1. El-Zanaty F and Way A. Egypt Demographic and Health Survey 2000. Calverton, Maryland [USA]: Ministry of Health and Population [Egypt], National Population Council and ORC Macro, 2001.
2. Egypt Demographic and Health Survey 1992.
3. Abou Zahar C and Wardlaw T. Maternal mortality at the end of a decade: Signs of progress. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2001, 79: 561–568.
4. Notzon FC. International differences in the use of obstetric interventions. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 263:3286.
5. Danforth DN. Cesarean section. Journal of the American Medical Association 1985; 253:811.
6. Zelop C, Heffner LJ. The Downside of Cesarean Delivery: Short- and Long-Term Complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;47(2):386-393.
7. Koroukian SM. Relative risk of postpartum complications in the Ohio Medicaid population: vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Jun;61(2):203-24.
8. Hager RM, Daltveit AK, Hofoss D, Nilsen ST, Kolaas T, Oian P, Henriksen T. Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;190(2):428-34.
9. Chauhan SP, Martin JN Jr, Henrichs CE, Morrison JC, Magann EF. Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):408-17.
10. Loverro G, Greco P, Vimercati A, Nicolardi V, Varcaccio-Garofalo G, Selvaggi L. Maternal complications associated with cesarean section. J Perinat Med. 2001;29(4):322-6.
11. Abbassi H, Aboulfalah A, Morsad F, Matar N, Himmi A, Mansouri AE. Maternal complications of cesarean section: retrospective analysis of 3,231 interventions at the Casablanca University Hospital, Morocco. Sante. 2000 Nov-Dec;10(6):419-23.
12. Franchi M, Salvatore S, Fasola M, Balestreri D, Scorbati E. Cesarean section: an economic appraisal of infectious complications. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1993;20(2):108-10.
13. Rogers RE. Complications at cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1988 Dec;15(4):673-84.
14. Boulanger JC, Vitse M, Verhoest P, Camier B, Caron C, Firmin JM. Maternal complications of cesarean section. Results of a multicenter study. I. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1986;15(3):327-32
15. Bost BW. Cesarean delivery on demand: what will it cost? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;188(6):1418-21
16. DiMaio H, Edwards RK, Euliano TY, Treloar RW, Cruz AC. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an historic cohort cost analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;186(5):890-2.
17. Gillette RD.Cost of vaginal delivery vs. repeated cesarean section. Am Fam Physician. 1996 May 15;53(7):2284, 2287.
18. Shearer EL.Cesarean section: medical benefits and costs. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Nov;37(10):1223-31.
19. Guasticchi G, Signorelli C. The costs of cesarean section compared to vaginal delivery: an economic analysis as related to an average-size hospital. Ann Ig. 1991 Sep-Oct;3(5):293-7.
20. Menard MK. Cesarean delivery rates in the United States. The 1990s. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999 Jun;26(2):275-86.
21. Schully D. Men who controls women’s health: The Mis-Education of obstetrician-gynecologists. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University, 1994.
22. Taffel SM, Placek PJ, Liss T. Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise. Am J Public Health. 1987 Aug;77(8):955-9.
23. Saunders LD, Flowerdew G. Cesarean sections in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988. CMAJ. 1991 May 15;144(10):1243-9, 1252.
24. Anderson GM, Lomas J. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982. N Engl J Med. 1984 Oct 4;311(14):887-92.
25. Eckerlund I, Gerdtham UG. Econometric analysis of variation in cesarean section rates. A cross-sectional study of 59 obstetrical departments in Sweden. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Fall;14(4):774-87.
26. Ballacci, F., Medda, E., Pinnelli, A., & Spinelli, A. Cesarean delivery in Italy: a European record. Epidemiol Prev 1996; 20: 105-106.
27. Kolas T, Hofoss D, Daltveit AK, Nilsen ST, Henriksen T, Hager R, Ingemarsson I, Oian P. Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;188(4):864-70.
28. Panico MG, Romano N, Trinchese N, Agozzino E. Epidemiology of Cesarean section and birth surveillance. Ann Ig. 2002 Mar-Apr;14(2):115-25.
29. Garcia-Benites CQ, Lira Plascencia J, Ibarguengoitia Ochoa F, Aguayo Gonzalez P, Ahued Ahued JR, Neri Mendez CJ. Cesarean section: science or anxiety? Eleven years of institutional experience. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1997 Jun;65:247-53.
30. Thiery M, Derom R, Buekens P. Frequency of cesarean deliveries in Belgium. Biol Neonate. 1989;55(2):90-6.
31. Borthen I, Lossius P, Skjaerven R, Bergsjo P. Changes in frequency and indications for cesarean section in Norway 1967-1984. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68(7):589-93.
32. Kambo I, Bedi N, Dhillon BS, Saxena NC.A critical appraisal of cesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Nov;79(2):151-8.
33. Leung GM, Lam TH, Thach TQ, Wan S, Ho LM. Rates of cesarean births in Hong Kong: 1987-1999. Birth. 2001 Sep;28(3):166-72.
34. Cai WW, Marks JS, Chen CH, Zhuang YX, Morris L, Harris JR. Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China. Am J Public Health. 1998 May;88(5):777-80.
35. Belizán JM, Althabe F, Barros FC, Alexander S. Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study. BMJ. 1999 November 27; 319 (7222): 1397–1402.
36. Barros, FC., Vaughan, JP., Victora, CG., & Huttly, SRA. Epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil. Lancet 1991; 338: 167-169.
37. Murray, SF. & Serani Pradenas, F. Cesarean birth trends in Chile, 1986 to 1994. Birth 1997; 24: 258-263.
38. Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Increasing cesarean section rates: exploring the role of culture in an Australian community. Birth. 2004 Jun;31(2):117-24.
39. Blumenthal NJ, Harris RS, O'Connor MC, Lancaster PA. Changing caesarean section rates. Experience at a Sydney obstetric teaching hospital. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Nov;24(4):246-51.
40. Lin HC, Xirasagar S. Maternal age and the likelihood of a maternal request for cesarean delivery: a 5-year population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):848-55.
41. Lin HC, Sheen TC, Tang CH, Kao S. Association between maternal age and the likelihood of a cesarean section: a population-based multivariate logistic regression analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Dec;83(12):1178-83.
42. Ecker JL, Chen KT, Cohen AP, Riley LE, Lieberman ES. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):883-7.
43. Dulitzki M, Soriano D, Schiff E, Chetrit A, Mashiach S, Seidman DS. Effect of very advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcome and rate of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Dec;92(6):935-9.
44. Parrish KM, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Connell FA, LoGerfo JP. Effect of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates. JAMA. 1994 Feb 9;271(6):443-7.
45. Gareen IF, Morgenstern H, Greenland S, Gifford DS. Explaining the association of maternal age with Cesarean delivery for nulliparous and parous women. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Nov;56(11):1100-10.
45. Martel M, Wacholder S, Lippman A, Brohan J, Hamilton E. Maternal age and primary cesarean section rates: a multivariate analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Feb;156(2):305-8.
46. Witter FR, Repke JT, Niebyl JR. The effect of maternal age on primary cesarean section rate. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1988 Aug;27(1):51-5.
47. Chan BC, Lao TT. Influence of parity on the obstetric performance of mothers aged 40 years and above. Hum Reprod. 1999 Mar;14(3):833-7.
48. Abu-Heija A, Rasheed R, el-Qaraan O. Effect of age and parity on primary caesarean section rates. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1998;25(1-2):38-9.
49. Fabri RH, Murta EF. Socioeconomic factors and cesarean section rates. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Jan;76(1):87-8.
50. King DE, Lahiri K. Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. JAMA. 1994 Aug 17;272(7):524-9.
51. Gould JB, Davey B, Stafford RS. Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jul 27;321(4):233-9.
52. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Health People 2000. DHHS Publication No. 91-50213. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office: 1991;:378-379
53. Flamm B, Berwick D, Kabcenell A. Reducing cesarean section rates safely: Lessons from a "Breakthrough Series" Collaborative. Birth. 1998;25(2).
54. Main EK. Reducing cesarean birth rates with data-driven quality improvement activities. Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):374-83.
55. Gregory KD, Hackmeyer P, Gold L, Johnson AI, Platt LD. Using the continuous quality improvement process to safely lower the cesarean section rate. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Dec;25(12):619-29.
56. Sonnad SS, Moyer CA, Bernstein SJ. Comparing physician and administrator responses to cesarean section guidelines and actual practice. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Sep;26(9):515-24.
57. Somprasit C, Tanprasertkul C, Kamudhamas A. Reducing cesarean delivery rates: an active management labor program in a setting with limited resources. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Jan;88(1):20-5.
58. Sloan NL, Pinto E, Calle A, Langer A, Winikoff B, Fassihian G. Reduction of the cesarean delivery rate in Ecuador. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000 Jun;69(3):229-36.

Author Information

Khaled Yassin, MD, DrPH
Center for International Health Studies

Ghanim Abu Saida, MPH
Center for International Health Studies

Download PDF

Your free access to ISPUB is funded by the following advertisements:

 

BACK TO TOP
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

© 2013 Internet Scientific Publications, LLC. All rights reserved.    UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy