ISPUB.com / IJU/6/2/3075
  • Author/Editor Login
  • Registration
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

ISPUB.com

Internet
Scientific
Publications

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Latest Articles
  • Disclaimers
  • Article Submissions
  • Contact
  • Help
  • The Internet Journal of Urology
  • Volume 6
  • Number 2

Original Article

Ipsilateral Pulmonary Reexpansion Edema During Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

A Öztürk, A Gülle, S Gürsoy

Keywords

reexpansion edema, vats

Citation

A Öztürk, A Gülle, S Gürsoy. Ipsilateral Pulmonary Reexpansion Edema During Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery. The Internet Journal of Urology. 2009 Volume 6 Number 2.

Abstract


Reinflation of collapsed lung sometimes may lead to pulmonary edema (REPE). REPE is potentially fatal iatrogenic complication with mortality rate of %20 is far from benign. The exact pathophysiology of reexpansion pulmonary edema is unknown; mechanical and inflammatory processes are incriminated. Treatment is supportive.Young age,longer duration,large pneumothorax are encounterded risk factors in developing REPE.We report a case of (REPE) after video thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in 54 year old man suffered progressive dyspnea.REPE is very rare complication in VATS experience, until now five cases present in English literature

 

İntroduction

Reinflation of a collapsed lung may lead to REPE. REPE is potentially fatal iatrogenic complication with mortality rate of % 20 that is far from benign. It is very rare complication of VATS. Preventive measures and knowing risk factors is important to cope this stressful condition.

Case report

A 54 year old man after traffic accident a month ago was admitted thorasic surgery department with progressive dsypnea. He had no chest pain, cough or fever. He had history of diabetus mellitus.

Vital signs were stabile. He looked confortable and wasn’t in respiratory distress.On physical examination breath sounds couldn’t be heard on right hemithorax.The left lung fields were clear.Other findings were normal on examination

Blood analysis,biochemical values were normal. A chest radiograph revaeled complete right sided opacity, left mediastinal and trakeal deviation. Broncoscopy was done, compressed right main bronchus with moderate amount of bronchial secretion was seen and aspired.

Right thoracentesis drained defibrinated hemorragic fluid. He was scheduled for VATS .

VATS was performed under one lung ventilation with left lateral position. 4000 cc defibrinated hemorragic fluid was drained.Under thorocoscopic view right lung expanded easly,it's pinky and occupied entire right thorax.After operation the patient woke easily, was extubated and taken into the intensive care unit.

Just after the operation the patient was confortable, breath sounds were normal on both hemithoraces. Blood gas analysis revealed mild hypoxia with PH: 7.34, PCO2: 42.6 mm Hg, PO2: 60.4 mm Hg and HCO3: 22.7 mmol/L The patient received supplemental oxygen via a nasal canule to compensate for hypoxemia.

On the second postoperatif hour the patient gradually developed respiratory distress and his condition deteriorated.He became tachycardic and tachypneic. On auscultation breath sounds were decreased on right hemithorax. A chest radiograph (fig:1) showed diffuse opacity over entire right lung. Blood gas analysis at that time revealed respiratuar acidosis with PH:7.16 ,PCo2: 72.8 mm Hg ,Po2: 144 mm Hg and HCO3 25.3mmol/L. Except moderate leucocytosis (15200) blood count and biochemical parametres were in normal range.

The patient was intubated secondary to respiratory insufficency and mechanically ventilated. Steroids and diuretics are prescribed.By the next ten hours blood gas values improved markedly to PH 7.44 , PCO2 32.7 mm Hg, PO2 90 mm Hg and HCO3 21.8mmol/ L

On the first postoperatif day breath sounds were heard on right hemithorax . Blood gas analysis

revealed mild hiperoxi with PH 7.43 , PCO2 34.5 mm Hg, PO2 151 mm Hg, HCO3 22.5mmol/L. Chest radiograph obtained that time demonstrates rapid resolution of the infiltrates (fig:2).

Leucocytosis gradually decreased. The patient was extubated on the following day and recovered uneventfully

Figure 1
Figure1: Development of pulmonary reexpansion edema two hours after operation

Figure 2
Figure 2: clearing of reexpansion pulmonary edema in the right lung

Discussion

VATS is safe and effective procedure. VATS with low morbidity and mortality rates,patient comfort and with decreased hospital stay is superior to thorocotomy. Prolonged air leak,hemorrage and infection are some of known complications of VATS but REPE is very rare complication in VATS experience, until now 5 cases present in English literature (1-2).

REPE can be fatal iatrogenic complication that occurs after rapid reexpansion of a collapsed lung. (3).The precise incidence isn’t known but ranged from 0.9 % to14 % after tube thorocostomy(4). VATS needs general anesthesia with one lung ventilation (OLV) .OLV can have adverse effects on pulmoner circulation because of hypoxic vasoconstriction of nonventilated lung and partitioning of blood flow between dependent and nondependent lungs (5) Several cases of pulmonary edema associated with OLV have been reported (2).

We know something about the aetiology, pathophysilogy and preventive measures of REPE after thoracocentesis or tube thorocostomy but there is limited information on short term lung collaps and reinflation as seen in OLV (2).

Although the exact pathophysiology of REPE is unknown. İncreased permeability of pulmonary capillaries ,prolonged hypoxia,restoration of pulmonary circulation and increased negative intrapleural pressure may be important in developing REPE (4). Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines are detected in edema fluid and blood suggests inflammatory and immunologic nature of REPE (4-6). Presence of proteins ,red blood cells,neutrophils in bronchial aspirates supports certain degree of diffuse alveolar damage explains inefficency of oxigenation despite high FiO2 (7).

REPE is usually seen in ipsilateral entire lung but contrlateral or bilateral cases also present (6).Single lobe or segment rarely may be involved .Correlation between radiological and clinical findings isn't rule. Radiographic findings without clinical correlation don’t require therapy. Radiologic apperance of REPE is usually indistinguishable from other forms of pulmonary edema (7)

The clinical course is often rapid and variable(4).Situation is usually self limited (6). Cough, dyspnea, tachypnea, and tachycardia are frequent symptoms, rarely large amounts of frothy pink sputum is seen (7). Persistant cough heralds the development of pulmonary edema. The progression of edema results in hypoxia.Oxygen therapy alone is usually insufficent to improve blood oxgenation because of fluid filled alveolar space. Symptoms usually increase in severity for 24- 48 hours then slowly resolves next 5-7 days(7).

Early recognition of REPE is important because the disease proves fatal in up to 20% of cases (5). The situation is unpredictable but younger age,large pneumothorax ( > % 30), prolonged collaps, excess negative intrapulmoner pressure application and drainage of more than 1500 cc fluid once are risk factors (6-8).

Therapy is supportive.Mechanical ventilation with positive end expiratory pressure and hemodynamic support may be appropriate (3-4-8

Here, prolonged collaps (> a month), excess drainage( 4000 cc ) and OLV can be risk factors in developing REPE.Large volume of dranaige isn't recommended for thoracocentesis. Similar recommondation may be relevant for VATS. OLV may have adverse effect on pulmonary circulation but,right hemithorax was full of fluid compressed entire lung with no ventilation.The ongoing hypoxic vasoconstriction wasn't result of OLV and could exclude the explanation of some of OLV's adverse effect in this situation. Timing is typical here, REPE developed two hours after operation.And ,also rapid clearing of the chest graphy wasn't consistent with pneunomia, lung contusion or acute respiratory distress syndrom supports the diagnosis of REPE.Unfortunately,we didn’t have bronchial aspirates after REPE developed to measure the concentration of protein content, cellular elements etc,to eluminate other factors contribute in pulmoner edema formation.

References

1. Yim AP, Liu HP Complications and failures of video-assisted thoracic surgery: experience from two centers in Asia. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;2:538-41.
2. Yanagidate F, Dohi S, Hamaya Y, Tsujito T.Reexpansion pulmonary edema after thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection.Anesth Analg. 2001;6:1416-7
3. Sherman SC.Reexpansion pulmonary edema: a case report and review of the current literature.J Emerg Med. 2003;1:23-7.
4. Neustein SM. Reexpansion pulmonary edema.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;6:887-91
5. Benumof JL.One-lung ventilation and hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction: implications for anesthetic management.Anesth Analg. 1985;8:821-
6. Conen A, Joos L, Bingisser R.Ipsilateral reexpansion pulmonary edema after drainage of a spontaneous pneumothorax: a case report.J Med Case Reports. 2007;1:107
7. Chiolero R, Vock P, Wicky S. Clinical and radiologic features of pulmonary edema. Radiographics. 1999;6:1507-31
8. Matsuura Y, Nomimura T, Murakami H, Matsushima T, Kakehashi M, Kajihara H. Clinical analysis of reexpansion pulmonary edema.Chest. 1996;6:1562-6.

Author Information

Ata Öztürk
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Dr Suat Seren Chest and Thorasic Surgery Training Hospital

Alper Gülle
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Dr Suat Seren Chest and Thorasic Surgery Training Hospital

Soner Gürsoy
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Dr Suat Seren Chest and Thorasic Surgery Training Hospital

Download PDF

Your free access to ISPUB is funded by the following advertisements:

 

BACK TO TOP
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

© 2013 Internet Scientific Publications, LLC. All rights reserved.    UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy