ISPUB.com / IJU/11/1/1497
  • Author/Editor Login
  • Registration
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

ISPUB.com

Internet
Scientific
Publications

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Latest Articles
  • Disclaimers
  • Article Submissions
  • Contact
  • Help
  • The Internet Journal of Urology
  • Volume 11
  • Number 1

Case Study

Double Bear Paw : A Case of Complicated Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis

L Osei-Tutu, J Lee, D StJ Astill, K Horsell

Keywords

chronic pyelonephritis, schlagenhaufer, xantholomatous granulomatous pyelonephritis xgp

Citation

L Osei-Tutu, J Lee, D StJ Astill, K Horsell. Double Bear Paw : A Case of Complicated Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis. The Internet Journal of Urology. 2013 Volume 11 Number 1.

Abstract

Xantholomatous Granulomatous Pyelonephritis (XGP) is a rare variant of chronic pyelonephritis, initially described in 1916 by Schlagenhaufer as staphylomycosis due to the histological findings of staphylococci, foam cells, leucocytes and fibroblasts. It is an acute on chronic inflammatory process characterised by replacement of the renal parenchyma with yellowish looking lipid laden macrophages[1]. It has been known to mimic other conditions such as renal neoplasms and renal tuberculosis[2,3]. The classic radiological finding of XGP is of a ‘Bear Paw’ due to the dilated renal calyces and atrophied and infected renal parenchyma.
We present the case of a patient with a unilateral XGP with an additional complication which resulted in the appearance of a Double Bear Paw.

 

BACKGROUND

Xantholomatous Granulomatous Pyelonephritis (XGP) is a rare variant of chronic pyelonephritis, initially described in 1916 by Schlagenhaufer as staphylomycosis due to the histological findings of staphylococci, foam cells, leucocytes and fibroblasts. It is an acute on chronic inflammatory process characterised by replacement of the renal parenchyma with yellowish looking lipid laden macrophages[1]. It has been known to mimic other conditions such as renal neoplasms and renal tuberculosis[2,3]. The classic radiological finding of XGP is of a ‘Bear Paw’ due to the dilated renal calyces and atrophied and infected renal parenchyma.
We present the case of a patient with a unilateral XGP with an additional complication which resulted in the appearance of a Double Bear Paw.

CASE REPORT

The patient was a 46 year old male, who is a long term nursing home resident due to a ruptured cerebral aneurysm 10 years prior. He is cognitively intact but is quadriplegic and has a long term urinary catheter. He initially presented with pyrexia of unknown origin and weight loss of 20kg over 6 months. His white cell count was 20.6 x 109 /L with 83% neutrophils. A CT scan performed by the treating medical unit (see images) demonstrated a markedly hydronephrotic kidney with a large loculated retroperitoneal collection traversing the posterior abdominal wall musculature. He was subsequently referred to the Urology Unit at the Repatriation General Hospital.
Initial management was incision and drainage of the subcutaneous abscess, which yielded over 1 litre of purulent material and multiple calculi, which on culture grew Proteus mirabilis. The cavity was packed with ribbon gauze for a period of 4 weeks prior to open nephrectomy through a flank incision. Histology was consistent with XGP and multiple calculi ranging from 10 to 35mm in size.
Post operative course was uncomplicated and the patient returned to hospital 4 months later for a planned cystolitholapaxy at which time he reported that he had regained 15kg of weight.

Figure 1

CT Scan Images – Transverse and Coronal Slices demonstrating a Double Bear Paw sign, renal calculi and an incidental bladder stone.

Figure 2

Histopathological images- Macroscopic bivalve section and Light Microscopy

DISCUSSION

XGP predominantly affects adults, but has been reported in children mainly below 8 years old. It has a female preponderance 3:1 in adults, with a male preponderance in children[5]. It can be focal or diffuse with focal XGP more common in paediatric cases. It is usually unilateral but rare cases of bilateral XGP have been described[3,5]. About 80% of patients are generally unwell for about a month or more, with non specific symptoms such as weight loss, fever and anorexia. Preceeding lower urinary tract symptoms such as dysuria, frequency, urgency and haematuria are often absent, hence the possible misdiagnosis with other conditions such as renal neoplasms[6-8]. 
Obstruction and infection of the collecting system are the 2 main features predisposing to XGP. Calculi causing obstruction has been described in > 50% of cases, with other forms of obstruction,eg.pelviureteric junction(PUJ)obstruction less commonly observed[3,6,7]. Positive urine cultures with E. coli and Proteus sp. are the commonly observed organisms in  XGP in about 70% of cases. Raised inflammatory markers (leucocytes, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) are the main abnormality in laboratory findings[8,9]. Radiological findings with plain film and USS are usually inconclusive with USS demonstrating an enlarged and distorted renal outline, with loss of the normal renal architecture. CT scan demonstrates the most accurate and helpful finding of “bear paw sign” on cross sectional images.The renal pelvis is contracted whereas the calyces are dilated, resembling the toe-pads of the bear paw[10,11].

Tissue biopsy for histology provides confirmation of the diagnosis. Macroscopically there is gross distortion of architecture of renal parenchyma with or without the collecting system. There is replacement of the renal parenchyma by areas of yellowish nodules with or without central areas of necrosis, likely extending into perirenal fat. Microscopically as described above, there is a heavy infiltrate of foam cells - yellowish looking macrophages with lipid filled vacuoles[6,8,12].
A staging system by Malek and Elder has been in existence since 1978 ; stage 1(Nephric XGP) is classified as disease confined to kidney(20-46%), stage 2 involves kidney and perirenal fat(14-70%) and stage 3 is widespread retroperitoneal involvement(10-36%)[6,7]. In this case of XGP, extension into subcutaneuous paravertebral tissue and musculature is beyond what Malek and Elder described as stage 3 XGP, and a modification of the staging system to include Stage 4 could be considered.

XGP can be complicated by risk of hypertension, persistent bacteriuria, amyloidosis and postoperatively by duodeno/colocutaneous fistulae[6].
Renal unit salvage is generally not possible, however there have been rare cases of nonsurgical management with antibiotics and anti-inflammatory agents, mainly in children with focal XGP. Nephrectomy is treatment of choice, usually total, but nephron sparing(partial nephrectomy) surgery has been described in certain cases of focal XGP[8].
In this case removal of the easier collection (subcutaneous) was undertaken prior to nephrectomy. Once the infective process was removed, the patient demonstrated a good recovery with return to his baseline level of function, indicating that surgical management with nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy if appropriate, are the main stay of treatment of XGP.

References

1. Schlagenhaufer F. Uber eigentumliche Staphylomykosen der Nieren und des pararenalen Bindegewebes. Frank Zeitsch Patho11916; 19:139-48.
2. Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis: Report of Nonsurgical Management of a Case and Review of the Literature. Perry S. Brown, Jr., Mia Dodson, and Peggy S. Weintrub cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/22/2/308.1.full.pdf
3. Levy M, Baumal R, Eddy AA. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis in children. Etiology, pathogenesis, clinical and radiologic features, and management. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1994;33:360-6.
4. D'Costa GF, Nagle SB, Wagholikar UL, Nathani RR. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis in children and adults-an 8 year study. Indian J Pathol MicrobioI1990;33:224-9.
5. Hammadeh MY, Nicholls G, Calder CJ, Buick RG, Gornall P, Corkery JI. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis in childhood: pre-operative diagnosis is possible. Br J UroI1994;73:83-6.
6. Malek RS, Elder JS. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: a critical analysis of 26 cases and of the literature. J Urol 1978; 119:589-93.
7. Chuang CK, Lai MK, Chang PL, et al. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis:experience in 36 cases. J UroI1992; 147:333-6.
8. Grainger RG, Longstaff AJ, Parsons MA. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: a reappraisal. Lancet 1982; 1:1398-401.
9. Rasoulpour M, Banco L, Mackay M, Hight DW, Berman MM. Treatment of focal xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis with antibiotics. J Pediatr 1984; 105:423-5.
10. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis Dr Yuranga Weerakkody and Dr Frank Gaillard et al. view revision history.radiopaedia.org/articles/xanthogranulomatous-pyelonephritis
11. Dyer RB, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ. Classic signs in uroradiology. Radiographics. 2004;24 Suppl 1 (suppl 1): S247-80. doi:10.1148/rg.24si045509 - Pubmed citation
12. Scully RE, Mark EJ, McNeely WF, McNeely BU. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital: weekly clinicopathological exercises. Case 2-1995: a 71-year-old man with masses in the pancreas, presacral region, and left kidney. N Engl J Med 1995;332:174-9.
13. Tolia BM, Iloreta A, Freed SZ, Fruchtman B, Bennett B, Newman HR. Xanthogranulo­matous pyelonephritis: detailed analysis of 29 cases and a brief discussion of atypical presentations. J Urol 1981;126:437-42.
14. Akhtar M, Abdul Hafez K, Linjawi T. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: King Faisal Specialist Hospital experience. Ann Saudi Med 1993;13(1):19-25
15. Goodman M, Curry T, Russell T. Xantho­granulomatous pyelonephritis (XGP): a local disease with systemic manifestations. Report of 23 patients and review of the literature. Medicine Baltimore 1979;58(2): 171-81.
16. Butnick R. Xanthogranulomatous pyelo­nephritis: an unusual case. J Urol 1971; 106:815-7.
17. Akhtar M, Qunibi W. Bilateral Xantho­granulomatous pyelonephritis involving native kidneys in a renal transplant recipient: association with renal cell carcinoma and amyloidosis. Am J Kidney Dis 1992;20(3):289-93.

Author Information

Lovelace Osei-Tutu, MRCSEd
Repatriation General Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia

Jason Lee, MClinEpid FRACS
Repatriation General Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia

David StJ Astill, PhD, FRCPA - Senior Consultant
Division of Surgical Pathology, Repatriation General Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia

Kym Horsell, FRACS
Repatriation General Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia

Download PDF

Your free access to ISPUB is funded by the following advertisements:

 

BACK TO TOP
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus

© 2013 Internet Scientific Publications, LLC. All rights reserved.    UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy