ISPUB.com / IJU/12/1/14723
  • Author/Editor Login
  • Registration
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

ISPUB.com

Internet
Scientific
Publications

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Latest Articles
  • Disclaimers
  • Article Submissions
  • Contact
  • Help
  • The Internet Journal of Urology
  • Volume 12
  • Number 1

Case Study

Metastatic Prostate Adenocarcinoma Presenting As Inguinal Lymphadenopathy

N Ghosh, S Mukherjee, T Jindal, R K Sharma, M R Kamal, R K Sinha, P Sharma, D Karmakar

Keywords

inguinal lymphadenopathy, metastasis, prostate adenocarcinoma

Citation

N Ghosh, S Mukherjee, T Jindal, R K Sharma, M R Kamal, R K Sinha, P Sharma, D Karmakar. Metastatic Prostate Adenocarcinoma Presenting As Inguinal Lymphadenopathy. The Internet Journal of Urology. 2014 Volume 12 Number 1.

Abstract

Most common presentation of metastatic adenocarcinoma is either symptomatic bony metastasis or intra-abdominal or pelvic lymph node metastasis. The inguinal lymph node metastasis is very rare. We report an unusual case of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma presenting as inguinal lymphadenopathy.

 

Introduction

Prostate adenocarcinoma is one of the leading cancers in elderly male. Approximately 70% of patients with prostate cancer have metastatic lesions at presentation (1). Most common sites of metastasis are bones and regional lymph nodes. The iliac (external and internal), obturator, pre-sacral and hypogastric nodes, followed by para-aortic lymph nodes are most often involved in the primary lymphatic spread (2, 3). Metastasis to inguinal lymph nodes in the absence of pelvic lymphadenopathy is uncommon (4). We report a rare case of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma presented as inguinal lymphadenopathy.

Case report

A 82 years male patient presented to his general physician for gradual swelling of his left lower extremity. On examination, a hard, about 4 cm, irregular, non tender swelling was detected just below the inguinal ligament. A FNAC was done from the lymph node which was suggestive of metastatic adenocarcinoma (Figure 3). He was referred to Department of Urology. On subsequent evaluation, it was found that he was suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms for 2 years. On digital rectal examination, prostate was enlarged, hard and irregular. His serum PSA was 486 ng/ml.  Whole body bones scan (Tc99 MDP) revealed increased tracer uptake in multiple thorasic vertebrae, ribs, pelvic bones, trochanteric regions of both femori (Figure 1). TRUS guided prostatic biopsy showed infiltrating adenocarcinoma of prostate (Gleason score = 4 + 3). Contrast enhanced CT scan showed enlarged prostate with heterogeneous attenuation; No significant pelvic or para aortic lymphadenopathy; Extensive sclerotic deposits in pelvic bones (Figure  2).

We discussed with the patient and his relatives regarding the management options and prognosis.  We offered him bilateral orchidectomy and androgen receptor blocker (Bicalutamide - 150 mg/day initially, followed by 5o mg/day after bilateral orchidectomy). For bone metastasis, we offered him zolindronic acid in standard regimen along with oral calcium and Vitamin D. He was doing well in subsequent follow up.

Discussion

The prostate adenocarcinoma is predominantly a disease of older men. It most often metastasize to regional lymph nodes (iliac and obturator) and bones by lymphatic and haematogenous spread. Metastases to inguinal lymph nodes are very rare and only few related case reports have been published in medical literature.

 The possible explanation of the dissemination mechanism of prostate adenocarcinoma to inguinal lymph nodes is three-fold –

Retrograde lymphatic spread in the presence of para-aortic lymph nodes.
Prostate cancer cells could reach the inguinal canal via the spermatic cord.
Ectopic prostate tissue outside the genital-urinary system may develop carcinoma. (5)

Inguinal lymph nodes do not typically lie in the lymphatic drainage pathway of the prostate; therefore, inguinal lymphadenopathy is an unlikely early manifestation of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma and is indicator of very advanced stage and dismal prognosis (6,7).

Our patient, who initially presented with inguinal lymphadenopathy, found to harbour metastatic adenocarcinoma, was treated with standard hormonal therapy with bilateral orchidectomy and androgen receptor blocker.

In differential diagnosis of metastatic inguinal nodes apart from scrotal, vaginal, anal canal and cervical cancers, prostate adenocarcinoma also must be kept in mind by physicians. We emphasize that per abdomen examination, digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum PSA shall be performed to rule out primary of unknown origin in case of persistent inguinal lymphadenopathy.

Images

Figure 1
Whole body bone scan showing multiple bony metastases

Figure 2
CECT abdomen and pelvis showed absence of pelvic adenopathy and para-aortic lymphadenopathy and large prostate involving seminal vesicles

Figure 3
A fine needle biopsy of inguinal lymph node revealed metastatic poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma

References

1. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M: Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51: 15-36

2. Jackson AS, Sohaib SA, Staffurth JN, et al: Distribution of lymph nodes in men with prostatic adenocarcinoma and lymphadenopathy at presentation: a retrospective radiological review and implications for prostate and pelvis radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2006; 18: 109-116.

3. Huang E, Teh BS, Mody DR, et al: Prostate adenocarcinoma presenting with inguinal lymphadenopathy. Urology 2003; 61: 463.

4. Rosa M, Chopra HK, Sahoo S: Fine needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma to inguinal lymph node. Diagn Cytopathol 2007; 35: 565-567.

5. Ito H, Fuse H, Hirano S, Masuda S. Ectopic prostatic tissue outside the urinary tract: a Case report. Int J Urol 1998; 5:391-2.

6. Slavis SA, Golji H, Miller JB: Adenocarcinoma of the prostate presenting as inguinal adenopathy. Cleve Clin J Med 1990; 57: 97.

7. Oyan B, Engin H, Yalcin S. Generalized lymphadenopathy: a rare presentation of disseminated prostate cancer. Med Oncol 2002; 19:177-9.

Author Information

Nabankur Ghosh, Senior Resident
Department of Urology, Calcutta National Medical College
Kolkata India
gnabankur@ gmail.com

Subhabrata Mukherjee, Senior Resident
Department of Urology, Calcutta National Medical College
Kolkata India

Tarun Jindal, Senior Resident
Department of Urology, Calcutta National Medical College
Kolkata India

Raj Kumar Sharma, Senior Resident
Department of Urology, Calcutta National Medical College
Kolkata India

Mir Reza Kamal, Senior Resident
Department of Urology, Calcutta National Medical College
Kolkata India

Rajan Kumar Sinha, Senior Resident
Department of Urology, Calcutta National Medical College
Kolkata India

P. K. Sharma, Assistant Professor
Department of Urology, Calcutta National Medical College
Kolkata India

Dilip Karmakar, Professor and Head
Department of Urology, Calcutta National Medical College
Kolkata India

Download PDF

Your free access to ISPUB is funded by the following advertisements:

 

BACK TO TOP
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

© 2013 Internet Scientific Publications, LLC. All rights reserved.    UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy