Total Intravenous Anesthesia Management Of A Patient With Myasthenia gravis
S Sahin, A Çolak, M ?nal, C Arar
Citation
S Sahin, A Çolak, M ?nal, C Arar. Total Intravenous Anesthesia Management Of A Patient With Myasthenia gravis. The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology. 2007 Volume 16 Number 1.
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease characterized by weakness and fatigability of skeletal muscles, with improvement following rest. It may be localized to specific muscle groups or it may be generalized. The peri-operative management of a patient with myasthenia gravis poses a significant challenge to the anesthesiologist. In this case report, we presented total intravenous anesthesia management of a patient with myasthenia gravis who progresed uneventful intra and postoperative period.
Introduction
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 20,000. The disorder affects females more than males (1,2). MG is caused by a decrease in the numbers of postsynaptic acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction (3), which decreases the capacity of the neuromuscular end-plate to transmit the nerve signal. Initially, in response to a stimulus resulting in depolarization, acetylcholine is released presynaptically. In MG, the number of activated postsynaptic receptors may be insufficient to trigger a muscle action potential (4,5). In this study, it is aimed to present Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) management of a patient with MG.
Case Report
A 41 year-old woman with MG was semielective scheduled for laporotomy general anesthesia. Three years ago, she was diagnosed with MG. In preoperative evaluation, the patient was in good condition. No respiratory, gastrointestinal system and renal system abnormalities were detected. Blood tests were normal: Leukocyte count 8.21 mm3, red cells 4.700 mm3; Hemoglobin 12.7 g/dl, haematocrit 37.5 %, time of activated thromboplastin 99 % and INR 1,01, platelet 272.000 mm3, electrolytes were normal.
On the operation day, following the feast 6 hours later, the patient was accepted to preoperative care unit and a 22 Gauge cannula was inserted into a vein on the dorsum of left hand and crystalloid infusion was started. No premedication was administered. Fifteen minutes later the patient was taken to the operating room. She was monitored with peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), electrocardiogram (leads II, V1), cutaneous temperature (T), noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP). Heat rate: 87 min-1, blood pressure: 130/50 mmHg, body temperature 37.3 ºC. Anesthesia was induced by using 1 µg.kg-1 remifentanil and 2 mg/kg propofol intravenously. Immediately after TIVA maintenance was achieved by using 8-10 mg/kg propofol and 1 µg.kg-1.min-1 remifentanil infusion intravenous. During adequate anesthesia, tracheal entubation was performed without any neuromusculer blockers. After tracheal entubation, 50 % oxygen in air inhalation was started. Hemodynamic and other vital parameters were stable during intraoperative period. The duration of the surgery was 125 minutes. After recovery of muscle tone, spontaneous breathing was adequate, trachea was extubated. No respiratory or hemodynamic problems were occurred. The patient was admitted to recovery room with stable vital signs (avarage blood pressure: 110/55 mmHg, heart rate 81 beats.min-1, peripheral oxygen saturation 99%, body temperature 37.2 ºC). Thirty minutes later she was sent to service with stable vital signs .
Discussion
Several anesthetic techniques have been described for myasthenic patients . The use of muscle relaxants in patients with MG has been associated with a higher rate of unsuccessful extubation at the end of surgery and with longer postoperative ventilation and hospital stay (6, 7). We avoided muscle relaxants in myasthenic patients because the neuromuscular effects of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants are known to be prolonged in patients with MG (8,9). The speed of onset of neuromuscular block is accelerated, the degree of block is potentiated and the rate of recovery is decreased(10). Chevalley and colleagues described the evolution of the perioperative management of myasthenic patients undergoing thymectomy and the possibility to predict the need for postoperative ventilation (6). They observed that postoperative ventilatory support was more frequently required when a balanced technique was used, particularly in patients who received muscle relaxants.
Clinicians are well aware of the risk of postoperative respiratory failure that may result from stress-induced exacerbation of myasthenia gravis (myasthenic crisis), an overdose of anticholinesterases (cholinergic crisis), the residual effects of myorelaxants or other adverse drug interactions (with antibiotics or antiarrhythmics). Therefore, routine postoperative ventilatory support and planned extubation in the intensive care unit have been recommended in high-risk patients.
Anesthetic management using barbiturates and propofol for myasthenic patients without untoward effects have been described (11, 12). Propofol has the theoretic advantages of short duration of action without effect on neuromuscular transmission. Opioid analgesics in therapeutic concentrations do not appear to depress neuromuscular transmission in myasthenic muscle (13, 14). However, central respiratory depression may be a problem with opioids. The introduction of short-acting opioids makes these drugs more titratable in the myasthenic. Remifentanil's short elimination half-life (9.5 minutes) (15) makes the drug appealing. To date, there are no reports of its use in MG.
Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for the management of myasthenics has been reported (11). In the authors' experience, hemodynamic instability in older patients makes this approach d i fficult, whereas younger patients usually tolerate it without difficulty. The use of remifentanil as part of T I VA may alleviate some of the hemodynamic instability.We were performed TIVA anaesthesia and tracheal entubation was performed without any neuromusculer blockers. No respiratory or hemodynamic problems were occurred.
In conclusion, MG may cause mortality. Anaesthetic management of this syndrome must be accomplished with the minimal applicable dose of the anaesthetic agent, any travmatic process should be avoided, other drugs must be carefully applied, and the patient must be observed carefully.